• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Suggested extensions of London Zones

Status
Not open for further replies.

adrock1976

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2013
Messages
4,450
Location
What's it called? It's called Cumbernauld
There are some oddities with the Zones 1-6 map in that some parts of Zone 6 extend outwith the present day Greater London area that was created back in 1965. For example, Epping in Essex, Elstree & Borehamwood in Hertfordshire, Chessington South, the 2 Ewell stations, Epsom Downs, Tattenham Corner, and Caterham all in Surrey are part of Zone 6, where other logical stations especially dead end branch lines and where routes converge are not.

In light of the current London Crossrail (yes, there are a few around the UK, such as Edinburgh Crossrail that presently runs Newcraighall - Fife stations, and plans for Glasgow Crossrail and Aberdeen Crossrail still waiting to get off the ground) plans to run out west to Reading, and some Anglia local all stations services to transfer to London Overground, I have thought of some suggestions how to revise the outer zones. I will start from the order of the Great Britain Passenger Rail Timetable.

Make Ockendon, Chafford Hundred, Grays, and Purfleet part of Zone 6. This route connects both routes of the LTS Railway (via Upminster and via Rainham), and seems crazy to have the aforementioned stations part of Oyster with no particular zone assigned to it, with one day travelcards not accepted at those stations. It would also provide an alternative route to/from both Upminster and Rainham (from London) if one of the LTS routes are closed or are experiencing disruption.

For the Great Eastern Railway, make Brentwood, Shenfield, and all of the CM postcode area Zone 7. Again, Brentwood and Shenfield have the same problem as Ockendon etc regarding Oyster and one day travelcards.

Re-zone Theobalds Grove, Waltham Cross, and Cheshunt to Zone 6. Both the Seven Sisters and Tottenham Hale routes converge at Cheshunt. This would make the whole of the EN postcode area within Zones 5 and 6 and would be consistent with places such as Cockfosters and Barnet. Furthermore, the stations north of Cheshunt to Hertford East to be in Zone 7.

On the Great Northern Railway, stations north of Crews Hill and Hadley Wood as far as Stevenage to be in Zone 7. This would make most if not all of the SG postcode area in Zone 7.

Midland Railway stations north of Elstree & Borehamwood to St Albans City to be in Zone 7. This would be consistent with the neighbouring Great Northern Railway in that most if not all of the AL postcode area will be in Zone 7.

L&NWR stations Bushey, and the Watford stations to be re-zoned to Zone 7. This would get rid of the crazy situation as per Ockendon and Shenfield, and makes sense as the Metropolitan Railway (London Underground) will be diverted from Cassiobury Park to Junction. Additionally, Kings Langley, and stations to St Albans Abbey also to be in Zone 7. This would make the WD and AL postcode areas part of the zonal fare system.

Both Denham stations on the Great Central Railway to be part of Zone 6. Although a civil parish in Buckinghamshire, it is assigned an Uxbridge postcode (part of historic Middlesex until 1965). This would place the whole of the UB postcode area in Zone 6.

Great Western Railway stations from Iver to Reading, and onwards to Goring & Streatley to be part of Zone 7, together with the branch lines to Windsor & Eton Central, Marlow, and Henley-on-Thames. Also, the route from Reading to Basingstoke to be in Zone 7 too. This would make the whole of the SL and most of the RG postcode areas part of the zonal fare system. Heathrow Airport mainline services to be part of Zone 6, making it consistent with the underground.

Where do we start with the London & South Western Railway? These routes in relation to the zones appear to have been drawn up on a map with a circle drawn around a roll of sellotape (my perception), cutting off several stations that should ideally be in Zone 6. For example, I would make all stations beyond Feltham to Sunnymeads part of Zone 6, with Egham station, and the whole of the Shepperton branch (a dead end branch that extends outside the zones, unlike nearby Chessington South, Tattenham Corner and Caterham) to be in Zone 6 too. This would put the whole of the TW postcode area into the zonal fare system, as a very large part of TW was historically in Middlesex.

Other Zone 6 stations are to be Virginia Water to Weybridge and West Byfleet, Weybridge to Surbiton, Surbiton to Clandon via Cobham, Effingham Junction to both Ewell Stations (this would finally place Epsom in Zone 6, which has the present crazy situation of being the next stop from both Ewell stations which are Zone 6, but Epsom is not). This would place all of the KT postcode area into Zone 6. Furthermore, Woking and Guildford could be both Zones 6/7 for simplicity.

Datchet, Windsor & Eton Riverside, Virginia Water to Reading, Reading to Gatwick Airport via Guildford, Ascot to Alton, Guildford to Haslemere, Woking to Basingstoke, Guildford to Clandon to be in Zone 7. Together with above mentioned suggestions for GWR and western section of London Crossrail, this would make the whole of SL, RG, and GU postcode areas part of the zonal fares system.

The London, Brighton, & South Coast Railway lines seem far more simpler as it appears a lot more common sense was used for the zonal fares system. For example, despite the dead end branches to Epsom Downs, Tattenham Corner, and Caterham being outwith the Greater London area, they are in Zone 6. The only changes I would suggest here are to extend Zone 6 from Ewell to Leatherhead, Coulsdon South to Redhill, and Upper Warlingham to Oxted. Leatherhead to Horsham and across to Gatwick Airport and to Redhill, Redhill to Tonbridge, and Hurst Green to East Grinstead and Uckfield (dead end branches) to be placed in Zone 7. Leatherhead and Redhill stations can be both Zones 6/7 stations. This would place the RH postcode area in Zone 7, with parts of TN as well.

The London, Chatham, & Dover Railway and the South Eastern Railway is similar in regards to how the zonal fares was set up. Again, the only things I would suggest here (in addition to making Oyster PAYG and one day travelcards accepted at the normal Zone 3 rates at Stratford International) are to extend Zone 6 from St Mary Cray and Knockholt to Sevenoaks as that is where both the LC&DR and SER routes converge. Sevenoaks to Tonbridge and Swanley to Chatham or Gillingham (Kent) to be in Zone 7, with Sevenoaks and Swanley stations belonging to both Zones 6/7. Furthermore, Zone 6 to be extended from Barnehurst/Crayford/Slade Green to Dartford, as this is where these routes converge. Also Dartford to LC&DR stations to be in Zone 7, with Dartford station being in Zones 6/7.

Apologies for the long post. Do my suggestions seem good, or am I using a sledgehammer to crack a nut? Are there any better suggestions?

Cheers

Adam
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,305
How would you pay for the massive loss of revenue this would cause? A weekly travelcard from Reading is 124.20, a Zone 1-7 weekly travelcard is just 62.20.

There are a few stations close to London that could be included in the zones, but going out to places like Reading, Uckfield and Chelmsford would be completely impractical.
 

Alfie1014

Established Member
Joined
27 Jun 2012
Messages
1,205
Location
Essex
Less of a sledgehammer, more of a wrecking ball! The simple economics are about supply and demand, creating a zone that would stretch from around 15 miles out from Central London to approx 40 would result in either massive revenue loss for the TOCs or a substantial increase in fares at the inner end of the proposed zone 7; e.g an anytime single from Iver going up from around £7.00 to £21.00!

Reducing fares would stimulate passenger demand enormously, which in turn would require massive funding in even more capacity and increasing fares at the margin would have a significant impact on the areas impacted probably resulting in major rail-heading into zone 6.

In addition residents in the London Boroughs part fund the cost of travel in the GLA area through their Council Tax, those outside London do not, except through general taxation.

Simples!
 

telstarbox

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
6,379
Location
Wennington Crossovers
TfL tried and failed to get Oyster acceptance as far as Sevenoaks. In short, extending the Zones far beyond the Greater London boundary isn't happening.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,291
Postcodes don't generally map onto local authority boundaries anyway, so they are a fundamentally flawed way of defining your areas. Others have mentioned that the zones are basically a Greater London thing, there is some (huge?) resistance in the adjacent counties to becoming part of 'London'.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,780
Greater London is vaguely oval in shape so people along the GEML in particular benefit from lower fares than people an equivalent distance to the north.

I would like to see zones 7 to 9 applying all round London. To the east Harold Wood could justifiably be in 7 rather than 6 and then Brentwood in 8 and Shenfield in 9

To the west Beconsfield should be in 9.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,751
The SG postcode are stretches as far north as Sandy, so even if Stevenage was in Zone 7 (which is ludicrous), most of the SG postcode area would still be outside.
 

DelayRepay

Established Member
Joined
21 May 2011
Messages
2,929
Midland Railway stations north of Elstree & Borehamwood to St Albans City to be in Zone 7. This would be consistent with the neighbouring Great Northern Railway in that most if not all of the AL postcode area will be in Zone 7.

I would love this as it would reduce the price of a weekly travelcard from St Albans from £100 to £60 (approx). I suspect Thameslink would be less keen given the loss in revenue.

This is the problem - how is the railway and TFL going to make up the huge shortfall in revenue this will create? They would have to increase fares across the zones to compensate which would mean people in the current zone 6 would not be happy.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,607
Location
Isle of Man
So you would have Uckfield, a mere 46 miles from London, in the same zone (zone 7) as Watford?

Makes perfect sense!
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,735
Location
Yorkshire
Given the fight LM had to get Watford into a more expensive Zone I anticipate opposition if you propose to pop it into Zone 7, never mind the other fares which would reduce considerably.
 

adrock1976

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2013
Messages
4,450
Location
What's it called? It's called Cumbernauld
Having thought things through a bit more, I understand that concentric zones can have disadvantages in how they are worked out. For example, how are they measured, and at what point do you stop?

In my opening post, I recognise that I did not pay attention to Zones 8 and 9, and focused on 6 and 7 combined with postcode areas. I have realised it does have its own problems in that aspect, and I realised that I should have been more clearer in the opening post that my original suggestions were not to be implemented all at the same time, but maybe on a gradual basis such as when [London] Crossrail is up and running, together with the transfer of local West Anglia services to London Overground. Also, I believe Oyster is being introduced in the future at Gatwick Airport, complicating matters further as to what zone is ideal for it to be in.

I recognise that with the present Zone 6 boundary there are some minor anomalies, such as the Chessington South branch is wholly in Zone 6, but stations beyond Hampton on the Shepperton branch are not. Chessington has always been part of Surrey, where Shepperton was historically in Middlesex. Same as Staines.

Regarding Oyster at Reading when [London] Crossrail is up and running, I did take into account of some possible problems that may arise. For example, Reading to London via the 2 Windsor & Eton stations is a recognised alternative route, in addition to via Bracknell. Should those routes be included in Oyster or the fare zones too, or an additional supplement payable?

My view is that the boundary of Zone 6 where necessary should extend to the first junction station outwith Greater London where routes converge or diverge i.e the obvious ones being Epsom and Dartford.

Perhaps more thoughts should be made regarding the possibility of extending Zones 7 to 9 to other places outwith Greater London, as that presently covers Buckinghamshire and Hertfordshire at this moment in time?

Alternatively, do we start again from scratch by having the zones extending to a certain radius from a central point in London, such as on a point where the WC and EC postcodes (truly Central London) meet, and measure each of the zones from there, with one or two minor adjustments where necessary to fit junction stations such as Epsom and Dartford in, and the Shepperton branch?

Hope I've cleared up the intentions behind my opening post.

In peace

Adam
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,453
Simple answer. Only have the zone Oyster system for everywhere within Greater London. If it's outside then do not add it and if it has already been added remove it.

I mean there is a 465 bus from Dorking to Kingston that is classed as part of London for Oyster. Where as the bus from Guildford to Kingston isn't.

So Londoners are subsidising people's travel from Dorking to Kingston, which is £1.45 for the whole journey if you do it. What is the revenue shortfall by doing this? The journey time I believe is at least an hour.

This change would mean Gatwick wouldn't become part of the zonal system but why should Londoners pay when it's outside?
 

hassaanhc

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
2,225
Location
Southall
Simple answer. Only have the zone Oyster system for everywhere within Greater London. If it's outside then do not add it and if it has already been added remove it.

I mean there is a 465 bus from Dorking to Kingston that is classed as part of London for Oyster. Where as the bus from Guildford to Kingston isn't.

So Londoners are subsidising people's travel from Dorking to Kingston, which is £1.45 for the whole journey if you do it. What is the revenue shortfall by doing this? The journey time I believe is at least an hour.

This change would mean Gatwick wouldn't become part of the zonal system but why should Londoners pay when it's outside?

TfL bus services that cross the boundary do get some funding from the relevant local authorities for their operation. Surrey CC don't seem to want to fund too much though, look at the overcrowding on the 117, 216 and 235. If they were in London then the 117 and 216 would have been increased from 3bph ages ago (235 runs every 8 minutes but desperately needs double deckers).

Quote from the Surrey County Council website:
In the northern part of Surrey, there are several cross-boundary services running from/to parts of Greater London which are provided by London Buses on behalf of Transport for London. We are not responsible for the operation of these but we do contribute significantly to the cost of running some of them.
http://new.surreycc.gov.uk/roads-an...,-tenders,-statistics-and-general-information
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,191
Location
London
Why not a Dutch style national zoning system whereby the whole country is divided in to zones?
 

Feathers44

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
378
Epsom is expected to be included in the zones within the next few months.

The local Guardian reported it as next September at the earliest I think. Have they moved the date up? Even then there's still a debate over what zone it will be in with the pessimists expecting zone 7.

I think if we were to go as far as this proposal then the number of zones would probably have to enter double figures.
 
Last edited:

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,578
Location
Crayford
The local Guardian reported it as next September at the earliest I think. Have they moved the date up? Even then there's still a debate over what zone it will be in with the pessimists expecting zone 7.

I think if we were to go as far as this proposal then the number of zones would probably have to enter double figures.

Epsom will be at least zone 7, possibly even 8 or a zone on it's own. Also note that the Greater London Boundary has always extended down around Chessington so that isn't actually an anomaly. Other dead end branches were incorporated, probably with local authority support, in an effort to boost useage.
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,465
Why not a Dutch style national zoning system whereby the whole country is divided in to zones?

Fares clustering is like zoning, only on a much finer scale, so we are already doing it somewhat.

I am not convinced that zonal fares on a national scale will work, but I am willing to be proved wrong if a workable system is found. Would you be having one big group of concentric circles nationwide or each area with its own local concentric circles? What happens when they start overlapping? Or would you have "blotches" which is like fares clustering as I mentioned above?

Individual urban areas, on the contrary, are perfect candidates for zonal fares, if ever one day we have proper intergration. Again overlapping zones can present issues, but they can be kept apart if only done locally.
 

Feathers44

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
378
Epsom will be at least zone 7, possibly even 8 or a zone on it's own. Also note that the Greater London Boundary has always extended down around Chessington so that isn't actually an anomaly. Other dead end branches were incorporated, probably with local authority support, in an effort to boost useage.

As long as the oyster price is cheaper on on par with paper, I don't really mind. Convenience counts for something here. That's probably true across the board with this idea since I doubt 'everything' can be constrained by the existing zonal system that far out of the centre. I like the 'clustering' idea since it seems more practical than ever larger (but thinner?) concentric circles.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,453
TfL bus services that cross the boundary do get some funding from the relevant local authorities for their operation. Surrey CC don't seem to want to fund too much though, look at the overcrowding on the 117, 216 and 235. If they were in London then the 117 and 216 would have been increased from 3bph ages ago (235 runs every 8 minutes but desperately needs double deckers).

Quote from the Surrey County Council website:

http://new.surreycc.gov.uk/roads-an...,-tenders,-statistics-and-general-information
Looks like I was wrong then. Would they have to subsidise it far more given the cost for a journey from Dorking to Kingston is only £1.45. There's no way you get a journey from Guildford to Dorking by bus for that price or even Guildford to Woking.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,735
Location
Yorkshire
TfL bus services that cross the boundary do get some funding from the relevant local authorities for their operation. Surrey CC don't seem to want to fund too much though, look at the overcrowding on the 117, 216 and 235. If they were in London then the 117 and 216 would have been increased from 3bph ages ago (235 runs every 8 minutes but desperately needs double deckers).

Quote from the Surrey County Council website:

http://new.surreycc.gov.uk/roads-an...,-tenders,-statistics-and-general-information

That's a fairly ambiguous quote - I'm not sure if they provide direct funding or they're talking about how much the ENTCS payments cost them...
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,847
Location
Epsom
The local Guardian reported it as next September at the earliest I think. Have they moved the date up? Even then there's still a debate over what zone it will be in with the pessimists expecting zone 7.

The negotiations over which specific zone are, I understand, still ongoing.

In principle it is almost certain that Epsom will be zoned; as you say there is still a question mark over the question of zone 6 or not. The sticking point is the Treasury is not keen on zone 6 because it effectively means a fares reduction for Epsom which would need to be covered centrally - they are not taking into account that there would very likely be a lot of additional journeys to and from Epsom that would probably cancel out the effects and thus leave the subsidy profile unaffected overall...
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,295
Location
Bolton
...they are not taking into account that there would very likely be a lot of additional journeys to and from Epsom that would probably cancel out the effects and thus leave the subsidy profile unaffected overall...

When do they *ever* take that into account? Never!
 

londonbridge

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2010
Messages
1,889
On a similar note, but a case of re-zoning, Steve Reed, Labour MP for Croydon North, has launched a campaign to have East and West Croydon reallocated to zone 4, arguing that stations such as Hounslow Central and Chigwell are further from Trafalgar Square than Chigwell, yet are in zone 4, thus Croydon commuters are being ripped off by paying more to travel shorter distances.
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,824
Location
Back office
That's a fairly ambiguous quote - I'm not sure if they provide direct funding or they're talking about how much the ENTCS payments cost them...

In the case of the 465, I'm not convinced TfL would run a 3 bph service so far out of the GLA boundary without external contributions. I suspect Surrey CC do provide direct funding, else it'd probably be a 1 bph service, similar to the 166.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,735
Location
Yorkshire
In the case of the 465, I'm not convinced TfL would run a 3 bph service so far out of the GLA boundary without external contributions. I suspect Surrey CC do provide direct funding, else it'd probably be a 1 bph service, similar to the 166.

It appears that SCC do provide funding, though it's only 2bph apart from 1 hour in the morning peak
 

bussnapperwm

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2014
Messages
1,527
Surely can't the Zones be organised thus

Zone 1 - 0-0.99 miles from trafalgar square
Zone 2 - 1-3.99 miles from Trafalgar
Zone 3 - 4-8.99 miles
Zone 4 - 9-13.99 miles
Zone 5 - 14-18.99 miles
Zone 6 - 19-24.99 miles

Each station measured as the crow flies
 

hassaanhc

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
2,225
Location
Southall
On a similar note, but a case of re-zoning, Steve Reed, Labour MP for Croydon North, has launched a campaign to have East and West Croydon reallocated to zone 4, arguing that stations such as Hounslow Central and Chigwell are further from Trafalgar Square than Chigwell, yet are in zone 4, thus Croydon commuters are being ripped off by paying more to travel shorter distances.

Talking about Chigwell, it was in Zone 5 but in January 2007 it was moved into Zone 4 to try and improve usage (that station, along with Roding Valley, Grange Hill, Hainault, Fairlop and Barkingside moved at the same time and are very quiet stations. In fact Roding Valley actually is the quietest in London, measured by entry and exit).
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,305
A few years ago I did a zone structure based purely on distance from Charing Cross. The number of stations in each zone was kept constant so for each station that moved in, one had to move out.

STATIONS MOVING IN
Zone 2 to Zone 1
Battersea Park, Camden Road, Camden Town, Kennington, Mornington Crescent, Oval, Queenstown Road (Battersea)
Zone 3 to Zone 2
Balham, Cricklewood, Crouch Hill, Hampstead Heath, Harringay, Harringay
Green Lanes, Highgate, Stamford Hill, Streatham Hill, Tooting Bec, Tulse
Hill, Wandsworth Common, West Dulwich
Zone 4 to Zone 3
Anerley, Arnos Grove, Beckenham Hill, Finchley Central, Kent House, Lower
Sydenham, New Beckenham, New Southgate, Penge East, Penge West, Wembley Park, Wembley Stadium, West Finchley
Zone 5 to Zone 4
Berrylands, Bromley South, Bush Hill Park, Canons Park, Carshalton,
Cockfosters, East Croydon, Eden Park, Edgware, Grange Park, New Barnet,
Norbiton, Oakwood, Twickenham, Waddon, West Croydon
Zone 6 to Zone 4
Kingston
Zone 6 to Zone 5
Fulwell, Hadley Wood, Hampton Court, Hampton Wick, Purley, Purley Oaks,
Sanderstead, Surbiton, Teddington, Turkey Street
Outside Zones to Zone 6
Bushey, Carpenders Park, Cheshunt, Claygate, Cuffley, Epsom, Esher, Hersham, Hinchley Wood, Kempton Park, Potters Bar, Sunbury, Theobalds Grove, Upper Halliford, Waltham Cross

STATIONS MOVING OUT
Zone 1 to Zone 2
Aldgate East, Bayswater, Earl's Court, Gloucester Road, High Street
Kensington, Notting Hill Gate, Queensway
Zone 2 to Zone 3
Acton Central, Blackwall, Cutty Sark, East India, Elverson Road, Greenwich,
Island Gardens, Lewisham, North Acton, North Greenwich, Pudding Mill Lane,
St Johns, Turnham Green
Zone 3 to Zone 4
Beckton, Beckton Park, Cyprus, East Ham, Gallions Reach, King George V,
Manor Park, Northfields, South Ealing, West Ealing, Wimbledon Chase,
Woodgrange Park, Woolwich Dockyard
Zone 4 to Zone 5
Abbey Wood, Barkingside, Chigwell, Fairlop, Goodmayes, Grange Hill,
Hainault, Hounslow Central, Hounslow East, Malden Manor, Newbury Park,
Roding Valley, Seven Kings, Southall, Upney, Welling, Worcester Park
Zone 5 to Zone 6
Albany Park, Belvedere, Dagenham East, Dagenham Heathway, Eastcote, Hatton Cross, Hayes & Harlington, Petts Wood, Pinner, Ruislip Gardens, South Ruislip
Zone 6 to Outside Zones
Caterham, Emerson Park, Epping, Gidea Park, Harold Wood, Hornchurch,
Kingswood, Knockholt, Moor Park, Tadworth, Theydon Bois, Upminster,
Upminster Bridge, Uxbridge, West Drayton
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,735
Location
Yorkshire
Surely can't the Zones be organised thus

Zone 1 - 0-0.99 miles from trafalgar square
Zone 2 - 1-3.99 miles from Trafalgar
Zone 3 - 4-8.99 miles
Zone 4 - 9-13.99 miles
Zone 5 - 14-18.99 miles
Zone 6 - 19-24.99 miles

Each station measured as the crow flies

Why is this an improvement?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top