• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Future of the East Coast EMT Rake

Status
Not open for further replies.

gage75

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2009
Messages
306
Given that E.C. are soon to get the much lamented (time taken too decide to go for it) IEP stock are they likely to refurb the brought in EMT MK3's, as was travelling on this rake on wed31 Oct, I was less than impressed in with the lack of comfort as compared to the regular E.C. MK3's
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,853
Location
Oakham
Interesting, because when I travel on the ECML I try as far as possible to get the EMT rake because I find the EMT seats far more comfortable than the EC "Mallard" seats...
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,672
I think the one the are permanently keeping has been converted but one is still just a long term loan.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,414
Location
Yorks
Interesting, because when I travel on the ECML I try as far as possible to get the EMT rake because I find the EMT seats far more comfortable than the EC "Mallard" seats...

Indeed. Very much down to personal preference.

I remember going down to London for work one day and being pleasantly surprised to end up on the EMT one. And there are plenty who prefer the Mallard seats as well.
 

Aldaniti

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Messages
668
I much prefer the EMT set. Only trouble is, the different seating arrangements bugger up the reservations! Mallard first class is OK but Mallard standard class seats are awful in my opinion, on a par with their equally awful Virgin equivalents. It's harder, designed to be longer lasting, meaning more profit.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,749
Location
Nottingham
I've been on this a couple of times recently and was pleased to find that it had acquired power sockets and wi-fi. The EMT ones don't have sockets and when I first used this rake on EC it didn't have either sockets or wi-fi. I guess installing wi-fi is fairly cheap but it looks like some fairly serious money has been spent to install the sockets.
 
Last edited:

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,128
Location
Redcar
It's harder, designed to be longer lasting, meaning more profit.

Actually it's designed to meet modern safety standards which have stringent requirements when it comes to things like fire proofing and impact resistance. Meaning that stuffing a seat full of foam is quite hard to do as it needs to not burn and the seatback itself much more substantial. Also it's the same reason why we don't have low backed seating any more as it needs to help restrain the head.

So there's a little more to it that 'more profit'. BR would have been hamstrung in just the same way had it survived.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,749
Location
Nottingham
Yes it probably means less profit and/or higher fares. Given how rare accidents are, it would be interesting to see a safety cost-benefit of the larger seats.
 

38Cto15E

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2009
Messages
1,119
Location
15E
Am I correct in saying that East Midlands Trains HSTs do not have folding armrests in First where as East Coast and First Great Western do have folding arm rests in First Class on their HSTs?
 

tom1649

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
990
Actually it's designed to meet modern safety standards which have stringent requirements when it comes to things like fire proofing and impact resistance. Meaning that stuffing a seat full of foam is quite hard to do as it needs to not burn and the seatback itself much more substantial. Also it's the same reason why we don't have low backed seating any more as it needs to help restrain the head.

So there's a little more to it that 'more profit'. BR would have been hamstrung in just the same way had it survived.

I think I'd rather have the extra comfort and have the miniscule risk of accident or injury. Interesting that LUL S8 Stock with the transverse seating are low backed. I take it there's an exemption on these.

I much prefer the old IC70 seats to any of the rock hard overly high backed seats we have today.
 
Last edited:

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,128
Location
Redcar
You might (and to an extent I might) but those that draw up the standards disagree.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
Am I correct in saying that East Midlands Trains HSTs do not have folding armrests in First where as East Coast and First Great Western do have folding arm rests in First Class on their HSTs?
That is my experience of their first class seating, (whether running on the MML or the ECML).
 

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
1,083
Location
The Far North
East Caast released a press release a few months ago stating that EC64 (EMT Set) will be refurbished to East Coast Standards to make a uniform rake of HST in time for when the Franchise is re-let.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,414
Location
Yorks
East Caast released a press release a few months ago stating that EC64 (EMT Set) will be refurbished to East Coast Standards to make a uniform rake of HST in time for when the Franchise is re-let.

Seems rather a waste, considering EMT have only just done it !
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,665
Seems rather a waste, considering EMT have only just done it !

Can they use the old gner colours or would this incur a cost ;)

At least we will see a grey hst!

The set is a mess at the moment with both first great Western and emt seating
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
...Interesting that LUL S8 Stock with the transverse seating are low backed. I take it there's an exemption on these.

There may be major differences between the rules for stock designed for 50 mph and that designed for 125 mph...
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,795
Location
Somewhere, not in London
There may be major differences between the rules for stock designed for 50 mph and that designed for 125 mph...

100km/h...(!)

That's 62mph in Church of England, and before anyone moans that they never get up to 60mph on the Met, they do on the Fast/Main between Harrow OTH and Watford S Jcn and between Watford N Jcn and Ammersham...
 

3141

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2012
Messages
2,124
Location
Whitchurch, Hampshire
There may be major differences between the rules for stock designed for 50 mph and that designed for 125 mph...

Also, is there a difference in the sort of whiplash neck injury you might suffer if sitting sideways rather than facing forwards or backwards when an accident occurs?
 

pdq

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2010
Messages
901
Went to London for the day yesterday with the family. HSTs both ways, even though on Leeds to KGX services with no need for diesel. We had a Mallard to KGX and EMT back. Thought the EMT was horrible in comparison - especially for the children (8 and 4) as the seat cushions kept falling off when they perched on the edges to do drawings etc and the armrests were fixed in place. Lighting is also very bright and harsh. In essence, the Mallard felt a cosy, comfortable place to be, but the EMT I would describe as plain and functional.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,194
Location
0035
Also, is there a difference in the sort of whiplash neck injury you might suffer if sitting sideways rather than facing forwards or backwards when an accident occurs?
The S8 stock has both transverse and longitudinal seating.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,414
Location
Yorks
Lighting is something that seems to be difficult for train fitters to get right. The 158's have the nicest ambience (with the exception of traditional tungsten lighting).
 

gage75

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2009
Messages
306
Went to London for the day yesterday with the family. HSTs both ways, even though on Leeds to KGX services with no need for diesel. We had a Mallard to KGX and EMT back. Thought the EMT was horrible in comparison - especially for the children (8 and 4) as the seat cushions kept falling off when they perched on the edges to do drawings etc and the armrests were fixed in place. Lighting is also very bright and harsh. In essence, the Mallard felt a cosy, comfortable place to be, but the EMT I would describe as plain and functional.

would have to agree, at being six foot plus and of a larger than average size to match much prefer the Mallard seating over the EMT set, in particular the armrests
 

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,498
Location
Norwich
Yes it probably means less profit and/or higher fares. Given how rare accidents are, it would be interesting to see a safety cost-benefit of the larger seats.

So shall we remove inflatable slides and seatbelts from planes? Lifeboats from ships? Airbags from cars?

I mean who cares if the structural integrity of the 390 is widely regarded as the reason there was only one fatality at Greyrigg but the seats are not very comfy... :roll:
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,749
Location
Nottingham
So shall we remove inflatable slides and seatbelts from planes? Lifeboats from ships? Airbags from cars?

I mean who cares if the structural integrity of the 390 is widely regarded as the reason there was only one fatality at Greyrigg but the seats are not very comfy... :roll:

It's a question of what is appropriate and reasonable. If you seek absolute safety then you'd never get out of bed in the morning (and eventually die of starvation or bedsores).

There is plenty of evidence that most of the other measures you mention are worthwhile in safety terms, although I believe if you wear you seatbelt then airbags are largely redundant.

The structural integrity of the 390, as relevant to Greyrigg, was no different to that of a Mk3 coach, which has experienced several derailments at similarly high speeds with similar high survivability. In fact a high speed derailment in any modern train is eminently survivable unless it hits something solid.
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,665
Is it certain the set will recieve a new interior?

Standardisation with regards coupling and catering has already taken place I believe
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,128
Location
Redcar
Standardisation with regards coupling and catering has already taken place I believe

Coupling? An HST rake is an HST rake as far as I'm aware...

So what needed changing about the coupling?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top