Have you ever tried it? It's really comfortable. The breeze but still sung and warm.I'd ban those who wear sandals with socks
(not that SWMBO will let me)
Have you ever tried it? It's really comfortable. The breeze but still sung and warm.I'd ban those who wear sandals with socks
Have you ever tried it? It's really comfortable. The breeze but still sung and warm.
(not that SWMBO will let me)
As for footwear if I were supreme dictator of the universe, I'd ban those who wear sandals with socks.
Forgetting the reality of living in the year 2018 for a moment, noting that the thread title mentions trains, how do the Railway By-Laws address the matter raised in the title of the thread?
Has anyone got the answer to my query?
The railway byelaws are easily found online. Take a look and form your own answer/opinion.
Given your not inconsiderable command of the english language, the wording in the NRCoT would not present difficulty in comprehension of both the words used and their intended meaning. If there was a serious conflict between the generally accepted meaning and their intention, to the extent that those 'rules' were being frequently contravened, they will be/would have been modified or clarified as necessary.Noting the nuances inherent in some of the said railway byelaws, which not being imbued with to the same extent as a railway employee of some years standing, I asked my question hoping to receive a clear and concise response, but it appears that my hopes are dashed.
Haha hilarious. I can't help forming a picture in my mind.The Rodalies trains in Catalonia that link the resorts to Barcelona carry specific notices banning topless travel, presumably due to arrogant pigs from other countries not respecting the local Spanish customs . It's not the end of the world, but then nor is me, at 27 stone, travelling in only my underpants and slippers. I wouldn't do it out of common decency, would any of you?...
Blimey - I hope writing is not a part of your daily work!! At least you can understand PS aboveGiven your not inconsiderable command of the english language, the wording in the NRCoT would not present difficulty in comprehension of both the words used and their intended meaning. If there was a serious conflict between the generally accepted meaning and their intention, to the extent that those 'rules' were being frequently contravened, they will be/would have been modified or clarified as necessary.
Bear in mind that the type of person wanting to travel so attired might not even make reference to the conditions under which they have purchased their tickets, of if they did, they might interpret then in the way that best served their wishes.