• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ECML Cable Thief Jailed

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,417
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Being deprived of nine months of your life is pretty significant, surely? It's not as if they gave him a slap on the wrist and told him not to do it again.

More so at 48 rather than to one aged 18. I wonder if he is a habitual petty criminal of the type portrayed so well by Ronnie Barker as Norman Stanley Fletcher in "Porridge" ?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,909
Location
Fenny Stratford
Firstly it is a good thing this criminal has been caught, tried, convicted and sentanced but it didn't take long for the usual wibblers to appear with their, at best, tentative grasp of the criminal justice system............

Much as i detest criminals I do wonder how many of the "lock them away for ever brigade" are the same people who complain about prisons being built near them or their tax rises to fund them or the impact on their house price etc.

In the big picture these crimes are minor thefts but terribly inconvenient and expensive to rectify.

This is the UK, we are not permitted to have adequate deterrents for this sort of crime.

What do you propose as an adequate deterrent for a minor theft? Birching? Stoning? 57 years imprisonment?

Sting him for repair costs and delay repay costs as well as any lost revenue caused by people deciding not to travel.

yes he should be able to pay those back quite quickly shouldn't he? £5 per week for the next 45679 years ought to do it :roll:
 

ian959

Member
Joined
9 May 2009
Messages
483
Location
Perth, Western Australia
What do you propose as an adequate deterrent for a minor theft? Birching? Stoning? 57 years imprisonment?

Caning seems to be quite an effective deterrent in Singapore...

Equally, chopping off a hand would perhaps be as effective. Not sure how effective that is in Muslim countries but it might be worth a try. Especially if they cannot get disability benefits after the event :)
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,417
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
I am finding it difficult to reconcile the phrase "minor theft" and the financial costs incurred in operational problems and of the ensuing travelling delays caused by such a "minor theft".

I am sure we have some forum members with legalistic knowledge who can fully explain matters.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,909
Location
Fenny Stratford
I am finding it difficult to reconcile the phrase "minor theft" and the financial costs incurred in operational problems and of the ensuing travelling delays caused by such a "minor theft".

I am sure we have some forum members with legalistic knowledge who can fully explain matters.

Legally speaking it is a minor and straight forward theft of low value equipment.

You were the one indicated the punishment should fit the crime: 9 months seems a fitting sentence for such a theft based on the existing sentencing guidelines etc.
 
Last edited:

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,518
Location
Southampton
Presumably the law can only deal with the damage caused to physical property. Consequential losses by delay minutes would have to be recovered by suing the convicted, I guess?
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
3,281
Location
East Midlands
Personally I'd favour the creation of a new offence of "Sabotage of Live Infrastructure", covering the Electricity, Gas, Water, Telecoms, and Railway networks, to be used where theft causes disruption to any of these important services.

Then it would be possible to fully reflect in the sentencing the difference in impact between a simple theft (e.g. of a reel of unconnected cable) and the kind of disruption caused by theft of 'live' cable or other similar offences.

Hopefully thieves would realize that the punishment for live cable theft was so serious that at the very least they would do their thieving elsewhere in some much less disruptive way...
 

Pinza-C55

Member
Joined
23 May 2015
Messages
1,035
Personally I'd favour the creation of a new offence of "Sabotage of Live Infrastructure", covering the Electricity, Gas, Water, Telecoms, and Railway networks, to be used where theft causes disruption to any of these important services.

Then it would be possible to fully reflect in the sentencing the difference in impact between a simple theft (e.g. of a reel of unconnected cable) and the kind of disruption caused by theft of 'live' cable or other similar offences.

Hopefully thieves would realize that the punishment for live cable theft was so serious that at the very least they would do their thieving elsewhere in some much less disruptive way...

Yes, much like interfering with the Mail is viewed as a more serious crime than common theft. After all these cable thefts could potentially lead to loss of life for rail passengers.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Being deprived of nine months of your life is pretty significant, surely? It's not as if they gave him a slap on the wrist and told him not to do it again.

Yes I think the sentence is reasonable and even if he is released early he will still be serving the rest of the sentence in the community and will be subject to certain conditions
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,641
Location
Nottingham
Yes, much like interfering with the Mail is viewed as a more serious crime than common theft. After all these cable thefts could potentially lead to loss of life for rail passengers.

Very unlikely. Signalling is designed so failure of any component including cable will put the signals to red or in worst case black, and stop any affected trans. It would need a further event such as an error in handsignalling to cause an accident, or an extremely unlikely false feed when cutting the cable.
 

Pinza-C55

Member
Joined
23 May 2015
Messages
1,035
Very unlikely. Signalling is designed so failure of any component including cable will put the signals to red or in worst case black, and stop any affected trans. It would need a further event such as an error in handsignalling to cause an accident, or an extremely unlikely false feed when cutting the cable.

Not impossible though. The history of railway accidents is filled with events which were unlikely.
 

CheesyChips

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
217
If the gov't insist that we all need to get out of our cars and onto public transport then they're going to have to provide a more appropriate deterrent than that. 9 months custodial really means a couple of weeks inside and an apology from society for letting them down.

"Prime Minister, we can't use the railway because people keep walking off with bits of it".
 

stut

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
1,924
Remember all these puns the next time you are stuck on the train for 2 hours because some lowlife has nicked the cable

I will. Humour is a great way of coping with stressful situations. You should try it.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
I will. Humour is a great way of coping with stressful situations. You should try it.

I work on the railways, you have to have a sense of humour, plus my 'couldnt give a t#ss' attitube means l don't suffer from stress! ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top