• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

MK3 classifications

Status
Not open for further replies.

alexl92

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2014
Messages
2,370
I think this is typical rookie question so please accept my apologies but I noticed on an EMT HST in Leeds the other evening that coach G (I think) stated on the data panel that that coach was a MK3 TS-D. It looked like a pretty standard TSO to me, so please could someone explain to me what the 'D' bit stands for?

I know that in DMSL or DBSO for example, it would mean 'driving' or similar but this coach (clearly) doesn't have a cab!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,775
I may be wrong, but possibly D(isabled)- it'll have wheelchair space and an accessible toilet.
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,053
Location
Bristol
I may be wrong, but possibly D(isabled)- it'll have wheelchair space and an accessible toilet.

Correct - Mk4s have one per rake as well.

(and also a first class one )
 
Last edited:

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,498
Location
Norwich
Technically, why is it TS-D rather than a TSOD? Our disabled carriage is a FOD rather than an F-D.
 

scotraildriver

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2009
Messages
1,848
Some units have more or less info on their classifications. Our 170's for example have a D-M-O-C-L-W Driving Motor Open Composite Lavatory Wheelchair. By contrast our 158 are sinply DMS Driving Motor standard. No reference to the open or wheelchair. Who knows why.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Technically, why is it TS-D rather than a TSOD? Our disabled carriage is a FOD rather than an F-D.

Because HST trailers dont have the 'O' on the classification, so its just TF, TS, TSD etc, and no I havent a clue why not either.
 
Last edited:

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,247
Because HST trailers dont have the 'O' on the classification, so its just TF, TS, TSD etc, and no I havent a clue why not either.

Possibly because there were no compartmented HST trailers? So no need to distinguish SKs from SOs, or whatever?
 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,275
Possibly because there were no compartmented HST trailers? So no need to distinguish SKs from SOs, or whatever?

IIRC the only compartmented Mk3s were the DBF on the class 442.

EDIT: There were some on the international rake as well, but I think they only ran in revenue service in Eire.
 

Jonfun

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2007
Messages
1,254
Location
North West
I always assumed it was a distinction between locomotive hauled and unit stock, in that Mk1/2/3a/4 hauled stock was classified as (for example) Tourist Standard Open, First Open etc - if TheEdge is referring to GA's hauled rakes, this would tally. Whereas vehicles which are part of multiple units such as HSTs drop the "tourist" and "open", gain either "motor" or "trailer" so simply become Trailer Standard, Trailer First etc.
 

ge-gn

Member
Joined
5 Dec 2014
Messages
281
On the subject of mk3 data panels, I noticed the other day when I travelled on to Norwich from London that the data panel on my coach said 110mph rather than 125mph. I thought all mk3 stock was 125 passed. Has there been modifications? I'm a new poster, so please excuse if this has been asked before...
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Loco hauled mark3s have always been 110mph max.
They could probably be altered to run at 125mph quite easily if there was the need.
 

ge-gn

Member
Joined
5 Dec 2014
Messages
281
Loco hauled mark3s have always been 110mph max.
They could probably be altered to run at 125mph quite easily if there was the need.

What is different to the loco hauled stock compared to the HST stock?
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Not much, its more a question of the braking, HSTs apply the brakes at both ends so the brakes apply much quicker.
I think the 90s and DVTs do the same but the 90s are max 110mph anyway so no point upping the max speed of the coaches.
Of course having them at 110mph max will also reduce maintenance costs compared to running them at 125mph.
 

ge-gn

Member
Joined
5 Dec 2014
Messages
281
Of course having them at 110mph max will also reduce maintenance costs compared to running them at 125mph.[/QUOTE]

Ah, now that makes sense.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,784
Location
Nottingham
What is different to the loco hauled stock compared to the HST stock?

The main differences in the actual coaches are that the loco-hauled have the standard electric train supply but the HST versions have a non-standard supply so can only get their power from HST power cars. Plus the HST ones don't have buffers. Neither of which affects the maximum speed.
 

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,227
Location
Stockport
IIRC the only compartmented Mk3s were the DBF on the class 442.

EDIT: There were some on the international rake as well, but I think they only ran in revenue service in Eire.

I can't remember the year, but actually saw it in service at Stockport on a Piccadilly - Euston service.

Just looked on Traintesting and it mentions they were put on a Euston - Manchester diagram sometime in the late 1980s, so it must have been around that period when I saw it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top