• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Surviving council owned bus companies in 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

jammy36

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2013
Messages
324
I see the local newspaper, the Advertiser, is running a story suggesting that SBC are looking to sell Thamesdown Transport. The paper is reporting the Go-Ahead group as being an interested suitor. May just be local paper speculation, local rags being perhaps best treated with caution, but nevertheless one to watch. Hopefully this won't be something that drags on and on, as I am sure such speculation must be unsettling for staff.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,759
Lancashire, Yorkshire, South Wales..... there were dozens of routes jointly operated by the municipals through to the late 1960s. I believe the Newport to Cardiff route is still jointly operated by their respective boroughs, as it has been for decades. With the arm's length arrangements now pertaining, councillors take a back seat anyway. Mayors, of course, are another matter, for those areas unfortunate enough to be governed by this undemocratic system.

Sorry, sloppy wording by myself. I meant actual merging of companies rather than joint working of services which is historic - including joint tram workings in the case of Accrington (Hyndburn), Haslingden and Rawtenstall (Rossendale). Nowadays, due to 'austerity' councils are sharing lots of services, including as high as chief officers but prior to 'austerity' it was generally a 'no go' topic in local government. You keep your own buses, bin lorries and everything in your own colours with your own council name on it. Shows what a good council you are delivering stuff for people. Clearly Burnley and Pendle merged at some point, as did Haslingden, Rawtenstall and Ramsbottom, back in 1968 I think, not sure how voluntary it was though.
 

kevjs

Member
Joined
4 Sep 2013
Messages
469
Sorry, sloppy wording by myself. I meant actual merging of companies rather than joint working of services which is historic - including joint tram workings in the case of Accrington (Hyndburn), Haslingden and Rawtenstall (Rossendale). Nowadays, due to 'austerity' councils are sharing lots of services, including as high as chief officers but prior to 'austerity' it was generally a 'no go' topic in local government. You keep your own buses, bin lorries and everything in your own colours with your own council name on it. Shows what a good council you are delivering stuff for people. Clearly Burnley and Pendle merged at some point, as did Haslingden, Rawtenstall and Ramsbottom, back in 1968 I think, not sure how voluntary it was though.

I don't quite understand how some of the mergers are supposed to work - Rushcliffe and Charnwood sharing Bin Lorries, yeah that makes sense (they are right next to one another in the East Midlands) - Nottinghamshire and Cornwall sharing road maintenance - eh?!
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,224
one of the great lost opportunities...........I've always wondered what would have happened if the Lancashire Municipal councils had got together and amalgamated their operations. Barrow, Lancaster, Preston, Blackpool, Fylde, Blackburn, Hyndburn, Rossendale (and did Burnley have a fleet?)
If operated as a coherent whole they could have seen off the predations by Stagecoach. Of course that would have required giving the town councillors brain transplants to achieve

Why would councillors need brain transplants? I've met many councillors. They all had brains.

A minority didn't always make full use of them.
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
4,193
Why would councillors need brain transplants? I've met many councillors. They all had brains.

A minority didn't always make full use of them.

In order to make decisions based on sense rather than politics and election results.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,224
In order to make decisions based on sense rather than politics and election results.

Well, if they ignore election results they won't be councillors for much longer! :)

And you'll never achieve agreement on what constitutes "sense" in this context.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Firstly that bus operators should not be entitled to compensation in areas where Bus Franchising is brought in as their operations are not being taken away from them and they are perfectly free to bid for the new franchises.

Is there a link for this?

TheGrandWazoo has always insisted that compensation would be required. His view is that the incumbent operators not only own vehicles and depots, but they also own "goodwill" and the right to trade. Implementation of franchising would remove this, and so the value of the business would be dramatically reduced.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
23,012
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Is there a link for this?

TheGrandWazoo has always insisted that compensation would be required. His view is that the incumbent operators not only own vehicles and depots, but they also own "goodwill" and the right to trade. Implementation of franchising would remove this, and so the value of the business would be dramatically reduced.

Just to correct you slightly - it was my opinion that it was wrong to embark on backdoor re-nationalisation without compensating businesses that had bought those firms in good faith.

The analogy that I used at the time was the selling off of council houses. People bought them at a discount and then resold them etc. Could you then simply take them off them but say it "it's ok - you might have the chance to rent it?"
 

317 forever

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Messages
3,290
Location
North West
I see the local newspaper, the Advertiser, is running a story suggesting that SBC are looking to sell Thamesdown Transport. The paper is reporting the Go-Ahead group as being an interested suitor. May just be local paper speculation, local rags being perhaps best treated with caution, but nevertheless one to watch. Hopefully this won't be something that drags on and on, as I am sure such speculation must be unsettling for staff.

I have seen a couple of references to this.
http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/...ouncil_looking_to_sell_Thamesdown_Transport_/
http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/news/15029042.Is_the_council_looking_to_sell_Thamesdown_Transport_/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top