Why do I get the feeling that somebody tried to be clever and failed miserably, there is quite a lot of inaccurate info in the OP (train arrival time etc) so what else is wrong?
An honest question - would Section 3 even apply? It says "If you cannot buy an appropriate ticket..." - in this case the OP could buy an appropriate ticket for a journey to Luton Parkway, they just chose not to.Under section 3 of the National Rail Conditions of Carriage, you are permitted to buy a ticket covering only part of your journey if (and only if) tickets you want are not available for purchase at the origin station, as long as you purchase the rest of of the tickets or part-exchange to the correct ticket at the first reasonable opportunity.
An honest question - would Section 3 even apply? It says "If you cannot buy an appropriate ticket..." - in this case the OP could buy an appropriate ticket for a journey to Luton Parkway, they just chose not to.
Where does the line fall between an 'appropriate ticket' and 'the ticket you want'? It's clear in the case of things like evening Rovers that aren't sold from TVMs, but surely if there's a standard ticket available to your destination you're obliged to purchase it?
Why didn't you buy your St Albans-Luton Airport Parkway ticket the same time as you bought your first ticket?
Any station can sell a ticket to or from any destination. Alternatively you may wish to purchase on-line and collect them from the ticket vending machine. You can collect tickets from any TVM linked to the network (which is virtually all of them).
The station was close and there was only a machine, which only sold tickets from Bearsted
And did the machine there have the option to purchase a ticket to your final destination?
The machine did sell tickets to Luton Parkway. I was just trying to save money but I wanted to pay for the whole of the journey. I really and honestly did not want to defraud the operator but pay the best fare offered.
Irrelevant. The passenger wanted to split their journey in accordance with the NRCoC. The TVM was unable to sell the appropriate tickets and it has already been established the ticket office was closed, so no opportunity to buy the appropriate fare was presented at Bearsted. What about those TVMs that won't sell a full range of tickets limiting passengers to the most expensive options when cheaper tickets are available? By your logic these passengers have no right to the cheaper tickets.
The sticking point is why the OP failed to purchase the second half en route. The OP claims they had no intention to defraud, so we wait to hear why the OP did not actively approach a guard on route or why they didn't use facilities at interchange stations.
The reason I said it was irrelevant was because it has already been established that the Bearsted TVM was unable to offer a full range of tickets the OP wanted. I obviously misinterpreted what you said as it appeared as if you were suggesting that passengers are only entitled to the tickets offered by TVMs, even when TVMs do not offer the full range of available tickets. I'm sorry if I read top much into it - the inherent danger of online communication!
Thanks for the response.
I did not see any guards on either train and at Blackfriers sometime the train from Bearsted is delayed and or an earlier train is delayed going to Luton Parkway so they arrive and depart at similar times. I cannot remember that day but I believe that there was not much gap in the arrival and departure.
I sought to buy a ticket at Luton I did not go to the barriers but to a window that appeared to be an access fare point.
With the very long platforms at Blackfriers and the close arrival and departure of trains due to lateness going either way, I did not think that there was opportunity to buy at Blackfriers without fear of delay.
Fahad:2091998 said:Very sorry, I think you may be correct: legislation.gov.uk states that the sections mandating fraudulent intent were repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1892. Said site does not contain the Statute Law Revision Act 1892, but irishstatutebook.ie says that the SLRA 1892 repealed s. 103 up 'to “thereof, or” where those words last occur.'. The SLRA 1892 was repealed in its entirety by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1998 here. I was confused because legislation.gov.uk has updated the RCCA for the 1892 repeal, but not again for the 1998 repeal of the repeal.
I use Blackfriars every day. In order to buy a ticket there the OP would have had to:
1) Walk half the lenght of Blackfriard Bridge
2) Descend 82 steps
3) Explain to the gateline staff that he was breaking his journey to buy a ticket
4) Go to the ticket office and join the queue
5) Buy a ticket
6) Explain to the gateline staff that he had broken his journey to buy a ticket
7) Ascend 82 steps
8) Walk half the lenght of Blackfriard Bridge
That isn't a five minute task list.
I use Blackfriars every day. In order to buy a ticket there the OP would have had to:
1) Walk half the lenght of Blackfriard Bridge
2) Descend 82 steps
3) Explain to the gateline staff that he was breaking his journey to buy a ticket
4) Go to the ticket office and join the queue
5) Buy a ticket
6) Explain to the gateline staff that he had broken his journey to buy a ticket
7) Ascend 82 steps
8) Walk half the lenght of Blackfriard Bridge
That isn't a five minute task list.
No. But the records appear to show 20 minutes between the trains they said they arrived and left on.