• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why Can't First Get the Air-Con to Work on Their 158's?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Envoy

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2014
Messages
3,158
First use 3 car 158's on the Portsmouth to Cardiff route - which also suffers from overcrowding. Yesterday, the first one I travelled on had only 1 coach with working air-conditioning. On my return trip, all 3 coaches had failed air conditioning. (It is really noisy going through the long Severn Tunnel with open windows with fumes seeping in as well)!

Is maintenance at First 'slack' or is this a common problem with other operators of 158's? Not looking good to have one working out of 6 coaches.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
This is a problem that has existed with 158s in many TOCs for 25 years since the 158s have been in existence and has still not been solved. However, I think it may be SWT who have a different system production whose Air-Con works satisfactorily. We keep hearing the same drivel over and over again re investigating the problem but nothing seems to change. It is nothing to do primarily with FGW or in anyway connected with their lack of maintenance but a design matter. Reading through recent ATW & FGW Twitters they are full of passengers complaining about this.
I can't turn a link up at the moment but this issue has been discussed time and time again on the Forum
 
Last edited:

itsjamierawr

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
92
Location
Leeds
From what I heard there's two different systems, there's one which SWT/EMT use that works ok most of the time and there's the original? The issue with the original is that it relied on CFC Gases which were banned in the 90s I believe, so replacement gases didn't work as well with the old system. People on here also bring up issues with the shutdown procedure causing problems with it (if someone just cuts the engine then it can screw up the A/C for the next time), thermostats in vestibules/guards not being able to reset the system if it trips etc etc - are all things I've read whenever these issues come up (every summer!)
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Surely this is an issue for the leasing company because they can fit a different system to their trains if they wish rather more than the TOCs because they cant!
 

ashworth

Established Member
Joined
10 Sep 2008
Messages
1,285
Location
Notts
An elderly relative of mine travelled on an EMT 158 from Norwich to Nottingham with no air conditioning working on that really hot day a couple of weeks ago when outside temperatures were approx 35 degrees. I think it was the 1157 departure from Norwich to Liverpool and so at midday the temperature in the train with the sun shining through the windows would have been quite unbearable. She said that herself and a number of others were feeling quite ill by the time they reached Nottingham after 2 and a half hours of intense heat. I told her to put in a complaint but I don't think she did.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,017
Location
here to eternity
Surely this is an issue for the leasing company because they can fit a different system to their trains if they wish rather more than the TOCs because they cant!

Easy solution - fit windows that open. I'm sick of these private companies raking in massive profits whilst sitting on their hands in sorting out air conditioning that is obviously not fit for purpose.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Easy solution - fit windows that open. I'm sick of these private companies raking in massive profits whilst sitting on their hands in sorting out air conditioning that is obviously not fit for purpose.

I will try to answer this in words of one sillybull because you obviously didnt understand the previous answer! :roll:

The train firm can not change the spec of the train, that is done by the firm who own the train, this is called the train leasing company, if the firm that run the trains, this is called the Train Operating Company or (TOC) want to change things they need to ask the firm that own the train to do it for them. The owner will then charge the TOC more money to pay for it.

IE no TOC can make material differences to any of the leased assets (whether that be changing the air con modules or fitting extra opening windows) the leasing company will have to carry out the work and will then charge the TOC extra.
 
Last edited:

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
3,272
And even if the TOC thinks it is a good idea, any significant extra cost on a vehicle lease (in a franchised TOC) has to go through the DfT for approval because of the possible effect on a future franchise.

If the DfT don't think it is value for money, then the mod won't get done.
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,493
Location
Yorkshire
Northern also have the same problem (not the best comparison, granted, given not much Northern have works!) each summer, and I was also of the belief it was a general issue with 158s specifically.

You can tell which units have different air con modules as they have different vents on the roof IIRC

I also believe the CFC gases got banned just as the 158s came out, so have probably never worked properly
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,946
Location
UK
Why doesn't the TOC refuse to pay the full leasing charge until the air conditioning is fixed to a satisfactory standard? Surely TOCs have some powers to get what they're paying for?

That might prod the ROSCO into taking action.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
3,272
Because, under the terms of the lease they have no power to withhold lease payments and it will be an event of default if they do so.

The performance of rolling stock is very rarely covered in rolling stock leases. This was quite deliberate policy dating back to 1994 so as to keep the ROSCOs from pricing performance risk into the lease price.
 

Parallel

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2013
Messages
4,534
The performance of the aircon on FGW's 158s is really poor. I could probably count on one hand the amount of times that all three carriages have had working aircon the last couple of months. Some days, it's been unbearable. This has been going on long enough now, and whoever is responsible needs to sort it - I prefer travelling on 150s where possible.

As others have said, Arriva's aren't much better. Was regularly using trains on the Cambrian lines a few weeks ago. Was about a 50/50 split of whether it was functioning or not.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,946
Location
UK
Because, under the terms of the lease they have no power to withhold lease payments and it will be an event of default if they do so.

The performance of rolling stock is very rarely covered in rolling stock leases. This was quite deliberate policy dating back to 1994 so as to keep the ROSCOs from pricing performance risk into the lease price.
Madness. The ROSCOs must be well chuffed as that's quite ridiculous!
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
3,272
It's the same with NR too. The artificial nature of railway contracts amazes those who are used to dealing with contracts in the "outside world"!
 

scotraildriver

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2009
Messages
1,847
Scotrail currently have an all new snazzy Air con control unit on trial in 2 units and so far it seems to be working well. So there may be hope.

Whilst the air con in 158's can be unreliable, sometimes the faults are due to poor design. For example the control units have 4 big multi plugs in them for the senors/power etc which often simply come loose and fall out. Unfortunately some tocs have put tamperproof covers on which prevent traincrew fixing it. Secondly the sensor for the saloon temp is right above one of the hopper windows so if the window is open even a fraction the cold air blowing in makes the a/c think its cold and puts the heating on. Finally simply tripping and resetting the a/c circuit breaker often gets it going. All in all its not the best system but I think giving crews a bit more training on it could solve a good number of issues. But that costs time and money!
 

Envoy

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2014
Messages
3,158
Scotrail currently have an all new snazzy Air con control unit on trial in 2 units and so far it seems to be working well. So there may be hope.

Whilst the air con in 158's can be unreliable, sometimes the faults are due to poor design. For example the control units have 4 big multi plugs in them for the senors/power etc which often simply come loose and fall out. Unfortunately some tocs have put tamperproof covers on which prevent traincrew fixing it. Secondly the sensor for the saloon temp is right above one of the hopper windows so if the window is open even a fraction the cold air blowing in makes the a/c think its cold and puts the heating on. Finally simply tripping and resetting the a/c circuit breaker often gets it going. All in all its not the best system but I think giving crews a bit more training on it could solve a good number of issues. But that costs time and money!

That would be time well spent - if the crews were able to fix failed air cons. I wonder what proportion of these failed air cons could be fixed by tech savvy crews? As someone remarked earlier, elderly people were getting 'distressed' on one train on a very hot day. What will it take to get something done about this - a death?
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,370
Location
Yorkshire
This year, I've noticed Northern 158s seem to be more likely to have working aircon than in previous years.
 

ashworth

Established Member
Joined
10 Sep 2008
Messages
1,285
Location
Notts
This year, I've noticed Northern 158s seem to be more likely to have working aircon than in previous years.

I agree.
On the last Saturday in June, which was quite a hot day, I made use of one of the £12.50 Northern Day Rovers with newspaper tokens.
Travelling from Alfreton to Sheffield, Sheffield to Bridlington, Bridlington to Scarborough, Scarborough to Meadowhall and Meadowhall to Alfreton on 5 different Northern 158's. All had very good air conditioning and indeed some were a bit too cool at times! For all that people may say about Northern, I actually find their 158's quite comfortable for long journeys.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,651
Location
Hampshire
I would give you an answer but the best answer I've seen was posted in this thread by Best Western a few years ago about the same issue.

Class 158 air-con

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This extract is copied over from a reply on another thread; it is undoubtably the most informed and thorough answer to the perpetual question of why is Class 158 air-con always crap I thought it was well worth sharing as others on this thread have asked this question many a time.

[If the poster from the other forum objects please post it here and I (or the mods!) will immediately edit this thread and remove. Thanks].

The 158s have three systems fitted; Temperature (formerly part of Westinghouse, but now all parts are overhauled by Pullmans AC of Durham), Ebac & Liebherr.

The Temperature is the as-built system, and is a large capacity split system, with the hydrostatically powered Condenser/Compressor module underframe and two Evaporator/Heat exchanger modules in the roof spaces above each vestibule. The refrigerant ('gas') it originally used was made illegal, so the systems were unable to be used for a while, but most have now been converted to R134A type refrigerant so are usable again.

The Liebherr is the retro-fitted system, and consists of two self-contained cooling/heating roof modules, one per vestibule and an underframe mounted 'wedge' module containing 3-phase alternator providing power to the roof modules.

Both systems are controlled from a 'Mircopac' control unit, located in the SMS bulkhead cupboard in the #1 vestibule, which takes all the vehicle and sensor inputs to controls the system, using the bank of relays/contactors below the Micropac.

The Ebac system is a modified Temperature system, with reliability modifications to the underframe module and evaporator fans/duct work, along with a different, more user-friendly ACCU (Air Conditioning Control Unit) made by Ebac.

For both the Temperature & Liebherr systems under normal 'in traffic' conditions, the Micropac defaults to Auto, which is designed to automatically maintain the ambient temperature within the saloon to 21 degrees, by using cooling/heating blending aswell as venting. The Ebac systems micro controller unit also does this.

The differance between the Temperature/Ebac and the Liebherr systems is that the Temperature system is very large split system that contains alot of refrigerant ('gas') and has a lot of pipework and connections, so there is huge potential for leaks, meaning refrigerant can be easily lost. Whilst the system when it works is very efficient and can cool the saloon in a very short space of time, its other main vulnerability is that due to its nature, the system must pump down before the engine is shut down or else liquid refrigerant can be trapped in the system, which hydraulic locks and thus damages the Compressor when it is next started up. The 158s have an interlock where by when the cab engine STOP button is pressed (or the desk has been keyed out for 15mins), the engine is prevented from shutting down, and the A/C system will immediately begin to pump down if required and once this is completed, it will then allow the engine to shut down. This can be bypassed by pressing and holding the cab STOP button for

more than 5 secs or so, or by pressing the local STOP buttons on the underframe.or by the operation of the Fire test button. The engine will also immediately shut down in the event of low oil pressure,low coolant & loss of fire system integrity, in which case the A/C system reliability is scarified for safety purposes.

I cannot emphasise enough how important it is that the A/C system is allowed to pump down prior to shut down to ensure it does not get damaged unless in an emergency, and whilst most drivers are aware of this and when leaving a unit, press STOP once then key out and let the unit shut down in its own time, i all to often witness drivers, especially on depot, pressing and holding the STOP button while the A/C is still running in cooling. Literally one or two shut downs carried out without pumping down can destroy the compressor and render the system useless!!

I have scalded several drivers in the past who mindlessly hold the STOP button when bringing units in from service or moving spare units around the depot, it is just plain laziness. I am not sure if drivers are still trained on this point when learning/refreshing 158s as traction, but please drivers take this on board if you drive 158s/159s!!!

The Liebherr system has self-contained modules, which carry much less refrigerant all in the roof space and are powered by the 3-phase alternator which takes the place of the original underframe module. This make them much more reliable, as long as the alternator is functioning correctly, but even this system must be allowed to pump down before engine shutdown, but the time taken is considerably shorter.

The fundamental vulnerability of all system is that the Compressor/Condenser fan on the Temperature/Ebac systems and the alternator or the Liebherr system are all powered by the common Hydrostatic system that also powers the Radiator fan & main alternator, so if the 'serck' fluid is lost through a leak or hose failure or the main hydraulic VD pump fails, no power is available to either of the systems.

Resetting the system using the 'RESET' button generally does nothing and clearing the fault codes has no effect on the operation of the system, it meerly erases the stored record of High/low pressure faults, meaning that maintenance staff cannot recall the faults to see what had occurred in traffic.

All systems will default to Auto, even after being powered on/off via the ACIS (A/C isolation switch or by operating the ACCB (A/C Circuit Breaker) on the cab bulkhead behind the driver. The system will always try to regulate no matter what, and the only thing that will upset it is if the Micropac itself is faulty (very rare) or one of its 4 temperature sensors, E1 (Evap 1), E2 (Evap 2), AA (Ambient Air) or SS (Supply Sensor) is faulty and reading high/low, and in these circumstances the system gets confused and will try to heat (or even cool) when it is not required, hence making things uncomfortable and overworking itself, often causing more damage. If the system has low no refrigerant, it will still ask for cooling, but will often immediately trip out on Low Pressure and rest, then try again. The best thing to do in this case is isolate the system using the ACIS and open the hopper windows, as otherwise the system will just constantly fight itself.

On FGW west fleet, we have a mixture of Liebherr and Temperature systems (Plus 158798 with Ebac) and we had a campaign this summer to get maximum possible availability. So far, we are so far achieving a pretty good percentage (about 75% when I last checked), minus the unavoidable in-traffic failures and we also have a few vehicles with systems that require major/long-term repairs which are being planned in and stopped when fleet availability permits (ie. after the summer timetable! - crazy i know, but unfortunately our fleet just isnt big enough.....)

We have found that often train crew who believe they are helping actually hinder and cause more problems (as in a post above, where 'resetting' the system literally achieves nothing whatsoever!!!!). We have also seen cases of vandalism, where the Micropac keypads and displays have been 'T-Keyed' or wiring connectors/plugs dislodged/detached, which we assume is only carried out by certain train crew for reasons unbeknown to any of us.

To combat this, as the 158 feet goes through a Reliability Modification program, we are fitting locks to the SMS cupboard that only maintenance staff have keys to and a viewing panel is being cut into the cupboard door to allow train crew to view the Micropac display and see what the current temperature is and what the A/C is currently doing (Vent/Heating/Preheating/Cooling 1/2/3/ etc.) and any A/C isolations that are required will be carried out by maintenance staff or RSIs/Mob Techs.

Hope this explains things a bit, sorry its abit long-winded, but there is no real simple explanation to your question!!

Regards to all, BW.

http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=51382
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
Easy solution - fit windows that open. I'm sick of these private companies raking in massive profits whilst sitting on their hands in sorting out air conditioning that is obviously not fit for purpose.

There are windows that open on 158's. And 150's and 153's, neither of which have AC...
 

Envoy

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2014
Messages
3,158
I agree.
On the last Saturday in June, which was quite a hot day, I made use of one of the £12.50 Northern Day Rovers with newspaper tokens.
Travelling from Alfreton to Sheffield, Sheffield to Bridlington, Bridlington to Scarborough, Scarborough to Meadowhall and Meadowhall to Alfreton on 5 different Northern 158's. All had very good air conditioning and indeed some were a bit too cool at times! For all that people may say about Northern, I actually find their 158's quite comfortable for long journeys.

So, it would seem that Northern are following the correct procedures to 'look after' the Air Con & FGW are not? As is stated in the technical information in the previous post, the AC system could be damaged by drivers holding the engine shut button too long (5 secs) causing an immediate engine shut down rather than a delayed shutdown (1 quick press) which keeps the engine running whilst the Air Con system shuts down thus protecting the compressor.
 

scotraildriver

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2009
Messages
1,847
Unfortunately waiting 15 minutes for the engine to shut down is often totally impractical. We have up ton 15 158s coming on depot each night and having to wait for each one to shut down before fuelling would cause a backlog onto the main line and waste almost 4 hours per night waiting. It is a stupid impractical system that no other train is saddled with.
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Unfortunately waiting 15 minutes for the engine to shut down is often totally impractical. We have up ton 15 158s coming on depot each night and having to wait for each one to shut down before fuelling would cause a backlog onto the main line and waste almost 4 hours per night waiting. It is a stupid impractical system that no other train is saddled with.
Is there a way they could use a battery supply to power the air con whilst it goes through its shutdown procedure, to allow the engine to be shut down quicker without breaking the compressor?
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,926
Where I work guards have the maintenance codes and can adjust the system to an extent. Unfortunately however some new guards seem to have been let down by their trainers and keep doing daft things. IE opening the windows in both vehicles if one is knackered, opening the windows but leaving the system in cooling mode, not waiting a little while on startup to see if it will start working having been switched off for hours before declaring it knackered etc. Whenever I take over a 158 I have a walk through before I do anything else to see how the HVAC is doing. Unless it's already in the book as confirmed dead or there's the telltale purple stains all over the vestibule roof where a coolant hose has burst I try resetting any duff units once and it works surprisingly often.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,940
Location
Fenny Stratford
I agree that Northern seem to be doing better with 158 a/c this summer.

The systems as described in that fascinating post above sound dreadful. Automotive and building systems seem highly tolerant of random power cuts (indeed the last one I used had a warning in the instructions about how it wouldn't do anything for several minutes after being stopped, in order to protect the compressor).

This year, I've noticed Northern 158s seem to be more likely to have working aircon than in previous years.

I was on a Northern 158/9 the other weekend and the HVAC had failed. It was pumping out hot air. The guard shut it down and opened the windows. It took ages to cool down

Madness. The ROSCOs must be well chuffed as that's quite ridiculous!

welcome to the privitised railway ;)
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,761
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Unfortunately waiting 15 minutes for the engine to shut down is often totally impractical

If (and it is if) that is the cause of failing 158 aircon, then the railway needs to find an appropriate procedure rather than cooking passengers, or to fork out (as fGW is here) for a system that is not sensitive to such misuse.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,424
Location
UK
I don't think this problem is confined to 158s, 166s also suffer from broken air-con.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top