harrythedog21
New Member
Hi all,
I'm new here so please excuse any formatting errors etc. I was hoping for some advice on an intent to prosecute letter I received as a result of avoiding my fare back in April.
I began working in London in March this year and started off by paying my fares every day I went in. I became annoyed with the amount it costs me to travel to and from London everyday and began to avoid paying my fare. I was caught by a revenue protector towards the end of March and was fined, which I paid immediately as I had no legs to stand on here. After this incident, I should have just began to pay my fare but or some reason, I decided a few weeks later to not pay my fare again and was caught by another revenue protector on 11/04/25.
A year before this, I had attended college in London, and was issued a notice by a revenue protector while accidentally sitting in the first class carriage of a Great Northern train (no seat markings to identify the fact it was a first class carriage). I was issued another fine by a man at the barriers as I had lost my ticket. I purchased a short ticket (less than I had paid that morning to get to London) and was unaware the time of purchase flags up when manually scanned. He issued me with a PCN but despite showing him my bank statement to prove I had paid for the ticket I had lost, he issued the fine anyway. I appealed both of these cases but had to pay the fines regardless. I had a response to the first one and they said it was still my fault (which was baffling to me as there were zero markings other than two 10cmx10cm squares with a 1 inside it to indicate a first class carriage) and the second one I received no response before the grace period was up and paid the full fine despite actually having a ticket. Both times here I had a physical ticket I purchased from the machines outside of the station.
I mention these cases because, the revenue protector said they operate on a three-strikes-and-you're-out policy. As this was my fourth time being caught, he said the court will be in touch and would like to hear my side of the story. This was back in April and just last week (08/08/25) I received a letter in the post with their intention to prosecute me. I have a few questions regarding this:
- After researching I learnt that you could contact the company directly (in this case Thameslink) and ask to settle out-of-court. I was not made aware of this, should I have contacted them before?
- As I never received an official response to my genuine loss of a ticket case, does this affect my case in any way? Like does the strike count if they never bothered to respond to my side of the story?
- Will they even refer to these past events? I'm not sure if the prosecution they refer to here is for my entire time I have been taking the train or just the one event on the 11th of April
- Overall, how screwed am I? Do you think they would want to settle out of court, or will they assume I'm a serial fare dodger due to my past history?
Sorry for the ramble, I am very anxious about this and it's been on my mind since April. I feel as though I should have acted sooner. I am genuinely remorseful for my actions and have paid every single train fare since this took place. I'm young and inexperienced in these types of things. I am thinking of hiring a solicitor to help with my response to the letter, do you think this is a good idea?
Anyway, any advice would be appreciated, thank you for your time.
I'm new here so please excuse any formatting errors etc. I was hoping for some advice on an intent to prosecute letter I received as a result of avoiding my fare back in April.
I began working in London in March this year and started off by paying my fares every day I went in. I became annoyed with the amount it costs me to travel to and from London everyday and began to avoid paying my fare. I was caught by a revenue protector towards the end of March and was fined, which I paid immediately as I had no legs to stand on here. After this incident, I should have just began to pay my fare but or some reason, I decided a few weeks later to not pay my fare again and was caught by another revenue protector on 11/04/25.
A year before this, I had attended college in London, and was issued a notice by a revenue protector while accidentally sitting in the first class carriage of a Great Northern train (no seat markings to identify the fact it was a first class carriage). I was issued another fine by a man at the barriers as I had lost my ticket. I purchased a short ticket (less than I had paid that morning to get to London) and was unaware the time of purchase flags up when manually scanned. He issued me with a PCN but despite showing him my bank statement to prove I had paid for the ticket I had lost, he issued the fine anyway. I appealed both of these cases but had to pay the fines regardless. I had a response to the first one and they said it was still my fault (which was baffling to me as there were zero markings other than two 10cmx10cm squares with a 1 inside it to indicate a first class carriage) and the second one I received no response before the grace period was up and paid the full fine despite actually having a ticket. Both times here I had a physical ticket I purchased from the machines outside of the station.
I mention these cases because, the revenue protector said they operate on a three-strikes-and-you're-out policy. As this was my fourth time being caught, he said the court will be in touch and would like to hear my side of the story. This was back in April and just last week (08/08/25) I received a letter in the post with their intention to prosecute me. I have a few questions regarding this:
- After researching I learnt that you could contact the company directly (in this case Thameslink) and ask to settle out-of-court. I was not made aware of this, should I have contacted them before?
- As I never received an official response to my genuine loss of a ticket case, does this affect my case in any way? Like does the strike count if they never bothered to respond to my side of the story?
- Will they even refer to these past events? I'm not sure if the prosecution they refer to here is for my entire time I have been taking the train or just the one event on the 11th of April
- Overall, how screwed am I? Do you think they would want to settle out of court, or will they assume I'm a serial fare dodger due to my past history?
Sorry for the ramble, I am very anxious about this and it's been on my mind since April. I feel as though I should have acted sooner. I am genuinely remorseful for my actions and have paid every single train fare since this took place. I'm young and inexperienced in these types of things. I am thinking of hiring a solicitor to help with my response to the letter, do you think this is a good idea?
Anyway, any advice would be appreciated, thank you for your time.