DaveNewcastle
Established Member
I'm grateful to Private Eye for bringing this story to my attention, and hope that the publication doesn"t mind me repeating some of its comments here.
York City Council implemented a "bus lane" on Lendal Bridge in the city centre. The implementation was successfully challenged, and a few months ago, a Tribunal found against the City, determining that the signage on the scheme was "ambiguous, inadequate and confusing", and I understand, other defects with the scheme. As a consequence, the City agreed to refund around 50,000 motorists who had been fined after having been detected diving cars in the 'bus lane'.
The Council agreed to refund motorists who had paid the fine.
But now, at a recent Council meeting, the Scrutiny Committee determined that only those motorists who apply for a refund will receive it.
York City Council implemented a "bus lane" on Lendal Bridge in the city centre. The implementation was successfully challenged, and a few months ago, a Tribunal found against the City, determining that the signage on the scheme was "ambiguous, inadequate and confusing", and I understand, other defects with the scheme. As a consequence, the City agreed to refund around 50,000 motorists who had been fined after having been detected diving cars in the 'bus lane'.
The Council agreed to refund motorists who had paid the fine.
But now, at a recent Council meeting, the Scrutiny Committee determined that only those motorists who apply for a refund will receive it.