How is the closure of SSI Redcar the governments fault?
Look at the history of British Steel and Corus...
Oswyntail said:
Perhaps it would appear they "Tory shire councils" are less affected because they know what they are doing and have plans in place for most eventualities.
Or it might be because whilst central Government funding has gone down for northern urban councils (which are predominantly Labour), funding has gone up for the Home Counties shire councils (which are predominantly Conservative).
I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
Why not? After all that is what Leeds did in the 90s when it was dying on its feet - fought for firms to move there, promising financial breaks, available workforce, cheap premises and improved standard of living. That approach is open to S. Yorkshire authorities, but they don't seem to have tried very hard.
Leeds was never struggling, at least not anywhere near the extent of the towns and cities reliant on coal and heavy industry. And I should know- I grew up in Bradford.
Manchester wasn't struggling either, no matter how much they like to pretend they were. The 1996 IRA bomb, from which the insurance money was the catalyst for development, did £1bn damage at today's prices; that level of damage doesn't get inflicted on Skid Row.
Leeds, Manchester, Sheffield, Newcastle and Liverpool have always been important and influential commercial cities, and regeneration was building from a strong base. Rotherham, Doncaster and Sunderland, er, haven't.
The word "menial" does betray a certain approach. Call centres not good enough?
They're not stable employment opportunities, as we've seen by the fact the jobs have all been moved to India the second the
bribes were stopped
the investment came to an end.