• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

UK Military discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.

GS250

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2019
Messages
1,031
In reality the only people who are probably justifiably concerned by what they're getting are the US Navy and US Air Force (the US Marines being happy with their Bs for the same reasons we would be, it's so much better than a Harrier). Pretty much everyone else who operated Harriers (or probably F-16s) who is getting some version of a F-35 is getting such a step up in capability it's not even funny.

As a replacement for the Tornado GR4s the A would only ever really be a compromise candidate and is again a reflection of reduced defence budgets. More properly the F-35 is probably closer to a Jaguar replacement than it is a Tornado. The UK probably actually needs three fast jets fleets. Typhoons for air defence with a bit of ground attack on the side, the F-35Bs for the Royal Navy and a modern Tornado like strike bomber for the RAF to deliver bombs and ground attack missiles where needed.

But we are where we are and just having more Typhoons and F-35Bs would go a long way to addressing the RAF and RN issues.

Yes...the F35 in any variant is extremely capable in spite of some of the nonsense being spewed elsewhere. Always better (if you have the opportunity) to speak to those involved with the running of such aircraft.

I guess another option for the RAF would have been the F15 EX of which is a true bomb truck.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top