• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

short fare yap

Status
Not open for further replies.

aperson

New Member
Joined
13 Sep 2025
Messages
1
Location
England
Today I was caught short faring partly because I stupidly admitted it, partly because it was inevitable. I was at the barriers and they scanned my ticket as there were rail staff doing checks instead of me scanning my barcode (this always works as my ticket is properly valid for travel just not the journey I make (I know)). I was told could not have got on from my originating station as it wasn’t validated. However the originating station on my ticket had no barriers and it could never have been scanned or “validated” I knew this but I was scared and I had never actually been to the originating station and was only 99% sure it didn’t have barriers and if the train service worker was asking why it wasn’t scanned at the originating station I assumed they knew I hadn’t scanned it there because there were definitely no barriers. Anyway I freaked out and admitted, she then cautioned me and interviewed me under oath I might have admitted some things. I knew and she stated that they were going to investigate my purchasing account anyway. Based on going through this forum the past 6 hrs, I was right in that assumption as it seems to be a matter of course. Anyway, my question is, does that really matter as I went back and checked and truly the originating station had no barriers. Would they truly serve me with an intent to prosecute as they cannot check, surely, if I had come from the originating station on cctv for all, if any, of the events in my history. I also portend that my confession was obtained under false pretences as the staff herself had no knowledge of the originating station if she was asking why it wasn’t scanned and there are no barriers. What are the chances of them succeeding in prosecuting this, would they really serve me a notice of intent to prosecute (I know they will).


More info, optional reading:
They regularly randomly have staff doing checks instead of letting the barriers work so that must be a hot route for short faring. Most times I go through these with no issue (which means some staff might know there’s no barriers at my presented originating station) on one occasion I was told to step aside and talk to an inspector, which is what happened today, that day the inspector claimed timings didn’t match which was not true bc I had the right ticket for my l journey in terms of arrival, but with the exact same line of questioning as today. I suppose she also thought something along the lines of it wasn’t scanned at originating station but didn’t get round to it or maybe other valid concerns. Anyway, I was let off on that occasion by the person that originally scanned my ticket after I had been arguing with the inspector and because I was late going somewhere & stressed my impatience. Today the lady wasn’t having it when I tried that and said they would investigate (bllshtting idk).
Anyway, I was tired of lying as I had gotten a penalty fare for the same thing
quite recently but simply because there was a check on the train before the stop of my short fare ticket and I obviously could not show a valid ticket. Which is when I found out you can’t buy a correct fare ticket on a train funny enough (even in good faith) it’s a crime to not have one on hand. Bla bla seems wishy-washy what UK countries and services you can buy a valid ticket on after boarding, but like I said after poring through these pages I realise it’s definitely overall a crime. I paid that on the spot, didn’t even have info taken. That should’ve been my big warning and lesson and lucky break I guess but greed and poverty are a terrible mix.
Anyway, it was inevitable, I travel that route too regularly the chances were so slim of me not being one day caught in some shape or form, just a matter of how and when. Honestly with the PF being quite recent and today being questioned I knew the jig had to be up some time and was secretly relieved and maybe even glad to restitute. It’s also the big scary enough wake up call I clearly needed. I’m not good at lying and stealing is not comfortable after you’ve been semi caught once.

Altogether, I got away with this with train staff thrice, one occasion I already mentioned and then once, the first time and in the early days. I presented my short ticket (I learnt the word for it today) on the train just as it pulled out of the “originating station” and the staff confronted me as they had “apparently” witnessed me being on the train longer. I kept mute in terrified shame and didn’t answer any questions & nothing came of it. She did scan the ticket & I suspect that even if I heard nothing of it I might have been flagged in some way. The ticket after all has all my information and the ticket seller could divulge more. But I never heard a word, I was quite confident in keeping mute because it was my word against hers and there was no proof of my being on the train prior as accused as the train had left the station. Except common sense and her eyes.

The third time, a staff scanned my ticket on the train I was well in the safe zone btw originating and final destination. My ticket was scanned with no incident. Which leads me back to the fact that some staff must know there are no barriers to scan/validate any ticket at the “originating” station. I do not think I got away with it per se as there was no incident and per my reasoning, then,I had done nothing “wrong” on the train. As I also mentioned I got through manual barrier checks this way on a few occasions.

I know the biggest possibility is that I will be issued a NIP and I will settle. I am financially prepared, I think, to do this. As I say it was all inevitable, it is a slap of a wake up call and I had not done it for *terribly* long. Also lying & stealing takes its toll (I know, poor innocent me). Obviously, never doing this again, well and truly learnt my lesson & the recent PF was enough of the kick, I mended my ways for a short while but poverty. Now I will be even poorer and I’m even more scared and ashamed so penny wise, too many pounds & emotions foolish. I will not hap on about my career and potential damage, I plan to pay out. I don’t need anyone on their moral high horse offering snarky comments and judgements, I know it all and have admitted it all. Nobody needn’t reply. I just want to clarify what I said in the beginning, isn’t it ridiculous that train staff don’t know which routes have barriers and would I have surely gotten away with this on this occasion if I hadn’t confessed pre & post caution. The basis of the inspector’s initial line of inquiry was moot. Like I said this was not even the desired outcome, I would’ve been caught out in another way sooner or later, just pure stats. This way I can save up for hefty fine and settle into appropriate tfare induced poverty for the rest of the month.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,370
Location
LBK
Today I was caught short faring partly because I stupidly admitted it, partly because it was inevitable. I was at the barriers and they scanned my ticket as there were rail staff doing checks instead of me scanning my barcode (this always works as my ticket is properly valid for travel just not the journey I make (I know)). I was told could not have got on from my originating station as it wasn’t validated. However the originating station on my ticket had no barriers
Where have you been travelling from and to, and which two stations is your ticket valid between?

and it could never have been scanned or “validated” I knew this but I was scared and I had never actually been to the originating station and was only 99% sure it didn’t have barriers and if the train service worker was asking why it wasn’t scanned at the originating station I assumed they knew I hadn’t scanned it there because there were definitely no barriers. Anyway I freaked out and admitted, she then cautioned me and interviewed me under oath I might have admitted some things. I knew and she stated that they were going to investigate my purchasing account anyway. Based on going through this forum the past 6 hrs, I was right in that assumption as it seems to be a matter of course. Anyway, my question is, does that really matter as I went back and checked and truly the originating station had no barriers.
Your question is "I admitted to committing offences I committed. They couldn't have caught me out any other way, is my confession evidence?" Yes, and particularly so because they obtained it under caution. You were told that you do not have to say anything and anything you do say may be given in evidence (that is, given to a court as evidence of your guilt). You have freely provided them with the evidence of your wrongdoing.

Would they truly serve me with an intent to prosecute as they cannot check, surely, if I had come from the originating station on cctv for all, if any, of the events in my history.
Yes. You admitted the offence. They also have your details. Do you live by the station you've been short faring from? To retract your confession you'll have to tell lies, and nobody here is going to advise you to do that.

I also portend that my confession was obtained under false pretences as the staff herself had no knowledge of the originating station if she was asking why it wasn’t scanned and there are no barriers.
That isn't what false pretences (or portend! you mean contend) means. They caught you out and they know what you've been up to.

What are the chances of them succeeding in prosecuting this, would they really serve me a notice of intent to prosecute (I know they will).
Yes. You admitted the offence.

I know the biggest possibility is that I will be issued a NIP and I will settle. I am financially prepared, I think, to do this.
Which train company is involved? Most of them will investigate your ticket purchasing accounts to recover historic fare evasion; how many times have you short fared?
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
2,435
Anyway, my question is, does that really matter as I went back and checked and truly the originating station had no barriers. Would they truly serve me with an intent to prosecute as they cannot check, surely, if I had come from the originating station on cctv for all, if any, of the events in my history. I also portend that my confession was obtained under false pretences as the staff herself had no knowledge of the originating station if she was asking why it wasn’t scanned and there are no barriers
Do you know for certain that there wasn't also staff at that station checking all tickets on that day?

Not that it makes much difference mind, as you confessed to the offence when it was put to you, but probably wise going forwards to remember that they might know more than you think.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,756
Location
West of Andover
Do you know for certain that there wasn't also staff at that station checking all tickets on that day?

Not that it makes much difference mind, as you confessed to the offence when it was put to you, but probably wise going forwards to remember that they might know more than you think.
Agreed, some routes which are a hotbed for short farers will sometimes have revenue staff at the unstaffed/unbarriered station solely to validate any genuine customers from that station

Anybody trying to use a ticket from that station which hasn't been scanned will be assumed to be short faring unless they are split ticketing (and just happens to have deleted/binned their ticket used from A to 'B')
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,745
Location
Gwynedd
Today I was caught short faring partly because I stupidly admitted it, partly because it was inevitable. I was at the barriers and they scanned my ticket as there were rail staff doing checks instead of me scanning my barcode (this always works as my ticket is properly valid for travel just not the journey I make (I know)). I was told could not have got on from my originating station as it wasn’t validated. However the originating station on my ticket had no barriers and it could never have been scanned or “validated” I knew this but I was scared and I had never actually been to the originating station and was only 99% sure it didn’t have barriers and if the train service worker was asking why it wasn’t scanned at the originating station I assumed they knew I hadn’t scanned it there because there were definitely no barriers.
Just because there are no barriers, doesn't mean there weren't any scanners there that day. If revenue protection were replacing the barriers at your destination, there a non-insignificant chance that they had also positioned revenue protection at your supposed origin station with mobile scanners.

It's irrelevant though given you admitted short faring.
Anyway I freaked out and admitted, she then cautioned me and interviewed me under oath I might have admitted some things. I knew and she stated that they were going to investigate my purchasing account anyway. Based on going through this forum the past 6 hrs, I was right in that assumption as it seems to be a matter of course.
It's likely, though not guaranteed.
Anyway, my question is, does that really matter as I went back and checked and truly the originating station had no barriers. Would they truly serve me with an intent to prosecute as they cannot check, surely, if I had come from the originating station on cctv for all, if any, of the events in my history.
No, it's irrelevant. You've made an admission of short-faring. Whether the staff were correct about the origin station have ticket scanning operations that day (whether barriers or staff scanning) is not relevant.

If you're asking if you could get away with saying the statement you made was false and you did actually travel from that origin station that day, nobody here is going to advocate for that. It's lying, which is unethical, and it's only going to count against you in attempting to negotiate some out of court settlement. The train company will just say ok see you in court and you can present your case there, and they'll have a bunch of evidence, including your statements under oath.
I also portend that my confession was obtained under false pretences as the staff herself had no knowledge of the originating station if she was asking why it wasn’t scanned and there are no barriers. What are the chances of them succeeding in prosecuting this, would they really serve me a notice of intent to prosecute (I know they will).
As mentioned, you don't actually know there was no scanning operation there at that time of that day. Also you've already admitted it, so even if the staff member was mistaken, it's immaterial to your guilt.

If they take it to court I'd say the chance of a guilty conviction would be high. You could employ a specialist solicitor who has expertise in this area, but you'd likely need a better defence than this. The solicitor will also cost you a fair whack so might not be any better than an out of court settlement.
More info, optional reading:
They regularly randomly have staff doing checks instead of letting the barriers work so that must be a hot route for short faring.
Which probably is a hint that they may occasionally position revenue protection at stations they suspect will be the origins of short faring, even though there's no barriers.
Most times I go through these with no issue (which means some staff might know there’s no barriers at my presented originating station) on one occasion I was told to step aside and talk to an inspector, which is what happened today, that day the inspector claimed timings didn’t match which was not true bc I had the right ticket for my l journey in terms of arrival, but with the exact same line of questioning as today.
I mean that depends what you told them about what time you boarded the train at the 'origin' station. I expect even experienced fare evaders make mistakes and give the wrong departure times on their short fares.
I suppose she also thought something along the lines of it wasn’t scanned at originating station but didn’t get round to it or maybe other valid concerns. Anyway, I was let off on that occasion by the person that originally scanned my ticket after I had been arguing with the inspector and because I was late going somewhere & stressed my impatience. Today the lady wasn’t having it when I tried that and said they would investigate (bllshtting idk).
If you've been encountering these staff members regularly enough on short fares, there's a chance you've actually become a recognisable face to be honest. The lies might work once or twice but revenue protection teams aren't stupid. If they see the same short fares coming up times after time, and if they eventually begin to recognise your face as one they see coming up with a warning on their scanner, they're going to take more of an interest.

The time you got pulled aside for questioning then reluctantly let go should've been your wake-up call to stop doing this. You were indirectly warned of the potential consequences, now they're here.
Anyway, I was tired of lying as I had gotten a penalty fare for the same thing
quite recently but simply because there was a check on the train before the stop of my short fare ticket and I obviously could not show a valid ticket.
I stand corrected, you have two warnings of the potential consequences.
Which is when I found out you can’t buy a correct fare ticket on a train funny enough (even in good faith) it’s a crime to not have one on hand. Bla bla seems wishy-washy what UK countries and services you can buy a valid ticket on after boarding, but like I said after poring through these pages I realise it’s definitely overall a crime.
It's not wishy-washy. Where ticket facilities are available at your origin station, you need to buy a ticket before boarding. I don't want to just berate you, but if you try this language on in your appeal for an out of court settlement for multiple fare evasions made even after you received a penalty fare and and interrogation from revenue protection staff on separate occasions, you're not going to get any brownie points from the train company.
Anyway, it was inevitable, I travel that route too regularly the chances were so slim of me not being one day caught in some shape or form, just a matter of how and when. Honestly with the PF being quite recent and today being questioned I knew the jig had to be up some time and was secretly relieved and maybe even glad to restitute. It’s also the big scary enough wake up call I clearly needed. I’m not good at lying and stealing is not comfortable after you’ve been semi caught once.
Caught once, semi-caught a second time.
Altogether, I got away with this with train staff thrice, one occasion I already mentioned and then once, the first time and in the early days. I presented my short ticket (I learnt the word for it today) on the train just as it pulled out of the “originating station” and the staff confronted me as they had “apparently” witnessed me being on the train longer. I kept mute in terrified shame and didn’t answer any questions & nothing came of it. She did scan the ticket & I suspect that even if I heard nothing of it I might have been flagged in some way. The ticket after all has all my information and the ticket seller could divulge more. But I never heard a word, I was quite confident in keeping mute because it was my word against hers and there was no proof of my being on the train prior as accused as the train had left the station. Except common sense and her eyes.

The third time, a staff scanned my ticket on the train I was well in the safe zone btw originating and final destination. My ticket was scanned with no incident. Which leads me back to the fact that some staff must know there are no barriers to scan/validate any ticket at the “originating” station. I do not think I got away with it per se as there was no incident and per my reasoning, then,I had done nothing “wrong” on the train. As I also mentioned I got through manual barrier checks this way on a few occasions.
Honestly, drop this argument about the barriers.

Also if the train company asks you about any of these previous events, you'll need to answer honestly and with contrition. Don't proactively offer information about past events, but if asked, you can't be saying that you didn't do anything "wrong" when you and the train company know you did. It's not a great position to be in but it's potentially salvageable if you're just honest, apologetic, and promise to change your ways, rather than getting into technicalities of whether there were barriers at the station or staff not being able to prove you were on the train for longer than you said.
I know the biggest possibility is that I will be issued a NIP and I will settle.
The biggest possibility is that you are taken to court and found guilty. An out of court settlement is not guaranteed. To secure one you need to make an offer to do so to the train company, cooperate with their investigation, answer their questions truthfully and without personal opinions on their revenue protection policies, and assure them you won't do it again, and ultimately hope they accept.
I am financially prepared, I think, to do this. As I say it was all inevitable, it is a slap of a wake up call and I had not done it for *terribly* long. Also lying & stealing takes its toll (I know, poor innocent me). Obviously, never doing this again, well and truly learnt my lesson & the recent PF was enough of the kick, I mended my ways for a short while but poverty. Now I will be even poorer and I’m even more scared and ashamed so penny wise, too many pounds & emotions foolish. I will not hap on about my career and potential damage, I plan to pay out. I don’t need anyone on their moral high horse offering snarky comments and judgements, I know it all and have admitted it all.
That's understandable, and people aren't here primarily to judge, though sometimes the language may appear harsh in an attempt to get reality to hit. Hopefully you negotiate an out of court settlement and find a way to pay.
Nobody needn’t reply. I just want to clarify what I said in the beginning, isn’t it ridiculous that train staff don’t know which routes have barriers and would I have surely gotten away with this on this occasion if I hadn’t confessed pre & post caution. The basis of the inspector’s initial line of inquiry was moot.
This is one of those instances where the language may appear harsh - do not word your communications to the train company in this way. It comes across that you feel like you've been tricked or hard done by, when in reality you've not. You've been regularly evading fares and are upset that you've been outsmarted. You also, just to reiterate, don't know that they didn't have revenue protection staff at the 'origin' station which had no barriers, scanning tickets, so even if it were a defence (it's not), it might not be true.
Like I said this was not even the desired outcome, I would’ve been caught out in another way sooner or later, just pure stats. This way I can save up for hefty fine and settle into appropriate tfare induced poverty for the rest of the month.
Indeed, and if they do investigate the travel history and charge you the full fare plus admin fees, it may be worth bearing in mind for the future that it would've been cheaper to buy the correct fare rather than pay the penalty fares and settlement admin fees.

Assuming you hear back from the train company, post redacted versions of the communications here for advice. Most operators are open to out of court settlements but you need to be careful Inn your replies to them, both to get the tone right and the message across, and also to avoid incriminating yourself with details of events they haven't mentioned to you.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,611
. I also portend that my confession was obtained under false pretences as the staff herself had no knowledge of the originating station if she was asking why it wasn’t scanned and there are no barriers.
Whether you have been caught out by the incorrect knowledge of that staff member or by there having been revenue protection staff at the relevant unbarriered station on that day is neither here nor there. The fact is that you were caught out and admitted to what you were doing. That will be enough for a prosecution to succeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top