• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Scotrail franchise 2014: Main ITT released.

Status
Not open for further replies.

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,139
This week the final ITT will be issued and all bidders can finally make a submission for the new franchise. I'm not sure what day this week, it will take place but hopeful it wont take till Friday.

I do wonder if much will change from the draft ITT which was released a few months ago? Will a few surprise appear from who might make a bid?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

clc

Established Member
Joined
31 Oct 2011
Messages
1,326
What's the rationale for issuing two versions of the ITT?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
They normally issue a draft for consultation, then address any 'stakeholder's comments' then publish the formal ITT. It isn't really two versions as such.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Officially, public consultation and checking for errors, ommissions or badly worded legalese.
Unofficially, bidders provide some feedback as to what is and isnt achievable and whether they would like to do something outside the scope of the draft ITT that would require amendment to the rules to properly capture its benefits. So requirements may become aspirations and more flexibility may be added here and there.

Ususally its only minor amendments but some of the English ones have in on occasion changed radically between the draft and final version, either in length and scope of works or in compensation mechanisms and revenue share.
 
Last edited:

Simon11

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2010
Messages
1,389
Bidders receieved the final ITT last friday.

I can't say much but from what I have seen there are changes here and there along with an extra priced option.
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,139
I have been told it should appear online by Wednesday.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Here IS the TENDER REFERENCE: TS/RD/SER/2013/04

http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/files/documents/rail/Scotrail ITT doc 4855286_45 WEB.pdf

Enjoy.


Commercial Proposition
This is an outline of what we will bring to the market in July 2013;

The new ScotRail Franchise will be for a term of up to 10 years with a review and a decision by the end of year 5 to decide whether the franchise will terminate at the end of year 7 or 10.
There will be a detailed minimum service level specification which bidders will be required to meet. Bidders will be required to offer proposals on how they will stimulate and achieve growth of off-peak patronage leading to better overall utilisation of the rail services.
There will be a regulated fares framework for peak and off-peak services, with freedom to set fares for ‘commercial’ ticket types, e.g. First Class and promotions.
Transport Scotland anticipates a collaborative working relationship in order to achieve maximum mutual benefits with the successful franchisee from capital investment in the Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Project (EGIP), further extensions of the electrified network and the Borders Railway Project.
Bidders will be offered quality incentives based on the existing SQUIRE regime, augmented by incentives based on the National Passenger Satisfaction survey.
Bidders will be required to achieve a minimum performance of 92% ppm increasing to 92.5% by year 4 of the franchise.
Bidders will be required to purchase or lease suitable rolling stock for each of the Service Groups, which will deliver the specified levels of passenger environment and facilities. The condition shall be maintained by phased updates and refurbishment. Bidders will also be responsible for procuring the Rolling Stock for the EGIP Electrification Programme.
Bidders will be required to expand , fully develop and exploit the smartcard infrastructure already being installed in Scotland.
Bidders will be required to provide wi-fi capability on all trains.
Bidders will be encouraged to engage with Network Rail to consider the benefits of an Alliance or other collaborative working relationships, though this will not be a mandatory requirement.
Bidders will be required to achieve a minimum specification of transport integration with other modes and play a key role in securing further integration over the term.
Bidders will be asked to provide financial security of a size that is commensurate with the scale of the franchise and its importance to Scotland.


ITT Issued - January 2014
Submission of ITT responses by bidders - April 2014
Winning bidder notified and mobilisation commenced- October 2014
Franchise Commencement - April 2015.

See more at: http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk...ramme/scotrail-franchise#sthash.aWfhTHQP.dpuf
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
From p135:

Bidders are to give a Priced Option in each of the following five areas (as further detailed below in
Sections 5.1 (Improved Services between Edinburgh and Berwick-upon-Tweed/Newcastle) to 5.5 (Calls
at a new Winchburgh Station)):
• Improved Services between Edinburgh and Berwick-upon-Tweed/Newcastle;
• Improved Services between Stranraer and Glasgow;
• Operating Dunbar Station as the Station Facility Owner;
• New Station at Robroyston.
• New station at Winchburgh; Journey time neutrality should be achieved, where possible through using up pathing time. Where this is not possible journey time increases should be kept to a minimum. Calls at Winchburgh must not be inserted into services between Edinburgh and Glasgow Queen Street via Falkirk High, (Route A1)

Rolling stock minimum attributes, Does this mean the 158's and lower are heading for the bin?
High quality and safe passenger environment consistent with modern inter-urban and regional
passenger rolling stock in the UK and Europe. This condition is to be maintained throughout
the Franchise Term, by means of an interior refresh if necessary.
• Ability to work safely and reliably in the ambient winter / summer weather conditions
experienced in the Network Rail Scotland area.
• Bogied vehicles.
• Standard Class accommodation with a seating density no greater than 2+2.
• Where First/Business Class is provided, there should be a clear differentiation between the
quality of First/Business and Standard Class accommodation.
• Shoulder room and leg room should not be reduced from that currently provided on
each route.
• Air conditioning and appropriate heating including during station stops.
• Toilet provision on board which is no less than currently provided on each route and that
avoids smell being noticeable in seated areas.
• CET provision for on-board toilets shall be in accordance with the environmental
requirements of Section 2.2.2. (Transport Scotland’s Requirements) of Delivery Plan 4
(Sustainability).
• 90% of fleet PRM TSI compliant by 31/12/2018.
• 100% of fleet PRM TSI compliant by 31/12/2019.
• Real-time visual and audible passenger information system. PRM TSI compliance represents
the minimum standard and proposals are invited for provision of additional information, e.g.
train service information and infotainment.
• Facilities for storing large items of luggage within sight/proximity of passengers when seated;
overhead racks for smaller luggage, flexible space for pushchairs/prams and cycle storage
facilities (minimum 2 cycles per unit).
• Wi-Fi capability fully compatible with modern standards.
• 230V power sockets (one per pair of seats) capable of charging a laptop, mobile phone or
similar device.
• Tables at all seats (may be fixed or folding).
• No more than 50% of the seats to be “airline” style layout.
• CCTV coverage and on-board recording at a minimum of 2 fps normal and 25 fps for 2
mins before and 5 mins after a trigger event of all passenger areas (except toilets). System to
include forward facing camera mounted in each driving cab.
• Design to maximise comfort for standing passengers at peak times, e.g. space and
handhold provision.
• Bodyside door locations / width and interior layout to facilitate rapid boarding and alighting
 
Last edited:

Goatboy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,274
Why would this mean the bin for 158's?

Though it'd be nice as we could do with them down here in the South West :D
 

Goatboy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,274
Perhaps due to the slow boarding?

I bet thats a massive problem on the Far North line, I'm sure people making the 3 hour journey to Wick would be really pleased to have doors opening right into the cabin in the middle of winter so that the hundreds of commuters can enter and exit quickly.
 

Surreyman

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2012
Messages
1,020
"• Air conditioning and appropriate heating including during station stops.
• Toilet provision on board which is no less than currently provided on each route and that
avoids smell being noticeable in seated areas.
• CET provision for on-board toilets shall be in accordance with the environmental
requirements of Section 2.2.2. (Transport Scotland’s Requirements) of Delivery Plan 4
(Sustainability)".

Don't know about the 158s but the 3 items quoted above would seem to suggest that the 156s won't be staying in Scotland.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
The first ITT broke down rolling stock fitting requirements by route/journey type and not all required them, are people suggesting sockets has been changed to be a universal requirement?
 

marks87

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
1,658
Location
Dundee
Don't know about the 158s but the 3 items quoted above would seem to suggest that the 156s won't be staying in Scotland.
I think they're going to be around for some time yet, because AFAIK 158s/170s still aren't cleared for either the West Highland nor Glasgow and South Western lines (cleared for ECS only on the latter). And I don't think either route is front of the queue for new stock.
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,784
The first ITT broke down rolling stock fitting requirements by route/journey type and not all required them, are people suggesting sockets has been changed to be a universal requirement?
If it IS a universal requirement, it puts the DfT to shame a little.
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,304
If it IS a universal requirement, it puts the DfT to shame a little.

It is specified as a requirement for every single route other than the South Side electrics from Central HL, i.e. the routes on which 314s run today. Every other route has a requirement for at least one 230V power socket per pair of seats and all routes, including the South Side Electrics, require WiFi. Not only that but there is a requirement for 90% of trains on any route to be TSI-PRM compliant a year before the 2020 deadline, and all new (obviously) or cascaded trains to Scotland must be made compliant in order to be able to be used. There is also a maximum of only 50% of seats being 'airline style' and the density of standard class travel cannot increase above what it is today. All in all it seems like quite a challenging ITT to meet.
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,784
Challenging but admirable, IMHO. These small changes can make travelling by train significantly nicer - free, usable (ie actually better than using phoneternet - I'm looking at you, Pendolinos...) wifi and power sockets being the biggest ones for me.
 

cf111

Established Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,395
I bet thats a massive problem on the Far North line, I'm sure people making the 3 hour journey to Wick would be really pleased to have doors opening right into the cabin in the middle of winter so that the hundreds of commuters can enter and exit quickly.

If they can knock an hour and a bit off the journey time to Wick I'll be very impressed! :D:
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,139
If they can knock an hour and a bit off the journey time to Wick I'll be very impressed! :D:

Hasn't there been talk for years of getting rid of the wick line and enhancing the coach route to every hour?
 

cf111

Established Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,395
Hasn't there been talk for years of getting rid of the wick line and enhancing the coach route to every hour?

I can't honestly say I've heard anything of the like, but I'm not "in the know" at all.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
Last I heard were proposals for bridging the Dornoch Firth and closing about 5 or 6 of the stations that would be avoided, including Alness and Tain. Haven't got a clue how long that would save though.
 

D1009

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2012
Messages
3,166
Location
Stoke Gifford
Last I heard were proposals for bridging the Dornoch Firth and closing about 5 or 6 of the stations that would be avoided, including Alness and Tain. Haven't got a clue how long that would save though.
I'm sure when the Dornoch bridge was built it was suggested to be road and rail which would have meant the closure of the "avoided" stations, and that is why the proposal was rejected.

To be honest when I travel up there speed isn't my first concern.
 

Bodiddly

Member
Joined
7 Feb 2013
Messages
648
Last I heard were proposals for bridging the Dornoch Firth and closing about 5 or 6 of the stations that would be avoided, including Alness and Tain. Haven't got a clue how long that would save though.

Sorry to correct you but Alness and Tain are South of the proposed Dornoch Bridge, and wouldn't be affected by the crossing. Stations hypothetically affected would be Ardgay, Culrain, Invershin, Lairg and Rogart. This is an old argument that's never going to happen for two reasons. Reason one, cost. You couldn't recoup the cost of a bridge in a million years and two, cutting train services to the communities of Ardgay (including Bonar Bridge) and Lairg would never be allowed under the new TFS franchise agreement.
The thing is, we want improved transport links in Scotland, not line and station closures. These are traditional loss making lines heavily subsidised by the taxpayer. Do you really think they would still be open if our privatised TOCS had their way? The only reason they escaped the Beeching axe is because they served strategic Ports and were still viable freight and passenger carrying lines at the time. Granted, they maybe need a business model to generate more freight and passenger numbers, but until then, they will never be more than a local community railway.
I know, I travel on it most days!
 

Argosy

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
193
Not sure how having a priced option for Stranraer line services under the guise of improving services between Stranraer and Glasgow means you don't have to actually provide a through train is an improvement!

I'd like to see the reaction to a WCML franchise which said you don't actually have to connect Glasgow and London but instead trains can terminate at Crewe provided a greater frequency is provided between Glasgow Central and Crewe.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,671
Not sure how having a priced option for Stranraer line services under the guise of improving services between Stranraer and Glasgow means you don't have to actually provide a through train is an improvement!

I'd like to see the reaction to a WCML franchise which said you don't actually have to connect Glasgow and London but instead trains can terminate at Crewe provided a greater frequency is provided between Glasgow Central and Crewe.

Apples and Oranges i am afraid there....
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,139
Has anyone else spotted the details about how the Scottish Government has reserved the right to terminate the franchise?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/visitandlearn/72027.aspx

Abellio - ScotRail Franchise (MSPs and invited guests)
Starts: 21/01/2014 18:00
Finishes: 21/01/2014 20:00
Location: Garden Lobby
Sponsor: Patrick Harvie MSP ( GREEN)

This event provides an opportunity for Members to meet senior representatives from Abellio to share their current experiences and future expectation of rail services in Scotland.

Nothing else is coming up on the Scottish Parliament Calendar in connection to any other operator. Does anyone know what happened at this event? Are the Green Party nailing its support for Abellio?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Does anyone know why National Express are holding talks with local groups about the franchise?

http://www.fortwilliamchamber.co.uk...-with-national-express-on-scotrail-franchise/


Transport Scotland has shortlisted five rail operators who will bid for the main ScotRail franchise: Dutch operator Abellio, Arriva, FirstGroup, Hong Kong-based MTR and National Express. Three rail operators have been shortlisted for the Sleeper service franchise: Arriva Night Trains, FirstGroup and Serco.

Lesley Benfield (CEO of Fort William Chamber) and Stewart Maclean met with Mary Grant, National Express Managing Director, Business Development on Monday 27th January 2014, to discuss their bid for the main ScotRail contract. Mary Grant is known in Fort William from her previous role as Managing Director of FirstGroup and leading FirstGroup to its successful bid for the ScotRail in 2004. National Express, who ran the original ScotRail franchise between 1997 and 2004, engaged Mary in 2013 to lead their bid for the franchise. The meeting was the first pro-active bidder consultation to be held with the Chamber in Fort William, despite sleeper franchise bids being submitted in December 2013 and it was felt to be very constructive by both parties

Members of the Chamber of Commerce and the wider business community are invited by National Express to provide their views and assist with the development of their bid which will submitted to Transport Scotland on 17th April 2014. Follow this link to the full (169 page) ‘Invitation to Tender’ document: www.transportscotland.gov.uk/rail/scottish-franchise-renewal-programme/scotrail-franchise “
 

Argosy

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
193
Nothing else is coming up on the Scottish Parliament Calendar in connection to any other operator. Does anyone know what happened at this event? Are the Green Party nailing its support for Abellio?

The event was excellent. Abellio set their stall out very clearly and divided their team into 7 sections viz: Stations, Rolling Stock, Operations, Ticketing, Community Rail, Cycling, Sustainability thus it was easy to approach them all.

--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Does anyone know why National Express are holding talks with local groups about the franchise?

http://www.fortwilliamchamber.co.uk...-with-national-express-on-scotrail-franchise/[/QUOTE]

Why wouldn't they?
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,139
Does any of the local groups have any real say towards the minsters on who could win the bid?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Which company does everyone else believe will get the new franchise?

I believe it’s turning into a three horse race with, Arriva and Hong Kong-based MTR, not really in the running.

I get the feeling Nat Express may also be out of its league due to past issues, ie East Coast etc.

Which just leaves, what I believe are the only two companies with a chance:

First or Abellio.
 

Argosy

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
193
Does any of the local groups have any real say towards the minsters on who could win the bid?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Which company does everyone else believe will get the new franchise?

I believe it’s turning into a three horse race with, Arriva and Hong Kong-based MTR, not really in the running.

I get the feeling Nat Express may also be out of its league due to past issues, ie East Coast etc.

Which just leaves, what I believe are the only two companies with a chance:

First or Abellio.

The local groups probably have very little influence on the final decision. They are all encouraged to meet the bidders and I know of one group that has met two of them.

The particular interest in south west is the decimation of the railway service based purely on a transport operating practice. It seems absolutely bizarre that whilst there has been a policy of joining up journeys (e.g. west of Scotland North Clyde to East Clyde to Edinburgh and now to North Berwick) yet on the Stranraer line the exact opposite is proposed as an alternative costed option, with no through services north of Ayr, now even including Kilmarnock. The aspiring SCRP are seeking a basic Kilmarnock - Ayr - Girvan/Stranraer service with boat trains reintroduced to underpin the route south of Girvan.

With regard to the eventual winners talking behind the scenes, I would say that Abellio are quite highly thought of, Nat Ex have the advantage of a very charismatic bid director and First are a Scottish company.
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,304
The local groups probably have very little influence on the final decision. They are all encouraged to meet the bidders and I know of one group that has met two of them.

The particular interest in south west is the decimation of the railway service based purely on a transport operating practice. It seems absolutely bizarre that whilst there has been a policy of joining up journeys (e.g. west of Scotland North Clyde to East Clyde to Edinburgh and now to North Berwick) yet on the Stranraer line the exact opposite is proposed as an alternative costed option, with no through services north of Ayr, now even including Kilmarnock. The aspiring SCRP are seeking a basic Kilmarnock - Ayr - Girvan/Stranraer service with boat trains reintroduced to underpin the route south of Girvan.

With regard to the eventual winners talking behind the scenes, I would say that Abellio are quite highly thought of, Nat Ex have the advantage of a very charismatic bid director and First are a Scottish company.

I wouldn't call it decimation if the frequency and journey time to Glasgow would be the same or better than it is today. Those 156s running under the wires at 75mph on a 100mph electrified line are not a good use of resources, especially when the rail network is going to need as many DMUs as it can in the next decade or so. Once the DMU shortage has been sorted by electrification and cascades, the service provision for the South-West can be looked at again. If a TOC somewhere orders some bi-modal commuter/regional DMUs then an additional order to cover routes like Stranraer would be ideal for the through service to return again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top