Ashford is useless for getting to Calais. There are no trains at all that stop at both this year. I fully understand what you're saying economically and practically, but it does seem discriminatory towards those who can't or prefer not to drive or simply haven't got access to a motor vehicle. I.e. if you have the oldest, hardly roadworthy car or white van you have a huge panoply of competitive possibilities for getting your fags and booze back 'for personal consumption', but on foot it's a take it or leave it set of inferior options, yet all taking place at one of the busiest international borders in the world. It was much easier for local travellers to pop over in the days before the tunnel on foot. Can't see it getting any better in the future. There'll be no political will to incentivise easier cross border travel post Brexit I think. A potent symbol of how car culture is utterly embedded in society. Is the foot passenger service actually mandated in any way or could P&O unilaterally withdraw it if they wanted?There are no passengers wandering about the vast windswept docks. They are bussed from Terminal to Ferry and vice versa, no doubt at great cost.
They only offer foot passengers on a time span of day sailings which covers a P&O port shunt (terminal to boat) bus drivers and terminal staff shift. In my experience there are so few foot passengers [often less than 10 on a sailing] that even this service can't be economic. DFDS do not offer foot passenger service at all. Can't see any money to be made out of a bus service. One look at the coach prices for a tunnel transit ......
Both ports are set up for vehicle traffic, which is the overwhelming majority, and why wouldn't it be? There is so little demand for foot passengers. Passengers from East Kent can board a few Eurostars that stop at Ashford and again, from my observation, the current service is more than adequate for the number of passengers travelling.