STEVIEBOY1
Established Member
- Joined
- 31 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 4,001
I prefer the 225s, but really like the old 125s too.
Sorry, but the Mk2/Mk3 stock WAS run down by VT. I was also a regular on the WCML in BR days and the VT days up to and including the introduction of the Pendo.
The stock was due a refurb at the end of BR and got a refresh quickly under VT (I'll give you that), but it then deteriorated (along with the track - Railtrack were especially bad) rapidly. Being particularly bad (they did the bare minimum in the run up to the intro of the Pendos where the 87s started to be unreliable (the Skodas having been all but withdrawn by then)
I agree that Virgin only appeared to do the bare minimum but from their point of view why spend a fortune on something when new trains are already on their way?
One could argue the same about the 125's on the ECML, yet VTEC seem to be spending a bit on engine and interior facelift.
Yes you could but I'm assuming that's because maybe the timescale for the introduction of the 800's is longer than it was for the Pendolino's?
Actually I think it's the other way round, as I remember the WC mk2/3 refresh took place during 1997/8 with the first of the 390's arriving in 2002, are not the EC 800's due sometime in 2018?
Actually I think it's the other way round, as I remember the WC mk2/3 refresh took place during 1997/8 with the first of the 390's arriving in 2002, are not the EC 800's due sometime in 2018?
. I recall one particularly memorable and cold journey from Reading to Stafford where we had to have three locomotive changes and I arrived home well past midnight.
For some enthusiasts that sounds like heaven!
There were definitely unrefurbed Mk3s out in 1998 - I have photos of me on one that are certainly from that year. I think it was a pre privatisation spec interior but most of the work was actually done post privatisation.
You are correct. I suppose technically it was under the West Coast TOU, as InterCity ceased to exist in 1994, but it was definitely under BR that the first West Coast Mark 3 set was refurbished - the refurb spec was BR's.Indeed there would still be a few unrefurbished rakes in 1998, I'm certain the first refurbished WC mk3 set (with table lamps in 1st class, blue seat trim in standard etc.) was released in the dying days of Intercity and in executive livery during 1996 but was funded by the owning Rosco and not BR, the Virgin franchise commenced from January 1997 and I don't think the full program was completed until the end of 1998.
You are correct. I suppose technically it was under the West Coast TOU, as InterCity ceased to exist in 1994, but it was definitely under BR that the first West Coast Mark 3 set was refurbished - the refurb spec was BR's.
The same applied on Cross-Country: the first few refurbished sets came out in InterCity livery.
I think it does its job extremely well, bringing 21st century comfort and 21st century speed to a 19th century network.
I would say that I am now fully accustomed to the 390 tilt. I still notice it but only when I'm looking for it. Whilst on a service from Edinburgh to York last month I realised that my body is fully tuned to tilt as when going around sharp corners on a 225 I was holding onto the table for dear life! Lol.
I used to suffer from 'tilt syndrome' where I would feel motion sickness. Now I prefer travelling on the 390 instead of long car journeys, if you can pick the right seat then they can be the best train you can come across. I think it does its job extremely well, bringing 21st century comfort and 21st century speed to a 19th century network.
As I type this i am arriving into Euston and feel alert and ready to tackle my FREE TUBE DAY!
One could argue the same about the 125's on the ECML, yet VTEC seem to be spending a bit on engine and interior facelift.
Another best train/worst train thread. Never any consensus.
Never any point.
Another best train/worst train thread. Never any consensus.
Never any point.
Because the majority shareholder in VTEC is Stagecoach which understands the commercial imperative of operating reliable trains. Christian Roth, Stagecoach's engineering director, is behind the drive that has enabled SWT to operate 5 out of the 7 most reliable train fleets in the country.
I would prefer 20th century comfort as 21st century "comfort" seems to be all about cram em in on wafer thin seats.
We were doing 125 in the 20th century too. And the 19th century network they run on has just had a £6bn upgrade to make it fit for 21st century
Good luck with the FREE TUBE DAY though. Seeing as the problem has now been fixed!
I would argue 20th century speed. We've been at 125 in this country in regular passenger service since 1976. It took until the 21st century for the WCML to catch up.
To be fair most threads on here end up the same way. Pointless bickering over semantics!
Not on the WCML though, with the exception of the APT for a short while.
The policy of "cram em in" allows more people to have a seat in which case that must surely be a good thing? Not to mention all the advantages that a Pendolino has over a Mk3.
It's also notable that SWTs trains tend to be pretty well turned out internally too. Even their slam-door trains were generally in a much better internal condition compared to comparable Connex trains at the time.
It's also notable that SWTs trains tend to be pretty well turned out internally too. Even their slam-door trains were generally in a much better internal condition compared to comparable Connex trains at the time.
Personally I find the seating on both Pendo and 225 uncomfortable for more than an hour journey, largely because they are all well worn with little padding.
Both interiors are similar age now, and neither has had a refurb with new seat bases since they were first used between 2003 and 2006. Contrasting them both to the sprung seats in Chiltern Mk3s and EMT HSTs shows just how poor both Pendo and 225 are.
The most comfortable seats I've travelled on recently are in South Eastern 395 Javelins, although as these trains have only been in use 6 years they are somewhat less used and if allowed another 6 years use before refurb may well be as bad by then.
The tilting mark 4s would have titled to a maximum of 6 degrees, rather than the 8 of the Pendolinos.Also, how far could a Mk 4 tilt if the appropriate equipment were fitted?
Presentation is and long has been a big thing to Stagecoach. When do you ever see one of their buses with mucky windows, or indeed even a dented Megabus? It really makes them look hugely better than the other big groups.