New South Western franchise: Awarded to First/MTR

[kieron]

Government wants to devolve operational and timetable decisions to the franchise, after meeting basic standards the franchisee would be free to make timetable changes without seeking permission.

I imagine it does, especially if it plans for the next franchise to make some very unpopular changes to timetables. As a bonus, it would reduce the amount of influence a future government would have on the operator.

 

[HarleyDavidson]

Let's be quite blunt the current SWT timetable is farcical, in that you have journey times that are seriously slow compared to the 70s & 80s and it falls to bits at the slightest knock and in the morning and evening peaks guards are forever getting messages about delays due to congestion between Surbiton and Waterloo.

It needs thinning out & a complete rewrite, especially on the suburban lines, where speeds are now as low as 35 mph.

 

[swt_passenger]

Taking on Reading-Gatwick seems very unlikely since GW are committed to testing the feasibility of IPEMU operation on this route.

But if DfT happened to transfer the route over it would just become one of the new SW TOC's requirements to do the same thing. GW are not the only people who can trial an IPEMU if asked.

 

[HarleyDavidson]

But if DfT happened to transfer the route over it would just become one of the new SW TOC's requirements to do the same thing. GW are not the only people who can trial an IPEMU if asked.

As stated it makes more sense to put Reading to Gatwick in the SWT franchise as it runs mostly within the SWT area and reduces the amount of TOC on TOC delay problems and number of operators through both Wokingham and Guildford.

It's called keeping it simple.

 

[Goldfish62]

Let's be quite blunt the current SWT timetable is farcical, in that you have journey times that are seriously slow compared to the 70s & 80s and it falls to bits at the slightest knock and in the morning and evening peaks guards are forever getting messages about delays due to congestion between Surbiton and Waterloo.

It needs thinning out & a complete rewrite, especially on the suburban lines, where speeds are now as low as 35 mph.

I agree. The current timetable is basically unchanged since 2004, except for extra minutes added in here and there to attempt incremental improvement to KPIs. Trains which sit around en route due to slack scheduling and then still arrive late at their destination are the norm. There's something seriously amiss.

There was an article in a recent issue of Modern Railway on railway scheduling which said that slack scheduling encourages slack practice.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---

As this relates to the next franchise, it may not even be Stagecoach who get it.

Indeed. Stagecoach would have no say in the matter.

 

[Deepgreen]

I think that an etymological research would show the noun "tram" and the suffix "(i)cation" being the nearest to the make-up of this word.

Another similar but less convoluted example, having then an internal contraction, more used on this website, is that of "bustitution"...:roll:
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


I remember that thread as it was only yesterday and where I was seen by some to be acting as a consultant for Southern Vectis. Indeed, after that enjoyable thread, my inner self felt greatly invigorated...

Missing an "if" between the "as" and "it" in your first line.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---

Taking on Reading - Gatwick means that you stop wasting diesels on stupid little capacity eating (blocking) trips and using them on something more purposeful instead.

Alternatively you could always keep some of those 442s, couple a 73/9 to the rear or front of it, you can then use the electric motors on the electrified bits and use the 73/9 on the non-electrified bits. Simples! And of course it releases the 165/166s for use in the Bristol/Cardiff/Exeter corridors and the 442s would provide the extra coaches for the required capacity on that line during the holiday & peak periods.

I would love to see 5-car 442 trains on what is my local line, but I have seen no plans for any time in the next few decades for lengthening any platforms on the route, so it almost certainly won't happen.

 

[HarleyDavidson]

Missing an "if" between the "as" and "it" in your first line.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


I would love to see 5-car 442 trains on what is my local line, but I have seen no plans for any time in the next few decades for lengthening any platforms on the route, so it almost certainly won't happen.

You won't, you won't see electrification anytime soon either, because the line doesn't involve London or have any services to/from London either. Like many parts of the UK, if it doesn't have anything to do with London it's irrelevant and will suffer.

 

[The Ham]

You won't, you won't see electrification anytime soon either, because the line doesn't involve London or have any services to/from London either. Like many parts of the UK, if it doesn't have anything to do with London it's irrelevant and will suffer.

It may not serve London, but if it becomes the only diesel line locally then the case to electrify gets better.

 

[HarleyDavidson]

It may not serve London, but if it becomes the only diesel line locally then the case to electrify gets better.

Those of us who live along the line have been waiting over 40 years for it to be done, it was going to be done until one idiot from a parish council objected to it and spread the notion that the electric trains that would run on it would be noisier and more polluting that the existing diesel trains at the time (which were the good old thumpers) & which were subsequently replaced by 3-WR DMMU or stink/smoke bombs, because the line was transferred to the Western Region for political dogma reasons.

So that one idiot of a parish councillor, scotched the whole electrification project of the North Downs Line, shortly after that the lines signalling was severely rationalised, with Gomshall, Chilworth & Ash signalised signal boxes closed and some very long signal sections created, all of which still exist today between Guildford and Redhill, some between Ash & Blackwater were shortened slightly.

You still have to wait at Blackwater for a preceding train to reach Wokingham or on Wokingham bank for a train to clear Blackwater.

Going the other way you have to wait just outside Chilworth for a preceding service to clear Gomshall or wait at Gomshall for a train to clear Chilworth and be at Shalford.

 

[JamesRowden]

Well if you're good at working out the old fashioned miles & chains, it's from:

Wokingham junction to Aldershot South junction and Shalford junction to Reigate level crossing.

As I have said previously the notion of using a battery powered train over the line, is nuts due to the gradients and the nature of the line, it would only take a delay (of which there have been plenty just recently) on the non electrified section for it to get stuck with insufficient power to move.

It should either be diesel or electric, however the hybrid solution of attaching a diesel locomotive such as a 67 or 73/9 to a 442 so you can use the 750dc where it's available, then the diesel to haul or push on the non electrified sections.

The solution to your power/energy output concern would be to have a quad-mode train which contains the following sources and energy storage devices:

• 3rd Rail Shoe / OHLE Pantagraph to power train and recharge energy storage devices while on eletrified track.
• Diesel Generator to allow the train to have a reansonbly range without requiring excessively large batteries.
• Battery which allows the Diesel Generator to be of lower power (and so smaller/lighter) and operate at a constant power ouput, by having the battery storing energy which is produced by the diesel generator when the required power output of the train is less (e.g. whilst stationary at a station).
• Supercapacitor Regenerates energy during deccelation and stores excess energy from the diesel generator, then discharges during acceleration. The Supercapacitors should be capable of supplying/extracting as much power as an electrified railway.

Transfer the North Downs line to Southern, and the Reading-Redhill stopper can be merged with the Reigate to Victoria service. Southern could also use the quad-mode design of trains on the Uckfield line and the Brighton-Ashford service.

 

[swt_passenger]

Transfer the North Downs line to Southern, and the Reading-Redhill stopper can be merged with the Reigate to Victoria service. Southern could also use the quad-mode design of trains on the Uckfield line and the Brighton-Ashford service.

Or perhaps leave it with GW so that it can be linked across Reading to Oxford, or even to Milton Keynes via EWR?

HarleyDavidson's long running campaign to transfer it to SWT only seems to make sense while it keeps the present end points.

Otherwise you could just end up with people in Bicester asking WTF are SWT (or successor) doing coming along here, getting in everyones way with poor timekeeping well off their own patch...

 

[adrock1976]

Could the Reading - Redhill/Gatwick Airport services be transferred to Southeastern? The Reading - Redhill journeys could continue to Tonbridge and/or Hastings via Edenbridge.

Furthermore, as the Reading, Guildford, and Reigate Railway became a part of the South Eastern Railway, it would put the North Downs route back to how it was historically.

 

[HarleyDavidson]

Or perhaps leave it with GW so that it can be linked across Reading to Oxford, or even to Milton Keynes via EWR?

HarleyDavidson's long running campaign to transfer it to SWT only seems to make sense while it keeps the present end points.

Otherwise you could just end up with people in Bicester asking WTF are SWT (or successor) doing coming along here, getting in everyones way with poor timekeeping well off their own patch...

The only time there was a change to off route running was when for some strange reason one train a day started & terminated at Oxford and that didn't last long because it was always being delayed.

GWR have an absolutely appalling record of timekeeping over the NDL, with delays & cancellations galore and SN have an equally appalling record with their services from Sutton/Victoria & London Bridge to Guildford with late running being the norm.

The stock on the line is pretty much self contained during the day and I don't see any reason to change that, leaving the one a day (if XC bother to turn up with their Newcastle) to make the cross border linkage.

The notion of going to either Oxford or as banded about Newbury, is bizarre to say the least and that will only suffer the same fate as the Oxford service in the past.

Anyway, why shouldn't SWT have to opportunity to take it on & go beyond Reading if offered the opportunity, what's so special that only the likes of GWR & SN can go "Off Network". None whatsoever.

 

[The Ham]

The only time there was a change to off route running was when for some strange reason one train a day started & terminated at Oxford and that didn't last long because it was always being delayed.

GWR have an absolutely appalling record of timekeeping over the NDL, with delays & cancellations galore and SN have an equally appalling record with their services from Sutton/Victoria & London Bridge to Guildford with late running being the norm.

The stock on the line is pretty much self contained during the day and I don't see any reason to change that, leaving the one a day (if XC bother to turn up with their Newcastle) to make the cross border linkage.

The notion of going to either Oxford or as banded about Newbury, is bizarre to say the least and that will only suffer the same fate as the Oxford service in the past.

Anyway, why shouldn't SWT have to opportunity to take it on & go beyond Reading if offered the opportunity, what's so special that only the likes of GWR & SN can go "Off Network". None whatsoever.

Going to Oxford in the future not share the same problems as past services as the junction at Reading is very different now.

Also part of the current bad time keeping is due to the shortage of trains and trains which are fairly short. Between 17:00 and 18:00 at Guildford there are two services one just after 5 and one at 17:44. Unsurprisingly the 17:44 is rather busy and is made worse by the fact that it has come from Gatwick and often has cases on seats and/or blocking doors. Trying to get a lot of people on/off a busy train causes delays, then add in that there's a SWT's service at 17:47 which means that if the 17:44 is just 1 minute late it tends to get held for the SWT's service, and its not surprising that the line doesn't do well. Whoever ran it would still have the same problems.

 

[Kite159]

Going to Oxford in the future not share the same problems as past services as the junction at Reading is very different now.

Also part of the current bad time keeping is due to the shortage of trains and trains which are fairly short. Between 17:00 and 18:00 at Guildford there are two services one just after 5 and one at 17:44. Unsurprisingly the 17:44 is rather busy and is made worse by the fact that it has come from Gatwick and often has cases on seats and/or blocking doors. Trying to get a lot of people on/off a busy train causes delays, then add in that there's a SWT's service at 17:47 which means that if the 17:44 is just 1 minute late it tends to get held for the SWT's service, and its not surprising that the line doesn't do well. Whoever ran it would still have the same problems.

And how many delays are caused with waiting for signals/platform at Redhill to do the reversal?

Back to the new SW franchise, it would be nice to have an hourly service on Sundays for the intermediate stations between Salisbury & Basingstoke, rather than the 2-hourly alternating stopper (giving Andover a clockface timetable as well), as it would boost passenger numbers for those 3 stations

 

[The Ham]

And how many delays are caused with waiting for signals/platform at Redhill to do the reversal?

Back to the new SW franchise, it would be nice to have an hourly service on Sundays for the intermediate stations between Salisbury & Basingstoke, rather than the 2-hourly alternating stopper (giving Andover a clockface timetable as well), as it would boost passenger numbers for those 3 stations

An easy win (once electrification has happened to Salisbury) would be to extend the hourly Basingstoke stoppers (although even those could do with being more frequent on a Sunday, given Farnborough Main has 4tph normally and 1tph on a Sunday). If you extended all of those you could then even then skip some stations between Salisbury and Basingstoke on the existing services speeding up their journey times.

Yes, journey times would be slower (up to 30 minutes) however with a hourly service it would mean that for some it would be better, and depending on which stations are skipped, and when, it may not inconvenience that may people.

It could also happen during the rest of the week so that there were say a fast (as existing) London service every 2 hours from the more minor stations but a half hourly service (Basingstoke stoppers extended to Salisbury, or even on further to Southampton) which enabled people to change at Basingstoke for a faster service on a half hourly frequency as well (i.e. at least 3tph at all stations between Salisbury and Basingstoke with up to 4tph for Salisbury and Andover).

 

[HowardGWR]

Two subjects have been covered here; long distance express trains stopping at every farmyard (e.g. Salisbury to Basingstoke) and lack of inter-regional through trains, particularly to Gatwick (one might have added Heathrow, unless one considers coaches from Woking an adequate provision).

I think both issues are symptomatic of the shortcomings of franchising and are due to London-centric, commuter-oriented franchises.

Perhaps a case for open access franchising, as we see in the NE (and now NW), albeit that they too are London-centric, so far?

 

[swt_passenger]

An easy win (once electrification has happened to Salisbury) would be to extend the hourly Basingstoke stoppers...

Wouldn't it be far easier in the near future just to run the normal Mon - Sat W of E line service from some point on Sunday?

 

[The Ham]

Wouldn't it be far easier in the near future just to run the normal Mon - Sat W of E line service from some point on Sunday?

To extend the Basingstoke stoppers would require 2 extra units (although depending on how long they stop at each end this could be reduced, possibly even down to none), whilst to provide a whole new (hourly) service from Salisbury to Waterloo would require 4 (at a squeeze maybe 3 depending on how long the stop for at each end). Add to that the extra staff for the new service and it all starts to get a tad expensive for relatively little benefit.

As I said, if the Basingstoke stoppers where also extended during the working week it could be a sensible way of increasing train frequencies without increasing the numbers of trains into Waterloo. Which although would not be that helpful for those going to London would be very helpful to those travelling more locally.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---

Two subjects have been covered here; long distance express trains stopping at every farmyard (e.g. Salisbury to Basingstoke) and lack of inter-regional through trains, particularly to Gatwick (one might have added Heathrow, unless one considers coaches from Woking an adequate provision).

I think both issues are symptomatic of the shortcomings of franchising and are due to London-centric, commuter-oriented franchises.

Perhaps a case for open access franchising, as we see in the NE (and now NW), albeit that they too are London-centric, so far?

More none London bound services to increase train frequencies at the more minor stations would be a good thing (such as the Ascot Basingstoke service I have suggested further up). As there are often a lot of people who travel locally on the lines.

Two journey types spring to mind; firstly students who travel around in North Hampshire (between the stations between Andover to Farnborough) for college - Andover College, Basingstoke Colleges (Tech & QMC) and Farnborough Colleges (Tech and 6th form) or those going to private school (Farnborough Hill & Salesian College at Farnborough to name two which are easy to identify).

Secondly, the trains are almost empty as they arrive at Hook in the morning yet a LOT of people who get off at Farnborough (enough that the bridge is difficult to cross against the tide). Although quite a few are students (as identified above) there are still a lot who are not.

 

[HH]

The solution to your power/energy output concern would be to have a quad-mode train which contains the following sources and energy storage devices:

• 3rd Rail Shoe / OHLE Pantagraph to power train and recharge energy storage devices while on eletrified track.
• Diesel Generator to allow the train to have a reansonbly range without requiring excessively large batteries.
• Battery which allows the Diesel Generator to be of lower power (and so smaller/lighter) and operate at a constant power ouput, by having the battery storing energy which is produced by the diesel generator when the required power output of the train is less (e.g. whilst stationary at a station).
• Supercapacitor Regenerates energy during deccelation and stores excess energy from the diesel generator, then discharges during acceleration. The Supercapacitors should be capable of supplying/extracting as much power as an electrified railway.

I know just the guy to make them...

.

 

[Kite159]

An easy win (once electrification has happened to Salisbury) would be to extend the hourly Basingstoke stoppers (although even those could do with being more frequent on a Sunday, given Farnborough Main has 4tph normally and 1tph on a Sunday). If you extended all of those you could then even then skip some stations between Salisbury and Basingstoke on the existing services speeding up their journey times.

Yes, journey times would be slower (up to 30 minutes) however with a hourly service it would mean that for some it would be better, and depending on which stations are skipped, and when, it may not inconvenience that may people.

It could also happen during the rest of the week so that there were say a fast (as existing) London service every 2 hours from the more minor stations but a half hourly service (Basingstoke stoppers extended to Salisbury, or even on further to Southampton) which enabled people to change at Basingstoke for a faster service on a half hourly frequency as well (i.e. at least 3tph at all stations between Salisbury and Basingstoke with up to 4tph for Salisbury and Andover).

Hmm ~90 minutes now on a 2+2 regional express unit compared to 110+ minutes on a 3+2 outer suburban unit fighting with the Surbiton/Walton/Weybridge crowd for a "fast" out of Waterloo.

Would go down like a lead balloon to those paying quite handsomely for a season ticket to London

 

[The Ham]

Hmm ~90 minutes now on a 2+2 regional express unit compared to 110+ minutes on a 3+2 outer suburban unit fighting with the Surbiton/Walton/Weybridge crowd for a "fast" out of Waterloo.

Would go down like a lead balloon to those paying quite handsomely for a season ticket to London

There would still be the faster services, the slower services would just be in addition.

 

[JamesRowden]

The solution to your power/energy output concern would be to have a quad-mode train which contains the following sources and energy storage devices:

• 3rd Rail Shoe / OHLE Pantagraph to power train and recharge energy storage devices while on eletrified track.
• Diesel Generator to allow the train to have a reansonbly range without requiring excessively large batteries.
• Battery which allows the Diesel Generator to be of lower power (and so smaller/lighter) and operate at a constant power ouput, by having the battery storing energy which is produced by the diesel generator when the required power output of the train is less (e.g. whilst stationary at a station).
• Supercapacitor Regenerates energy during deccelation and stores excess energy from the diesel generator, then discharges during acceleration. The Supercapacitors should be capable of supplying/extracting as much power as an electrified railway.

Transfer the North Downs line to Southern, and the Reading-Redhill stopper can be merged with the Reigate to Victoria service. Southern could also use the quad-mode design of trains on the Uckfield line and the Brighton-Ashford service.

I know just the guy to make them...

.

Or you could get me.

 

[HowardGWR]

This doesn't seem sensible response to me.

http://www.middevongazette.co.uk/Waterloo-West-rail-links-backed/story-28184842-detail/story.html?

Campaigners in Mid Devon are keen to see the West's links to Waterloo strengthened. A motion was submitted to Devon County Council's cabinet this week.

Cllr Nick Way's motion called for the provision of a regular service from Barnstaple stopping at stations on the Tarka Line, including Crediton.

Cllr Way, who represents Credition on the county council, submitted the following motion: "Improving travelling choices for rail passengers has long been a goal of this council and it has been an aspiration of many for some considerable time to introduce a regular and seamless Barnstaple to London service on the Tarka Line to serve the various communities, including Crediton, located along the line. The line has seen continuing growth in the numbers of passengers and much new investment to its infrastructure over recent years by Network Rail and the rail operator and an opportunity to introduce this new service now appears to be a real possibility at no extra cost to the public purse; accordingly the County Council will use every endeavour to lobby train operating companies to deliver this service improvement at the earliest opportunity."

The motion was supported by members, and the council declared it would press Devon's MPs to lobby Government direct.

In these days of multiple units, surely someone who wants to travel to London would rather that the train reverses at St Davids and goes to Padddington (a sight quicker). They still would not have to change trains, if that is the main issue.

 

[The Ham]

This doesn't seem sensible response to me.

http://www.middevongazette.co.uk/Waterloo-West-rail-links-backed/story-28184842-detail/story.html?


In these days of multiple units, surely someone who wants to travel to London would rather that the train reverses at St Davids and goes to Padddington (a sight quicker). They still would not have to change trains, if that is the main issue.

Although not overly helpful for travel to London at first glance, it does depend on the timing of arrivals from the Tarka Line and possibly where people are heading to in London. Which could reduce the difference down to a level where people are willing to travel for the extra time (especially if the ticket price via Salisbury is cheaper).

Of course it also opens up the possibility of reducing the number of changes and/or provides better journey options to get to other locations.

 

[HarleyDavidson]

Although not overly helpful for travel to London at first glance, it does depend on the timing of arrivals from the Tarka Line and possibly where people are heading to in London. Which could reduce the difference down to a level where people are willing to travel for the extra time (especially if the ticket price via Salisbury is cheaper).

Of course it also opens up the possibility of reducing the number of changes and/or provides better journey options to get to other locations.

That I would have thought would require an additional depot to be set up at the Exeter end to cater for the early starters & later finishers, it would probably be required should they ever reopen the Okehampton circuit to Plymouth.

 

[HowardGWR]

That I would have thought would require an additional depot to be set up at the Exeter end to cater for the early starters & later finishers, it would probably be required should they ever reopen the Okehampton circuit to Plymouth.

You've left me behind there. What are you talking about here?

 

[HarleyDavidson]

If SW were to gain running rights to Barny, then you'd probably need a small depot down the west end to cover the extending running times and should they ever make up their mind about going back to Plymouth either via Totnes or in the event of Okehampton & Tavistock being linked up again, then you'd probably need a depot down there at Exeter either at Central or Exeter Riverside or such like.

 

[Bob M]

Here are some comments I offered recently to a prospective bidder for the franchise. I have now sent them to the DfT consultation as well.

I live in Christchurch, so my suggestions are mainly concerned with services on the south west main line, particularly in the Christchurch area.

Please could the trains be a bit faster? They are now slower than when the line was first electrified in 1967, in spite of the fact that today’s trains have much better acceleration than those of 1967. The fastest journey from London to Christchurch (104 miles) takes as long as the fastest train from London to York (nearly 200 miles).

As well as taking some of the slack out of the schedule, the fast trains could stop less. Why does Winchester need four trains per hour, when Southampton manages with three? Why do all trains stop at Brockenhurst, when it is no longer the major junction it was pre-Beeching? In fact if the Lymington train were to run through to Southampton, hardly anyone need change there. Then the fast train could run Waterloo, Southampton(Airport and Central), Bournemouth, Poole, then maybe Wareham, Dorchester and Weymouth.

The stopping pattern of the current services make some journeys very long: for example Totton to Christchurch, Christchurch to Woking, or Christchurch to Micheldever. The up stopping train is more or less useless at Christchurch since it is soon overtaken by the following train, meaning that Christchurch effectively has one train per hour towards Southampton.

Travelling west from the Bournemouth area requires changing twice, at Southampton and Salisbury (or Upwey and Castle Cary!). How about a Southampton-Salisbury-Exeter service, and/or Weymouth-Yeovil-Exeter?

Many stations are manned only for very limited hours. As well as providing a limited advice and ticket service for most of the time, at Christchurch this means that the recently refurbished waiting room and toilets are unavailable most of the time.

The current class 444 trains are reasonably good, although the seats are a bit hard and the air conditioning a bit over-enthusiastic and noisy. But the class 450 trains are really not suitable for a long distance service. Currently the Poole stopping service is often a 444, and the fast service is sometimes a 450, especially late at night.

The line goes through two major conurbations: Eastleigh-Southampton and Bournemouth-Poole. The current services make no attempt to provide a good urban train service in these areas. Many stations have just one train per hour – St Denys has two per hour – one minute apart!

 

[HarleyDavidson]

You have to keep the Tories happy, that's why everything has to stop there, there's also a lot of high level railway management live there too.

Have the same problem on the Portsmouth line. Where journey times have gone from 1h 20 to average 1h 30 or more, some trains take well in excess of 2hrs to get from London to South Coast.

I won't use SWT services to the South Coast, because they're so damned appalling, I can drive from Guildford to Portsmouth/Fareham/Southampton QUICKER than the train, courtesy of the A3 Hindhead Tunnel.

The xx:30 from Waterloo to Portsmouth follows a stopping train to Haslemere and it only needs to achieve a 45 mph stagger (if you're lucky) to avoid catching it up & coming to a stand still and even then once you go past Haslemere & Petersfield you're going to 90% of the time get stopped on Havant Jn, whilst the muppets of SN wander leisurely & 99% of the time late across from Chi.

The xx:00 is slightly better, but only until 1500, when the xx:45 becomes all stations from Guildford to serve the brats of the local schools, then it does the same thing as xx:30.

Time to do some radical overhauls of the timetables, because the current ones are the biggest pile of dung going. It's an embarrassment.

Yes I am of an age where I can remember doing a proper 91 headcode, Waterloo - Southampton Airport (Eastleigh) - Southampton - Bournemouth, where the 4-REP was removed and the 33/1 attached and off it went all shacks to Weymouth bar Holton Heath.

The semi-fast 92, was Waterloo - Woking - Basingstoke - Winchester - Eastleigh - Southampton Airport - Southampton - Totton - Lyndhurst Road (Ashurst NF) - Brockenhurst - Sway - New Milton - Christchurch - Bournemouth.

In those days Micheldever, Shawford were served by Thumpers to Portsmouth or peak hour services to London, Swaything & St Denys were served by a 93 headcode service from Waterloo, as were Millbrook, Redbridge & Beaulieu Road.