• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ugliest EMU/DMU

Status
Not open for further replies.

318259

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2011
Messages
176
Hello,

Time for another 318259 "opinion thread".

What, in your opinion, is the ugliest DMU or EMU ever made? Not in terms of livery, just in terms of shape, window position, things like that?

I can't decide between the ScotRail class 380 and the Gatwick Express class 442.

320px-380004_at_Largs_2011.jpg


320px-442411_Gatwick_Express.JPG
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,350
Location
Yorkshire
I rather like both of those, though the 5-WES does look better if the lockers for the jumper cables are closed (and still exist!)...

A couple of historic nominations here (not my photos)- The 151:
151etches.jpg


And the unrefurbished 141:
6130170610_a5ed3a31e7_z.jpg
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
I'm going to have to say that my vote goes to southern's 455s (both before and after refurb!)

fetchimage.php

before

fetchimage.php

after

South West Trains managed to make their /8s look nice(r), why couldn't southern!?!


Not my images
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,524
I agree, 455's are pretty nasty.

DMU wise, 143's. Not ugly per se, but uninspiring to look at.

Surprised at the OP's suggestion of 380's - they look modern and striking to my eyes.
 

317663

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2013
Messages
98
Location
Weymouth
I'm going to have to say that my vote goes to southern's 455s (both before and after refurb!)

fetchimage.php

before

fetchimage.php

after

South West Trains managed to make their /8s look nice(r), why couldn't southern!?!


Not my images[/QUOTE

Whaaat?????
The old 455 looks fine. New I will agree on though.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
high level jumper cables on "modern" (ie 80s designed) units are not a good look- the 456s especially. Were the unrefurbished 141s and the 140 the only DMUs of that vintage to have high level cables instead of autocouplers?
 

318259

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2011
Messages
176
The 380s are really nice, but the cab ends look like a train wreck. Quite ironic, since that ugly design is supposed to help in the event of a collision.

Yikes! Those 455s are horrendous. The other trains in the family look so much better. Especially the 318.
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,466
Location
Llandudno
140, 141, 151, 318 (botched refurb front) and 458. The mark 2 based EMU's weren't lookers either!
 

Beveridges

Established Member
Joined
8 Sep 2010
Messages
2,136
Location
BLACKPOOL
Class 380 without a doubt. Horrible.

Voyagers are ugly as far as DMU's go.

MPV's, which are technically a DMU, are really, really ugly.
 

FQ

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
4 Oct 2013
Messages
6,645
Location
-
Class 142 and class 319.
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,892
Location
West Country
DMU - class 140 (the most literal box on wheels we have).
3172826.jpg


EMU - class 333 (simply aesthetically displeasing to my eye)
333_3car_side
 

Hyphen

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Messages
504
Location
Swansea (previously Nottingham/Sheffield)
Not technically a DMU (although it's sporting a Class 252 number here, and HSTs were classed as DEMUs for a while), but the ugliest fronted UK rail vehicle I've ever seen has to be the prototype HST power car.

800px-252001_at_NRM_York_-_DSC07812.JPG

(picture from Wiki)

A couple of historic nominations here (not my photos)- The 151:

Hmmm, I've tried, but I don't actually think I can agree with that. For a train built in the 80s it does have a 'futuristic' look (as such a thing would have been considered back then) with its angled edges. Fairly nice panoramic windscreen for the driver, too (I can't imagine the production gangwayed Sprinters are the best things for looking out the front of). I reckon that'd look decent even in 2014 in Dynamic Lines.

That said, I don't think the interior would be much to write home about in the modern day. I can't find any pictures of the prototype's insides but I couldn't imagine it being any better than the refurbed interiors of today's 150s (i.e. thoroughly depressing).
 
Last edited:

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,275
Hello,

Time for another 318259 "opinion thread".

What, in your opinion, is the ugliest DMU or EMU ever made? Not in terms of livery, just in terms of shape, window position, things like that?

I can't decide between the ScotRail class 380 and the Gatwick Express class 442.

320px-380004_at_Largs_2011.jpg


320px-442411_Gatwick_Express.JPG

I like the look of the piggies (in NSE or SWT trim with their jumper covers)

Plus the fact they're a damn fine unit (again in SWT/NSE trim)
 
Last edited:

43074

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Messages
2,253
Another vote for the 380s from me: in terms of passenger comfort they're great, but aesthetically I'm not keen.

The 458/5s aren't don't look particularly appealing; they're so ugly they make the 458/0s look pleasing to the eye.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Plating over doesn't always have to look horrible- the class 318s are a far neater job than the Southern 455s.

Class 317/7s. What happened there? all the other 317 versions are inoffensive!
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
6,019
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Another vote for the 140. Holy cow, as if the bus body wasn't bad enough. The train equivalent of 'The Homer'.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I like the look of the piggies (in NSE or SWT trim with their jumper covers)

Plus the fact they're a damn fine unit (again in SWT/NSE trim)

The pigs looked far nicer in NSE days before their front jumper panels were semi-permanently removed to prevent injury!

br-442.jpg
 

zn1

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2011
Messages
435
the 317/1, 455/8 still need the edges smoothed off....they got it right on the 317/2 and 455/9 with the modifed nice curved front end on the cab ends...

442 always look good when their connection bonnets are closed(surely a gas bonnet strut to open and close em with a carriage key to secure would have worked) ..to add for me in NSE they looked their best and would have looked superb in Inter city executive...

as a North of river observer of things passing...if its a choice between DES or Electrostar...the electrostar wins on looks alone...


dmu prototypes are what they are....and were tidied up on production and fleet models...
 
Last edited:

al.currie93

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2013
Messages
381
I'm going to have to say that my vote goes to southern's 455s (both before and after refurb!)

fetchimage.php

before

fetchimage.php

after

South West Trains managed to make their /8s look nice(r), why couldn't southern!?!


Not my images

Watch it, 455driver will be along in a minute ;) haha!

I personally like the 455s, but I do have a real soft spot for them as they've always been my local stock (even though 377s started to invade their territory) and I hear that a lot of people find them ugly. I do agree though, Southern's units without the gangways look a bit like they've had their poor noses cut off :(

In Britain, it would have to be the 458, the front end just looks incomplete... as if it never had a nose to cut off :P

I would also agree about the 140, 141 and 126 looking a bit odd too.

For a potential future EMU, I think the Siemens EVO tube train concept blows all of them out of the water:

http://cdn.londonreconnections.com/2013/siemens.jpg

Which is a bit like my current ugly-victor if we include trains from other countries:

http://www.bahnbilder.de/1024/3072011-1240-dsb-ic3-5067-534452.jpg

Not my photographs.
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,588
Location
Leeds
I find the 442s in Southern livery - particularly when it comes to the absence of jumper lead covers - much better from an angle like this, where the Mark 3 bodyshell seems to compensate pretty well.

442 411 + 442 405 at Gatwick Airport 29/04/14 by Sussex Eclectic, on Flickr

Staying on Southern, the 313s aren't ugly, but the shape of the driver and secondman's windows lend it to look quite sad. Maybe I should try and stop applying personification to trains. ;)
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
Those 380's look like they were designed by someone with a Cyberpunk perversion. Quite like the 442's when the jumper cables were covered. The 455's just look like they were designed to do a job and they've done it pretty well. The refurb looks like a tinned up house.
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,588
Location
Leeds
When joining up the gangways on the 380s, it does look fairly cool.

[youtube]ySZtLmS59YY[/youtube]
0:54 onwards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top