If the circumstances are special any train crew might use their discretion.
I don;t think that anyoen involved in trying to protect revenue should make any decision based on a notional amount of how much they think the person has cost the TOC.
I don't think it is a very good argument to say that 'The fare I evaded is only £3.80' any more than it is to say that 'I should stand in First because I have a ticket for Standard and I can't be bothered to move'. Both should be dealt with, neither ignored.
Of course, in the real world a lot more factors do come into play, which may mean the other passengers perception is that someone has 'got away' with soemthing.
That still doesn't make it right.
There's a lot of common sense on this forum. Just because someone doesn't share your opinion doesn't mean their opinion isn't based on common sense as well.
I can see the logic and sense behind your argument, I just don't think it is right!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I don't think anyone has disagreed with that, though I may have missed something!
I was merely talking about whether standing in a FC vestibule is more or less of an offence than having no ticket? To me they are the same *disruption and discretion excepted).
For sure it is good we don't all agree on everything, what a boring world we would live in then.
Yes my point was always about exceptional circumstances, I was getting frustrated that this element seemed to be forgotten in most replies I have received.
I am a stickler for the rules under normal circumstances.
I still stand firm that the easy targets are aimed at rather than the people that daily cheat the system.