Sad Sprinter
Established Member
As a thought experiment, let's say the government chose BR's HS1 route into London, via Warwick Gardens into Waterloo/Kings Cross Low Level - how much of the route could realistically have been built and what would be the advantages and disadvantages we would see today over Arup's route?
My personal guess, is that the route to Kings Cross would be canned. From reading what others have said about the Low Level station in previous threads, it seems the station would have been impossible to build. I could see costs soaring throughout the 1990s, and the route just pruned back to WG leaving Waterloo as the sole terminus. Either that, or the route would be redesigned at a later stage - adding to the costs and leaving Waterloo as the terminus for a few years longer. Any ideas?
My personal guess, is that the route to Kings Cross would be canned. From reading what others have said about the Low Level station in previous threads, it seems the station would have been impossible to build. I could see costs soaring throughout the 1990s, and the route just pruned back to WG leaving Waterloo as the sole terminus. Either that, or the route would be redesigned at a later stage - adding to the costs and leaving Waterloo as the terminus for a few years longer. Any ideas?
