• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

BTP finally make arrests over silly pensioners protest in SY

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,064
Location
Reston City Centre
No doubt if it were two young lawbreakers protesting about paying for the previous generations' debt, "a few good knocks with a baton is what they need". ;)

I jest, of course. I'm sure you're absolutely lovely and in no way advocate police brutality based on a select demographic. :D

It's a fair point - if groups of teenagers or twenty-somethings went on weekly "Freedom Rides" (boarding trains without a ticket, refusing to pay, singing Civil Rights songs, acting like the rules don't apply to them, haranguing any officials e.g. those who don't let them board the train without a ticket) then we'd be seeing complaints about it ("young people these days have no respect" / "a spell of National Service would do them good" / "it's Broken Britain" / "I blame lack of discipline in schools" etc)...

...but when pensioners do it, they get a free ride (both metaphorically and literally), with Northern declaring "free" days, since they were too scared of the negative headlines of standing up to these hoodlums.

However, as the other "South Yorkshire OAP" thread shows, the minute you try to point out that this free train travel (inc to Leeds and other stations in West Yorkshire) is a luxury that local taxpayers cannot afford any more, you get the bleeding heart "oh, so you'd take away our bus passes too, would you" stuff from those who've had free travel for so long that they have no concept of its value/ cost.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,146
Location
Redcar
Do we know which offence the man in the video allegedly committed?

One of the two listed of course. At a guess, obstruction.

My issue is that we don't see what happened before the footage, as usual, resulting in the claims of 'brutality'.
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
I was once told by a wise old woman, a nasty old person was once a nasty young person, age has nothing to do with it!
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,495
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
However, as the other "South Yorkshire OAP" thread shows, the minute you try to point out that this free train travel (inc to Leeds and other stations in West Yorkshire) is a luxury that local taxpayers cannot afford any more, you get the bleeding heart "oh, so you'd take away our bus passes too, would you" stuff from those who've had free travel for so long that they have no concept of its value/ cost.

Since you raise the matter, exactly how long has this free travel to which you allude been given to the class of humanity to which you refer and what was the date of inception, since you feel that you need to inform the forum membership of this matter of time.

I am, at the age of 69, acutely aware that my memory recall is not what it was when I was aged 29, but it is still longer than the so-called memory span of a goldfish. Do not forget that I was afflicted by a full stroke in July 2010 and a mini-stroke some eight months ago which could have, but fortunately did not, have severe implications for my cognitive thinking ability. I still have enough mental facility to be aware of the various items such as make up the cost of living, income tax, community charge ("H" banded property), water rates, gas and electricity charges....do I need to continue. Old indeed we may be, but many of us are still enjoying the full use of our mental faculties.
 

DownSouth

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2011
Messages
1,545
Since you raise the matter, exactly how long has this free travel to which you allude been given to the class of humanity to which you refer and what was the date of inception…
Does it really matter?

After all, this…
Old indeed we may be, but many of us are still enjoying the full use of our mental faculties.
…does include the full use of selective memory when convenient.

As I write this, I'm reading a couple of complaints from football fans here in Adelaide complaining about having a levy added to the cost of tickets from next year to pay more of the cost of the free public transport they get to/from matches despite only having had the free transport for just over half a season now!
 

G0ORC

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
227
Since you raise the matter, exactly how long has this free travel to which you allude been given to the class of humanity to which you refer and what was the date of inception, since you feel that you need to inform the forum membership of this matter of time.

I am, at the age of 69, acutely aware that my memory recall is not what it was when I was aged 29, but it is still longer than the so-called memory span of a goldfish. Do not forget that I was afflicted by a full stroke in July 2010 and a mini-stroke some eight months ago which could have, but fortunately did not, have severe implications for my cognitive thinking ability. I still have enough mental facility to be aware of the various items such as make up the cost of living, income tax, community charge ("H" banded property), water rates, gas and electricity charges....do I need to continue. Old indeed we may be, but many of us are still enjoying the full use of our mental faculties.

Hear, hear....

The vast majority of this thread is driven by the envy of those who haven't paid into the system for very long against those, like me, who have paid into it for a long time (47 years in my case - and I'm still paying, via double taxation of my pension) without taking anything out of it.

Free travel (bus, in my case) is just small recompense for the vast amount we have paid in. Save your venom for those who have paid nothing in and are taking vast amounts out. You know who I am referring to.

I suspect that if a 16-25 free pass was suddenly introduced - to encourage the use of public transport perhaps, and a 26 - 55 free pass for the sake of equality then this thread may not exist at all.

It all comes to those who wait!
 
Last edited:

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
hear, hear....

The vast majority of this thread is driven by envy of those who haven't paid into the system for, in my example for 47 years without taking anything out of it and for once are getting something out of it.

I suspect that if a 16-25 free pass was suddenly introduced - to encourage the use of public transport perhaps, and a 26 - 55 free pass for the sake of equality then this thread may not exist at all.

It all comes to those who wait!
That just isn't true. The system in unsustainable and will need to change; a negative change between now and when/if I reach retirement is inevitable.

There will be less free travel in the future, not more.
 

G0ORC

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
227
That just isn't true. The system in unsustainable and will need to change; a negative change between now and when/if I reach retirement is inevitable.

There will be less free travel in the future, not more.

I don't disagree with that, but its not just about free travel, is it?

The whole "welfare state" system is unsustainable - for instance, why are people who haven't paid into the system at all are, when they arrive in then UK, suddenly allowed benefits which I, and many like me have paid for?

We have paid into a system (in my case for 47 years and still paying) that allegedly would financially help us after retirement. All I get out of it (since I'm not yet of pensionable age) is my free travel - NOTHING ELSE.

Small recompense as far as I'm concerned.

PS - Sorry I forgot about my free library ticket, (courtesy of Derbyshire County Council) since I now have plenty of time on my hands to read. Big deal!

Of course, there are free prescriptions available for those who need them - why don't they take those away too? Or is that too politically damaging for government to undertake? The watershed will be at the start of the next government when all of the unpopular legislation will be pushed through. They dare not do anything now, it would lose too many votes.
 
Last edited:

DownSouth

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2011
Messages
1,545
We have paid into a system (in my case for 47 years and still paying) that allegedly would financially help us after retirement. All I get out of it (since I'm not yet of pensionable age) is my free travel - NOTHING ELSE.

Small recompense as far as I'm concerned.
You got conned. Today's benefits are paid for by today's taxes, what you "paid into the system" has already been spent.

Facts are facts - as the population ages the burden gets wider while the tax base is simultaneously getting smaller, and eventually something has to give. Today's young workers are already doing their share of the heavy lifting by facing a lifetime of renting where previous generations were able to buy their own homes, at some point they will need to be joined in doing it tough by the growing aged population.

There is a case, in my opinion, for moving to something more sustainable than "one man, one vote" which would ideally look like separate quotas in national legislatures to be elected by the youth, the working age people and the elderly. Continuing to allow a disproportionately large amount of power to the elderly is only going to delay moving to a more sustainable model.
 

G0ORC

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
227
You got conned. Today's benefits are paid for by today's taxes, what you "paid into the system" has already been spent.

... and I'm still paying, like many, many others. Having already paid tax on my income from where my pension savings originated, I now pay tax on my pension as well since its classed as "unearned income"

Double taxation - fair or what?
 
Last edited:

Class377

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
444
I don't disagree with that, but its not just about free travel, is it?

The whole "welfare state" system is unsustainable - for instance, why are people who haven't paid into the system at all are, when they arrive in then UK, suddenly allowed benefits which I, and many like me have paid for?

We have paid into a system (in my case for 47 years and still paying) that allegedly would financially help us after retirement. All I get out of it (since I'm not yet of pensionable age) is my free travel - NOTHING ELSE.

Small recompense as far as I'm concerned.

PS - Sorry I forgot about my free library ticket, (courtesy of Derbyshire County Council) since I now have plenty of time on my hands to read. Big deal!

Of course, there are free prescriptions available for those who need them - why don't they take those away too? Or is that too politically damaging for government to undertake? The watershed will be at the start of the next government when all of the unpopular legislation will be pushed through. They dare not do anything now, it would lose too many votes.

I've already said I'm not getting involved in the debate on whether the pass is good or bad, but surely you can understand that, even if you feel you've been wronged, you can't break the law and cause problems for the police because of it? What's wrong with doing something legal?
 

34D

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2011
Messages
6,049
Location
Yorkshire
Since you raise the matter, exactly how long has this free travel to which you allude been given to the class of humanity to which you refer and what was the date of inception, since you feel that you need to inform the forum membership of this matter of time.

Paul, as you will doubtless know, the ENCTS scheme commenced on 1st April 2008. Prior to that, certain areas (and SY was one) allowed pensioners heavily discounted travel.

Regarding the events of yesterday, do we know whether Northern RPI's took names and addresses of all ticketless travellers?
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,669
Location
Isle of Man
The whole "welfare state" system is unsustainable - for instance, why are people who haven't paid into the system at all are, when they arrive in then UK, suddenly allowed benefits which I, and many like me have paid for?

They're not, but don't pesky facts trouble your rant.

As for the original topic, wonder if Northern will be sending them an £80 penalty charge? ;)
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
They're not, but don't pesky facts trouble your rant.

As for the original topic, wonder if Northern will be sending them an £80 penalty charge? ;)

I'm sure they will all prefer to have their day in court...
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,595
Location
Yorkshire
... and I'm still paying, like many, many others. Having already paid tax on my income from where my pension savings originated, I now pay tax on my pension as well since its classed as "unearned income"

Double taxation - fair or what?
People of older generations got free education and may have only worked between, say, 21-60 and yet expect to live until about 90 with a substantial pension, paid for by mostly future generations. That's not sustainable. If you look at how much you've put in, I suspect it doesn't actually pay for a substantial pension of around 30 years at all!

You admit that it's unsustainable, but are you one of the ones who wants future generations to pay to sustain benefits for your generation?

In general, the older generation do have more money than younger generation, yet portray the opposite to be true.

Northern have already given loads of free "discretionary" days to this group, which they never would have done if the passengers were young people. They only put up with it for a long time because it was older people and they do get treated with more respect by the rail industry in general than younger people (as has been evidenced numerous times).
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,139
Location
Redcar
The whole "welfare state" system is unsustainable - for instance, why are people who haven't paid into the system at all are, when they arrive in then UK, suddenly allowed benefits which I, and many like me have paid for?

They're not. For one the rule around claiming benefits when you aren't a UK National are increasingly strict. For another they aren't claiming Contribution Based benefits (which are based on National Insurance contributions) they're claiming income based benefits which, as the name implies, are based on income and have no bearing, whatsoever, on what you may or may not have paid into the system. But ignoring that they still have to fulfill rigorous criteria around their immigration status before they can claim anything at all.
 

Barn

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,487
In general, the older generation do have more money than younger generation, yet portray the opposite to be true.

Agree entirely with this. The generation just retiring now (the baby boomers) will probably go down as the luckiest, most wealthy generation for a long time. They have accumulated wealth that the generation below simply will not be able to match, they bought houses at 3x salary rather than 12x salary, they did not have a huge pensioner class to support during their working lives and they have much better pension plans than are now available.

I cannot easily save for my retirement at all because despite earning at the 95th percentile nationwide I barely meet my housing costs (for a shared ownership flat in London) and other fixed expenses.

I am not jealous - good luck to them - but I do think that it is wrong to be applying blanket subsidies to older people simply because of their age. It is particularly galling, as a somewhat struggling 30 year old, to see 60-something year old partners in law firms commute using their Freedom Passes which I subsidise.

The myth that pensioners are poor and the working population rich is just that - a myth.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,064
Location
Reston City Centre
Since you raise the matter, exactly how long has this free travel to which you allude been given to the class of humanity to which you refer and what was the date of inception, since you feel that you need to inform the forum membership of this matter of time.

I am, at the age of 69, acutely aware that my memory recall is not what it was when I was aged 29, but it is still longer than the so-called memory span of a goldfish. Do not forget that I was afflicted by a full stroke in July 2010 and a mini-stroke some eight months ago which could have, but fortunately did not, have severe implications for my cognitive thinking ability. I still have enough mental facility to be aware of the various items such as make up the cost of living, income tax, community charge ("H" banded property), water rates, gas and electricity charges....do I need to continue. Old indeed we may be, but many of us are still enjoying the full use of our mental faculties.

Paul - I'm a bit confused about what you are asking here (other than it was 2008 when the free England-wide bus travel came in, under ENCTS - prior to that there were different schemes in different councils).

Whilst I'm glad to hear that you live in an expensive house and enjoy the use of your mental faculties, I'm struggling to understand what (if anything) you want answered here (?)

The vast majority of this thread is driven by the envy

This thread is driven by the fact that South Yorkshire tax payers cannot afford to pay for South Yorkshire pensioners to have free train travel (in the boundaries plus also to Leeds /Huddersfield etc).

Normally the "you're just envious" argument is one reserved for threads about railstaff pay/ conditions! ;)

I'm still paying, via double taxation of my pension

... and I'm still paying, like many, many others. Having already paid tax on my income from where my pension savings originated, I now pay tax on my pension as well since its classed as "unearned income"

Double taxation - fair or what?

How is your pension double taxed? Pension contributions are made tax free (i.e. before income tax is applied to that part of your salary), you can take up to a quarter of your pension fund out tax free.

The remaining pension is subject to income tax (as is all income).

The difference is that when your pension was invested, your pension scheme got tax relief on the dividends (something that today's workers don't get as it was abolished in the late 1990s).

Free travel (bus, in my case) is just small recompense for the vast amount we have paid in

Apart from the pensions and the winter fuel allowance and the enhanced savings rates and the free bus travel... what have the Romans ever done for pensioners?

Save your venom for those who have paid nothing in and are taking vast amounts out. You know who I am referring to

I don't know who you are referring to. Please enlighten.

why are people who haven't paid into the system at all are, when they arrive in then UK, suddenly allowed benefits which I, and many like me have paid for?

Ah, *that*'s the road you were going down...

...which generous benefits are you talking about then?

I don't disagree with that, but its not just about free travel, is it?

Yes. That's what the protests were about - pensioners in South Yorkshire who think that free train travel is a "right", who sing civil rights songs and who think that they are above the law.

Please stop trying to turn this into an argument about something that it isn't.

We have paid into a system (in my case for 47 years and still paying) that allegedly would financially help us after retirement

There's still financial help after retirement - it's called a state pension. Nobody promised you forty seven years ago that you could have free train travel, did they?

Of course, there are free prescriptions available for those who need them - why don't they take those away too?

Again, nobody is suggesting this. But if you try to debate about pensioner entitlements you always get someone getting hysterical and before you know it the debate about free train travel will become "oh, so now you want to stop my pension".

Wibble.

You got conned. Today's benefits are paid for by today's taxes, what you "paid into the system" has already been spent.

Facts are facts - as the population ages the burden gets wider while the tax base is simultaneously getting smaller, and eventually something has to give. Today's young workers are already doing their share of the heavy lifting by facing a lifetime of renting where previous generations were able to buy their own homes, at some point they will need to be joined in doing it tough by the growing aged population

Agreed.

The Welfare State is a glorified Ponzi Scheme - the current generation of workers pay for the current generation of pensioners - that's how it always has been (since the first generation of pensioners hadn't paid for their own retirement).

Difference is that this current generation of pensioners didn't pay for their parents' generation to have free train travel, which is why its unfair for them to expect free train travel to be paid for them.

People of older generations got free education and may have only worked between, say, 21-60 and yet expect to live until about 90 with a substantial pension, paid for by mostly future generations. That's not sustainable. If you look at how much you've put in, I suspect it doesn't actually pay for a substantial pension of around 30 years at all!

You admit that it's unsustainable, but are you one of the ones who wants future generations to pay to sustain benefits for your generation?

In general, the older generation do have more money than younger generation, yet portray the opposite to be true.

Northern have already given loads of free "discretionary" days to this group, which they never would have done if the passengers were young people. They only put up with it for a long time because it was older people and they do get treated with more respect by the rail industry in general than younger people (as has been evidenced numerous times).

Agreed. The only surprise is that Northern have started playing "bad cop" (after turning a blind eye to this bunch of "freedom riders" for the past three months).

We've seen people in the "Disputes" subforum being prosecuted for a lot less than the price of a ticket from Barnsley to Sheffield.
 

Aldaniti

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Messages
668
I still have a few years to go before reaching pensionable age. Two thoughts, giving pensioners free public transport gives many of them the social mobility that might otherwise result in them leading less active lives. Many pensioners are not short of a bob or two but many struggle. You could make an argument that the concession is limited to buses or rail travel at weekend only, and I might agree but I believe there is a strong social value in providing pensioners with free bus tavel. Second, the wasted police and NHS resources expelled on your average town centre Friday and Saturday night must amount to millions every week. Of course, this is a problem which arises predominately from those under a certain age. However, I'm struggling so see where the social value is.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,241
I am personally heartened by the older generation standing up for themselves because god knows lots of younger folk won't bother until it is too late.

Standing up for yourself is one thing. Helping yourself to somebody else's property is another matter .....
 

brompton rail

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2009
Messages
754
Location
Doncaster
I was once told by a wise old woman, a nasty old person was once a nasty young person, age has nothing to do with it!

Very true - and a point we should keep in mind, whether we are talking about pensioners who believe they are above the law due to their " sense of entitlement" or young people who apparently feel that if others receive something they don't then it 'ain't fair"!

I've paid all my working life for other peoples' children (to be born, to be educated, etc), for other people to be treated when they are ill (hoping I not going to join them), for benefits for other people less fortunate than me; as well as other peoples wars (I was never asked), building motorways (I never use them), and so on and on. In most instances I am happy to do this by paying my taxes - Governments may not always (or hardly ever!) do what I would like. However this is the price of living in a civilised society and I'm happy with that.
 
Last edited:

PermitToTravel

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2011
Messages
3,042
Location
Groningen
Second, the wasted police and NHS resources expelled on your average town centre Friday and Saturday night must amount to millions every week. Of course, this is a problem which arises predominately from those under a certain age. However, I'm struggling so see where the social value is.

The extra police and NHS expenditure from the "night time economy" is largely (if not wholly) met by those partaking, through alcohol duty. It is unfairly subsidised by those who drink and don't cause trouble, but not by every taxpayer in the country.
 

Lockwood

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2013
Messages
1,249
I'm waiting for the post in disputes.
"I was at Sheffield, and I thought I could use my pass, but I couldn't. Then some policemen tried to arrest me for it. I'm 64, and never been in trouble with the law before. What do I do? I'm very worried now."
 

bradders1983

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2010
Messages
692
Location
Sheffield
http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/crime...st-arrests-transport-police-respond-1-6690530

Jen Dunstan, of Sheffield Disabled People Against The Cuts, said: “Dozens of elderly and disabled people have been left with bruising. Some have cuts where their skin has broken from being pushed and shoved.

“A placid and calm gentleman was roughly manhandled. I am angry and shocked. The police are meant to protect elderly people.”

Yorkshire Ambulance Service was called after one protester passed out with breathing difficulties on the platform.

Fran Postlethwaite, aged 62, the wife of another of the campaigners, from Barnsley, said: “My husband was arrested by British Transport Police for absolutely nothing.

“He was completing a peaceful protest and doing nothing at all wrong and he was violently manhandled by police officers.

“We are just peaceful protesters and we are being treated like criminals.

“They pushed a woman over, and an old gentleman nearly fell on the rails when they were pushing.

“They even confiscated my megaphone.”

Why are these pensioners surprised? They were undertaking an illegal protest on private property and a number of them were either going to travel without paying a fare, or had just travelled without paying one.

Zero sympathy.
 

bradders1983

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2010
Messages
692
Location
Sheffield
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-police-protest-cuts-free-travel-passes.html

This is the moment police officers grabbed and handcuffed pensioners during a protest over transport cuts at a train station.

Officers from British Transport Police can be seen forcing down the head of Tony Nuttall, 65, and cuffing his hands together behind his back.

Footage recorded yesterday at Sheffield railway station, show five officers tackling the man, who struggles to stand as he is dragged across the platform.
 

Class377

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
444
http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/crime...st-arrests-transport-police-respond-1-6690530



Why are these pensioners surprised? They were undertaking an illegal protest on private property and a number of them were either going to travel without paying a fare, or had just travelled without paying one.

Zero sympathy.

Quite. If you provoke a policeman then you're going to get manhandled, that's their mandate so that they can maintain order! If cuts from impact are all they're complaining about, they got off lightly surely. What odds these same people were supporting water cannons during tuition fee protests?

If I was to commit a crime I wouldn't complain or use age as a high ground. Surely it's ageism to allow pensioners to break the law?


I particularly like this photo, where he's calling it segregation to not give OAPs free travel. How does he feel about segregating OAPs by making them immune to arrest I wonder? :lol:

Also he is quoted as saying "The police are meant to protect elderly people" - from what exactly? Yes, protect them if they're at risk, but if they're breaking the law it stands to reason they should be arrested...

Personally next time they did this, I'd hit them all with a RoRA prosecution giving them the maximum possible fine and pushing for imprisonment if applicable (I believe RoRA gives the chance for 3 months?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top