• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The Railway: First Great Western on Channel 5

Status
Not open for further replies.

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
It's not that unusual for the sleeper to have the labels up for the opposite direction.

I refer you to post 322 ma lud! ;)
it also showed the down train at Reading and then switched to it leaving Paddington, it showed the 'day' coaches behind the loco and then switched to the sleepers being behind the loco. There were loads of continuity errors in it again, its not a bad program but it cant be that difficult to get most of it right can it?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,228
Indeed, I couldn't remember if the label was seen in the bits at Paddington or when on the move. It seemed to be two journeys mashed together, one up and one down. The cab views appeared to be a down service, based on it being light in parts and on a two track section, it wouldn't normally be light on the up service until close to London.
 

Temple Meads

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2010
Messages
2,283
Location
Devon
Indeed, I couldn't remember if the label was seen in the bits at Paddington or when on the move. It seemed to be two journeys mashed together, one up and one down. The cab views appeared to be a down service, based on it being light in parts and on a two track section, it wouldn't normally be light on the up service until close to London.

The label was on what was purported to be the down journey on the move. As you said, it's far from unusual for a stray label from the other direction to still be up.

The cab view looked liked the Ivybridge area to me, although I might be wrong..
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
The cab view looked liked the Ivybridge area to me, although I might be wrong..
John (the driver) got on at Exeter on the down so you are probably correct, and was 'interviewed' outside Plymouth station but none of that was shown unfortunately. ;)

I know this because I was on the train.
 

David Goddard

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
1,515
Location
Ely
And the woman standing on the platform smoking too

So was the offender. In the company of two rail staff and a BTP officer. Had they intervened, and it had been shown on the film, it would have been a good sign , and warning to others, that staff enforce the ban, which has been in place since 2007. Instead it showed that no action is taken and one can get away win it.
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
So was the offender. In the company of two rail staff and a BTP officer. Had they intervened, and it had been shown on the film, it would have been a good sign , and warning to others, that staff enforce the ban, which has been in place since 2007. Instead it showed that no action is taken and one can get away win it.

It actually shows common sense policing in the sense that when a situation like that occurs the 'bull in a China shop' approach of arresting straight away, carting them off for a night in the, probably already overfull, police cells and wasting police time sorting out what was a relatively minor offence and done in the heat of the moment and probably not intentionally isn't the bast approach and may make a calm situation into a more dangerous one by acting heavy handedly. Calming the situation seems like the more sensible approach to me and little would be gained by winding the guy up by telling him stop smoking etc.

To be honest, I wouldn't worry to much about it. Enforcing such a smoking ban where alcohol is involved with only a light scattering of staff and police is probably a pretty stupid idea.

Personally I never say anything to people I see smoking on stations when I'm in uniform. I'm not that stupid and know I am likely to come off worse if the person smoking takes offence to me asking them to put the cigarette out.
 

1e10

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2013
Messages
815
I was shocked to see how many people were intending to travel without purchasing a ticket shown in the scenes at Reading. I know people fare evade but I had no idea such large groups do it.
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,896
Location
South Wales
I was shocked to see how many people were intending to travel without purchasing a ticket shown in the scenes at Reading. I know people fare evade but I had no idea such large groups do it.

It is not actually that uncommon among students believe me I have been a student although I am pleased to say I always bought a ticket even on those occasions where I could have gotten a free ride. For example the conducter hasnt come through the train when I have travelled from Pyle to Port Talbot Parkway as they have remained in the cab but I purchased a ticket from the booking office.

You will also find students trying all sorts of trips to get a free bus ride especially passing their tickets to their freinds when the driver hasnt been looking. (Watch episode two of the Routemasters on BBC2 which is on youtube and you will see some examples of what I am talking about)

I am sure some of the staff who are members on this forum will have some stories to tell us
 
Last edited:
Joined
9 Apr 2012
Messages
177
It actually shows common sense policing in the sense that when a situation like that occurs the 'bull in a China shop' approach of arresting straight away, carting them off for a night in the, probably already overfull, police cells and wasting police time sorting out what was a relatively minor offence and done in the heat of the moment and probably not intentionally isn't the bast approach and may make a calm situation into a more dangerous one by acting heavy handedly. Calming the situation seems like the more sensible approach to me and little would be gained by winding the guy up by telling him stop smoking etc.

100% correct.

Must admit wasn't sure what to make of the bloke in charge at Reading. Think he had the right intentions but thought he handled the Slough ticket situation very poorly indeed. Again, despite liking the way he handed a couple of other things (the young lad with the ticket to Reading West was quite funny), did think he came out of it all looking like a bit of a knob, which probably isn't true.
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
100% correct.

Must admit wasn't sure what to make of the bloke in charge at Reading. Think he had the right intentions but thought he handled the Slough ticket situation very poorly indeed. Again, despite liking the way he handed a couple of other things (the young lad with the ticket to Reading West was quite funny), did think he came out of it all looking like a bit of a knob, which probably isn't true.

My thoughts exactly. It's difficult to make a judgment, given the amount of editing involved.

Nice to see a former Reading colleague at Didcot Parkway too!
 

Andrewlong

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2013
Messages
373
Location
Earley
I was shocked to see how many people were intending to travel without purchasing a ticket shown in the scenes at Reading. I know people fare evade but I had no idea such large groups do it.

I live to the east of Reading on the Waterloo line where there are no barriers until you reach Bracknell station. It is not uncommon to see groups of young people get on at Wokingham and off before reaching Reading with little intention of buying a ticket.

Once the barriers are open at Reading, they continue their free travel into the town centre until someone decides to close the barriers.

Ticket checks on trains between Reading and Waterloo are rare - guards appear to have enough to do with the opening/closing doors at all the stations where train stops!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I saw the Revenue Protection chief seen at Windsor and Henley on the tv series at Reading station talking to a SWT guard. Does said RP chap work for FGW or many TOC's ?

Reason I ask was he was very chummy with guard and didn't appear to be wearing an obvious FGW uniform today!
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,896
Location
South Wales
I live to the east of Reading on the Waterloo line where there are no barriers until you reach Bracknell station. It is not uncommon to see groups of young people get on at Wokingham and off before reaching Reading with little intention of buying a ticket.

Once the barriers are open at Reading, they continue their free travel into the town centre until someone decides to close the barriers.

Ticket checks on trains between Reading and Waterloo are rare - guards appear to have enough to do with the opening/closing doors at all the stations where train stops!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I saw the Revenue Protection chief seen at Windsor and Henley on the tv series at Reading station talking to a SWT guard. Does said RP chap work for FGW or many TOC's ?

Reason I ask was he was very chummy with guard and didn't appear to be wearing an obvious FGW uniform today!

If he wasnt wearing a FGW uniform then I would say he is off duty and just chatting to a member of SWT staff he seems to know. You see it with FGW and ATW staff at Cardiff Central and Bristol TM.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,859
Location
Stirlingshire
So was the offender. In the company of two rail staff and a BTP officer. Had they intervened, and it had been shown on the film, it would have been a good sign , and warning to others, that staff enforce the ban, which has been in place since 2007. Instead it showed that no action is taken and one can get away win it.

Thank God not everyone has such a puritanical zeal :roll:
 

dave55uk

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
106
Location
Ely, England.
I think the guy at Didcot nearer the end (with the bicycle and cap) was playing up to the camera a bit too much. IMV, it made him look a pillock.
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
I think the guy at Didcot nearer the end (with the bicycle and cap) was playing up to the camera a bit too much. IMV, it made him look a pillock.

Naw, he's a very nice chap, definite character, and he does bounce around the place like that - there was no playing it up!
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
3,037
Location
81D & 81E
I think the guy at Didcot nearer the end (with the bicycle and cap) was playing up to the camera a bit too much. IMV, it made him look a pillock.

Ha ha, no that's normal. My first boss on the railway, he certainly is a character! Was good to work for.
 

alex595

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2011
Messages
54
Hey, I have seen them do East Coast, FGW and i have seen The tube series. Do you reckon they would do my locals which are C2C and Greater Anglia?
 

bicbasher

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2010
Messages
1,840
Location
London
Catching up with last weeks episode. A FGW employee at Ealing Broadway refunded a passengers Oyster after touching in. Does Ealing Broadway have an LU terminal or can it be refunded using FGW's terminals?
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Really good episode last night, once again. Anyone notice the cab light being on in the middle of the Severn Tunnel? Plus, the guy who probably rang his guardian to pre-warn them of the RPO asking for his DOB annoyed me quite a lot.
Also, nice to see the guy from the Beeb series at Twyford :D

Is there any specific rule against the cab light being on whilst in a tunnel? I notice a lot of drivers on London Underground driving with the cab light on.
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
Is there any specific rule against the cab light being on whilst in a tunnel? I notice a lot of drivers on London Underground driving with the cab light on.

Nope, no rule at all. Obviously it's easier to see in the dark with the light off but in long tunnel sections you often can't see anything anyway (train headlights aren't any good at lightning up the road ahead) so it makes little difference if the cab light is on.
 

HowardGWR

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
4,981
Nope, no rule at all. Obviously it's easier to see in the dark with the light off but in long tunnel sections you often can't see anything anyway (train headlights aren't any good at lightning up the road ahead) so it makes little difference if the cab light is on.

Don't anyone point out that they could otherwise not read their newspaper - whoops, I just did! :D
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Most LU drivers have the cab light off, whenever they are driving. An inactive cab (one without a key in) will always have the lights on, for security reasons, presumably so that you can see if there is someone in there who shouldn't be there!
 

38Cto15E

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2009
Messages
1,119
Location
15E
I missed last weeks episode (Number 4) and Virgin Media seem to have removed it from their On Demand service, after originally being listed.

I tried Channel 5 On Demand but the video wasn't available, maybe I need to log in? I have also tried Youtube and again only 1, 2 and 3 available.

Is there a legal reason that last weeks episode is not available?
TIA
 

ruggers

Member
Joined
26 Sep 2013
Messages
5
would have been more entertaining if they had let those clubbers through one way, then close the barriers coming back (probably more lucrative for the TOC too!!)
 

Dieseldriver

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2012
Messages
1,020
Is there any specific rule against the cab light being on whilst in a tunnel? I notice a lot of drivers on London Underground driving with the cab light on.

Funnily enough a few LU drivers told me some prefer to have it on coming into stations as they reckon someone's less likely to jump in front of a train when they can see the driver!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top