• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Creation of class 230 DEMUs from ex-LU D78s by Vivarail

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

martynbristow

Member
Joined
15 Jun 2005
Messages
426
Location
Birkenhead
Aerodynamics aren't really an issue at the sort of speeds the D78 will run at.

Aerodynamics will affect the front and rear of the train primarily but it will have a huge effect if the trains push above 50. The turbulence around the doors will cause damage potentially when 2 trains pass.
With side plates over door controls it'll be aesthetics and protection of the body work
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,719
Location
Scotland
The turbulence around the doors will cause damage potentially when 2 trains pass.
Not likely. Compared to the amount of disturbance caused by the front and the inter-carriage gaps, the turbulence caused by a the door panels would be almost impossible to measure.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
all the 100mph mark 3 EMUs have recessed doors, as do the 140mph Class 395s and so will the Class 800/801. Less doors admittedly, but aerodynamically, what's the difference between a door and a blank panel?
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
all the 100mph mark 3 EMUs have recessed doors, as do the 140mph Class 395s and so will the Class 800/801. Less doors admittedly, but aerodynamically, what's the difference between a door and a blank panel?

Presumably a very slight advantage in that a blank panel would be fully sealed in to place?
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
Will the alternative issue of being more aesthetically visually pleasing be acceptable in the side bodyshell to which I so alluded.

No

The portals, although sealed, have industrial character and symmetry . You wouldn't render a historic home to hide the stone windows, so why try and hide a feature from the past on a train?
 

Haydn1971

Established Member
Joined
11 Dec 2012
Messages
2,101
Location
Sheffield
...plus a permanent sealing up would limit further changes to suit new services - i.e. Going back from four doors per carriage to eight.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,461
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
No

The portals, although sealed, have industrial character and symmetry . You wouldn't render a historic home to hide the stone windows, so why try and hide a feature from the past on a train?

I am glad that someone had said this in a posting. Perhaps Vivarail's insistence that "new build" is the correct terminology now needs showing up for the fallacy that it actually is.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,722
Location
Croydon
I am glad that someone had said this in a posting. Perhaps Vivarail's insistence that "new build" is the correct terminology now needs showing up for the fallacy that it actually is.

It would be rather stupid to seal up the unused doorways *IF* that meant the windows in the doors were effectively lost. In the interests of saving money I see no point worrying about the aesthetics of two out of use doorways which arguably look better left in situ rather than hidden. It is not even worth the wear and tear on my keyboard as the affect on performance will be negligible. Especially if one day an operator decides they wish to use those doors for a more metro type of working.

It is good to see there is nothing more significant to worry about regarding this project ;).
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,721
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It would be rather stupid to seal up the unused doorways *IF* that meant the windows in the doors were effectively lost. In the interests of saving money I see no point worrying about the aesthetics of two out of use doorways which arguably look better left in situ rather than hidden. It is not even worth the wear and tear on my keyboard as the affect on performance will be negligible. Especially if one day an operator decides they wish to use those doors for a more metro type of working.

Given that there are barely two windows of the same size on a purpose built Class 185, I don't think this even enters the radar of actually being a problem.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
There must therefore be other similarly aged DMU stock that can also be converted in the same way?

There are no spare DMUs of any kind. If there were, this project wouldn't even be under consideration.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,436
Apparently Bombardier have offered a DEMU version of the Electrostar to bidders. Possibly that's the most cost effective option considering the order might only be for 120 carriages, while the 172 doesn't comply, Aventra only exists on paper and Movia hasn't been designed for National Rail.
If Aventra (spelling doesn't look right!) really exists only on paper then the Thameslink project is well and truly screwed... of course your statement may just be wrong particularly given that Bombardier have stated that no more Electrostars will be built....
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
If Aventra (spelling doesn't look right!)

Tell Bombardier they've got it wrong then: http://uk.bombardier.com/en/transportation/presence-in-country/future-concepts-projects.html

really exists only on paper then the Thameslink project is well and truly screwed...

As Thameslink is getting Desiros I think it's Crossrail that'll be affected ;)

of course your statement may just be wrong particularly given that Bombardier have stated that no more Electrostars will be built....

Given a 172 is a Turbostar and a 379 is an Electrostar, maybe a DEMU would have a different name again even if it's based on an older design?
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,436

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,461
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
The portals, although sealed, have industrial character and symmetry . You wouldn't render a historic home to hide the stone windows, so why try and hide a feature from the past on a train?

So your contention is that these so-called "new build" units that Vivarail seem to feel fit for the 21st century should have arcane railway carriage features incorporated into their design.

Name me any other "new build" manufacturer whose design department will see the advantage of bringing a new design to the railway market that incorporates features from the previous century that is a legacy of these NOT being new-build units
 
Last edited:

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,721
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Name me any other "new build" manufacturer whose design department will see the advantage of bringing a new design to the railway market that incorporates features from the previous century.

Fake wood on tables? But seriously, it's more the case that there is no disadvantage to leaving them there (provided they are sealed against draughts) than there being an advantage to having them in and of itself.
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
So your contention is that these so-called "new build" units that Vivarail seem to feel fit for the 21st century should have arcane railway carriage features incorporated into their design.

Name me any other "new build" manufacturer whose design department will see the advantage of bringing a new design to the railway market that incorporates features from the previous century.

Bombardier and Alstom install windows on their units.

There isn't any need really. If you look at the "Harry Potter" train at the theme park, you'll find it has no windows but a display screen installed inside where windows would be to give the illusion of travelling through the Highlands.

Just think how much better the lives enthusiasts would be if the Pendolino had been designed without any windows but with seats perfectly aligned with display screens instead?

Even for ordinary commuters, on winters nights the screens could display a balmy summer evening helping to mitigate against SAD.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,722
Location
Croydon
To avoid the risks associated with SAD there must be such a season proof window for the driver as well :lol:.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Bombardier and Alstom install windows on their units.

There isn't any need really. If you look at the "Harry Potter" train at the theme park, you'll find it has no windows but a display screen installed inside where windows would be to give the illusion of travelling through the Highlands.

Just think how much better the lives enthusiasts would be if the Pendolino had been designed without any windows but with seats perfectly aligned with display screens instead?

Even for ordinary commuters, on winters nights the screens could display a balmy summer evening helping to mitigate against SAD.

Don't knock it, probably way it will be on planes eventually. Replacing windows with screens and external cameras saves a lot of weight.
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
2,053
Certain types of aircraft have had "out the front" views available on seat-back TVs for years.......
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Don't knock it, probably way it will be on planes eventually. Replacing windows with screens and external cameras saves a lot of weight.

"This is your captain speaking. The route we'll be taking goes across an Ocean for hundreds of miles, which gets boring after a while so we'll be projecting some more interesting views on to the windows at regular intervals."
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,821
"This is your captain speaking. The route we'll be taking goes across an Ocean for hundreds of miles, which gets boring after a while so we'll be projecting some more interesting views on to the windows at regular intervals."

You mean like this?
technico-windowless.jpg


I don't understand Pauls objection to them just sealing up the unused doors and keeping the windows in. That's if I understood that correctly
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,722
Location
Croydon
Ah glory be. From the above I can see a big step forward. Its quite possible that a seat back projection could include a fake interior of the train giving an illusion of space and/or nicer looking passengers and clean shag pile carpets. Plus, for the D-78s, this could include scenes of rolling Berkshire/Hampshire countryside instead of grim satanic mills. And with screens this big it would be feasible to clearly indicate every station name bracketed with "Welcome To XXXXX home of the blah blah blah". Struggling towns could pay to advertise their attractions up to 100 miles (1000 miles in the case of services up North) before the actual station.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Ah glory be. From the above I can see a big step forward. Its quite possible that a seat back projection could include a fake interior of the train giving an illusion of space and/or nicer looking passengers and clean shag pile carpets. Plus, for the D-78s, this could include scenes of rolling Berkshire/Hampshire countryside instead of grim satanic mills. And with screens this big it would be feasible to clearly indicate every station name bracketed with "Welcome To XXXXX home of the blah blah blah". Struggling towns could pay to advertise their attractions up to 100 miles (1000 miles in the case of services up North) before the actual station.

They might finish up being used in the South. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top