flymo
Established Member
You're not the only one....btw your post makes me feel old!
You're not the only one....btw your post makes me feel old!
That is shocking dire !!

And looking at other photos on his flickr stream its so odd to see Sunderland station with natural light haha! I only remember it being brick wall with bird poo on, much like now really haha
As I am sure I've already said, the Metro service would be spot on if extra metro cars could have been built to coincide with the Sunderland extension.
Quite possibly. But the Metro extension was long overdue given that the people of Sunderland were contributing to the running and upkeep of a system on Tyneside.
If only they could have built it via Washington and had new builds of units and have an increased heavy rail service between Newcastle and Sunderland
That same old chestnut has been going around for years - there are other places on Tyneside which were and still are nowhere near a Metro station and still fund it. Plus Nexus did subsidise the Newcastle - Sunderland line and there are subsidised buses on Wearside.
However I agree it should have been in the original plan to have the Metro to run to at least Sunderland and Washington should have been another priority. Most of the problems with traffic on the A1 and over the Tyne can be explained by a lack of good rail links south of Gateshead.
Only way I think we'll see Metros running to places where a railway isn't already in existance is if Project Orpheus is brought back to life and tram-trains start running.
Jeez, that was a scary video...
I've always liked the T&W Metro. It's a bit like the Glasgow Subway; dinky little trains that do the job and nothing more. Although I like it out of interest, it really does deserve to get newer rolling stock, (from what I've heard) longer trains, and a whole new refresh. It doesn't seem to have changed at all since the '80s, and the area deserves a lot better.
Still, to all those who are moaning about it, consider yourselves lucky. So many cities up and down the UK have absolutely nothing like it. It makes a valuable contribution to the region as a whole and, even though it has its shortcomings, you're lucky to have it.
me123 said:Still, to all those who are moaning about it, consider yourselves lucky. So many cities up and down the UK have absolutely nothing like it. It makes a valuable contribution to the region as a whole and, even though it has its shortcomings, you're lucky to have it.
Jeez, that was a scary video...
I've always liked the T&W Metro. It's a bit like the Glasgow Subway; dinky little trains that do the job and nothing more. Although I like it out of interest, it really does deserve to get newer rolling stock, (from what I've heard) longer trains, and a whole new refresh. It doesn't seem to have changed at all since the '80s, and the area deserves a lot better.
I still wonder what our suburban network would have been like without the Metro.

I still wonder what our suburban network would have been like without the Metro. Maybe we could of had 333's on the North Tyneside loop and 321's off to Whitley Bay. maybe 156's on Whitley Bay to Dumfries and Glasgow Central, 142's on North Shields to Morpeth workings and loco hauled specials to Whitley Bay from all over the network
