• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Electric routes that aren't the "headline" routes

Status
Not open for further replies.

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,395
Well, it occurs to me that in most cases, if there is an electrified route (I mean in terms of a direct service) between two cities/large towns that it will tend to be the primary route between them.

For instance the WCML is the primary route between London and Birmingham rather than the Chiltern Main Line.

I was wondering how many exceptions there are to this pattern? ie. where the primary service is diesel-operated despite an electric option existing.

I can think of two myself, one is Edinburgh-Glasgow since the electrification of the ECML, and the other is Reading-London.

Are there any others?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,395
Sorry, I meant to add where the primary routes are diesel operated :oops:
 

JamesRowden

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
1,762
Location
Ilfracombe
Does Amersham to London count since the Chiltern service is faster than the Metropolitan line (or do they count as the same route)?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,955
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Some would say the primary route from Bradford to Leeds is the GN via Bramley, whereas it's the longer Midland route via Shipley that is wired.

The current primary route between Manchester and Liverpool is the CLC via Warrington Central.
The shorter Chat Moss route is being electrified but is currently the secondary route.
 
Last edited:

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,064
Location
Reston City Centre
Manchester to Wigan in a year or two?

I agree with LNW-GW Joint's examples too.

Before the CP5 announcement, I had a hunch that the Manchester - Leeds route via the Calder Valley had a better chance of electrification than the route via Huddersfield (since the Calder Valley services were more "self contained" than the longer distance routes from Middlesbrough/ Scarborough/ Hull that serve the Huddersfield route). Obviously I've been proved wrong!
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,375
Location
Yorkshire
How about Rochdale to Manchester? The direct heavy-rail route via Moston is diesel, with the Metrolink line via Oldham being (obviously) electrified...
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,874
Manchester-Styal-Crewe
That's the route the branch to Manchester airport comes off right? What makes that the primary route rather than via Stockport? Is the Styal route faster? Isn't Stockport an important stop?

Another example perhaps is Liverpool - Manchester. I don't think any route between the two is electrified yet, but is the orriginal railway (the one being electrified) still the primary route today?
 

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,505
For long distance services, the southerly route is currently more important. That will change once the Northern Hub works are complete.
 

AndyLandy

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2011
Messages
1,323
Location
Southampton, UK
Does Amersham to London count since the Chiltern service is faster than the Metropolitan line (or do they count as the same route)?

I guess that could be said of Birmingham-Manchester, too. The 'direct' service is an XC diesel service, although the whole route is electrified and can be undertaken entirely with electric traction if you change at Stafford, Stoke or Crewe.
 

AndyLandy

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2011
Messages
1,323
Location
Southampton, UK
It's stock balancing; getting a unit from Longsight onto a Birmingham diagram.

I suspected it would be something along those lines. If you've got to do an ECS from the Manchester area to Birmingham, you might as well see if you can actually run it as a passenger service.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,955
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Cambridge is an interesting case.
The GN route from King's Cross via Hitchin is 2.25 miles longer than the GE route from Liverpool St via the Lea Valley.
For many years, the "Buffet Car Expresses" ran via the Lea Valley which was considered the main line, with only very limited stoppers via Hitchin.
But since electrification of both routes in 1987/88 the GN route has had much faster and more frequent trains and is now clearly the main line.
The Lea Valley line capacity is now optimised for Stansted Airport and other local traffic.
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
Fast MML HSTs/Meridians between London St Pancras and Luton Airport Parkway/Luton/Bedford are surely contenders, versus stopping FCC 377s/319s.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,205
Fast MML HSTs/Meridians between London St Pancras and Luton Airport Parkway/Luton/Bedford are surely contenders, versus stopping FCC 377s/319s.

All using the same, electrified route... Going by that could you perhaps say the same thing for HC vs FGW, or Jubilee/Metropolitan vs Chiltern.
 

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,458
Location
Milton Keynes
If the Chiltern Main Line and Risborough-Claydon are wired as has often been suggested could happen in CP6, that could create an example of this. Then again they could decide the Amersham line was secondary. Apparently via High Wycombe can actually be faster with few stops.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top