anthony263
Established Member
I do feel sorry for the driver in this case and I do hope his bosses will stick with him and if he had waited there for the potential for inccident with the other passengers onboard if the drunks started kicking off.
According to the BBC, the 'girl' was 22 and had been to a 'Christmas Celebration.'
Not trying to defend the driver, but I wouldn't be surprised if she was at least mildly drunk...
People seem to be regarded as children if they are under 30 these days!!!
I hate the use of the word "girl" in these kind of articles - we are talking about an adult (not a bus driver leaving a twelve year old to get molested).
Only females though. Young men are described as young men and are a terror upon the population as has never been seen before. Or that's what the news would have you believe :roll:
I've worked in youth services before and in today's world, the words 'girl' or 'boy' or 'lad' or anything similar could in certain circumstances be used to describe anyone under 25. The term 'young adult' is more politically correct. But since when has the Daily Mail ever been a fan of political correctness?
Sadly this is true.
Changing the article to suggest that she was an adult (and therefore could have been expected to have a cash card/ have friends with her/ have a mobile etc) changes the tone from "girl" too much to suit their agenda I guess.
Much easier to blame the nasty bus driver for letting a young girl come into this kind of trouble (rather than telling a more complicated story). Pathetic.
Since it's been said "why didn't the other passengers put forward the cash", I can't speak for everyone on the bus, but I wouldn't have given her 20p because I don't carry change with me any more. Everything is paid for with a card, or a bus pass, or train tickets; sure I carry a 20 in my wallet for emergencies but that's not exactly breakable. (I say this politely when anyone asks me for spare change but they never believe it, names/spit usually follows)
It always was negative - "It's more than my job's worth to let you do that", meaning that flexibility and discretion are never used. And if you believe that the letter of the rulebook is inevitably fair.....well, you have obviously never read a rulebookI don't understand how jobsworth gained its negative connotations, surely all it means is that the rules are enforced by the letter of the book (which means fairly)....
Isn't that down to Stagecoach (The service is jointly run or something? Never quite understood). Hardly relevant though.How long until somebody suggests that the reason it's trent barton's fault is because Pronto doesn't accept mango, and had she been able to use Mango she could have gone into a negative balance
I don't know the area, but what kind of bus fare is £5? Surely that's not a single trip?
Thank you Heinz 57 for posting "the other side" to this story, makes things much much clearer. I look forward to the apology in the Daily Fail, oh wait a minute they never do apologise for lying do they after all its all about selling newspapers at all costs isnt it.
No probs.
Yeah it is good to see both sides of the story. The unfortinate thing is, there are a lot of people around the area who won't see the other side. They'll only see what the media says. It will give the trent barton a bad image for something that isn't there fault.
I was also told that the other day, some camera crews turned up at Langley Mill wanting an interview. They didn't get one, so the news went on as saying that Trent Barton refused to comment. No, it isn't that, the news turned up un-announced demanding an interview, the managers at Trent are busy and didn't have time. Should they have rang up earlyer and asked for one, then they probably would have got it.
Yeah it is good to see both sides of the story. The unfortinate thing is, there are a lot of people around the area who won't see the other side. They'll only see what the media says. It will give the trent barton a bad image for something that isn't there fault.
What if the rapist was known to the police? Is it now their fault? Or the fault of his parents... where would it end?
it has to be said that this is a very BIG public relations disaster for Trent Barton who always play on their customer freindly approach
And like most PR disasters it's totally unjustified. The power the news media has is frightening![]()