backontrack
Established Member
Horsley
...or not.
Micheldever
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Next leg to start at Chichester
HALT CALLED
The setter of new leg has to wait for 15 minutes or for three postings to be made. Have a look at the times of the first three postings made on this very short leg.
Well, it's all in the past now. I edited my comment to just a simple 'deleted - too early' but then reinstated it after noticing your posting of Barnham.Oops sorry[emoji23]
Oddly enough, Tim sent me a PM about this, but he then followed on to my posting anyway.
The sequence of events are as follows:-
1144 backontrack starts a new leg with Winchester
1146 TimsYoung40145 responds with Basingstoke
1147 backontrack claims the win (not complying with the rules about leg-winners) with Micheldever.....then starts a new leg at Chichester
Well, it's all in the past now. I edited my comment to just a simple 'deleted - too early' but then reinstated it after noticing your posting of Barnham.
Can't we just continue just this once?
Reading (A Long Wait)
My response is whilst nothing can normally be done after a leg has been completed, this does NOT apply to a leg of three postings where the rules have been infringed.
Therefore, my adjudication is that the three postings leg ONLY should all be struck-through and the current leg commencing with Chichester should be allowed to stand.
Tilehurst
Just out of interest, will I still be able to claim those three points?
Just out of interest, will I still be able to claim those three points?
Not at all. Count yourself lucky that you are not sent to jail, not allowed to pass "GO" and be fined £200.
I'd say not. Other people might go actively abuse this loophole otherwise (in the future).
Is this a serious posting?![]()