• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why did this train lose 10 minutes?

Status
Not open for further replies.

zoneking

Member
Joined
3 Jul 2009
Messages
283
The 2G47 1633 London Waterloo to Guildford, departing on 7th January 2025, departed Waterloo 4 minutes late but arrived in Guildford 14 minutes late. I am wondering where the extra 10 minutes of delay came from.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:Y20346/2025-01-07/detailed#allox_id=0

I was not on this journey but was on the next journey made by this train, to London Waterloo via Epsom, getting off at Epsom 12 minutes late. I ask because this particular train is very frequently late and there is only 1 train an hour to Epsom at this time of day.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-01-08 114300.png
    Screenshot 2025-01-08 114300.png
    306.2 KB · Views: 145
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,129
Location
Wilmslow
Extended station dwell times appear to be the main culprit. As you show in your extract.
The train spent longer in a number of stations than the working timetable allows for.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,195
From a layman's view surely 450s really aren't suitable for the mainline suburban network. Too many stops combined with a slow door cycle. It only requires a guard who's slow to release the doors and and a cautious driver and I can see how this might happen.
 

swidnod

Member
Joined
25 Mar 2010
Messages
561
From a layman's view surely 450s really aren't suitable for the mainline suburban network. Too many stops combined with a slow door cycle. It only requires a guard who's slow to release the doors and and a cautious driver and I can see how this might happen.
3 mins at Surbiton and another 3 before Guildford attributed to non DOO station dwell.
4 min late start and the other minutes were due to traffic conflict due to late running.
 

zoneking

Member
Joined
3 Jul 2009
Messages
283
Thanks, some passengers agree that this type of Desiro is not suited to suburban stopping services. However, the turnaround for this service is tight and the journey back lost no time.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,195
Thanks, some passengers agree that this type of Desiro is not suited to suburban stopping services. However, the turnaround for this service is tight and the journey back lost no time.
At that time it would be against the peak flow so quieter.
 

setdown

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
329
It’s the same with the 444s on longer-distance work. A one-minute dwell at Basingstoke and Winchester in the evening peak services is fantasy-land.

It’s quite eye-opening how slow things can be. It can often be 30+ seconds between doors closing and the train starting to move. That adds up over a long distance journey. Elizabeth line feels like a different planet!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top