• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ScotRail 334: why built with both 2+2 and 2+3 seating?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jamesontheroad

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2009
Messages
2,242
Location
Umeå, Sweden
Being a regular if erratic commuter on the Ayr line, I've got into the habit of sitting in the same carriage of the same departure on most trips. This lead me to wonder, why was the 334 built with leading carriages of 2+2 seating and a centre carriage of 3+2 seating? Why not one or the other throughout the whole train?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

CarterUSM

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2010
Messages
2,495
Location
North Britain
I'd hazard a guess that due to the amount of space the toilet takes up, they tried to re-coup the seating loss a bit. 334's just don't seem to be as roomy as the 318's though, much preferred working on those.
 

RPM

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2009
Messages
1,531
Location
Buckinghamshire
The Chiltern 165 have been like that since they were refurbished. The reason for doing it was that passenger opinion was divided over which seating arrangement was best. Perhaps Scotrail did it for the same reason?
 

A60K

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2008
Messages
1,030
Location
Kilburn
Same with some of the 377s. Perhaps it's so that Third Class can be reintroduced :)
 

rail-britain

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2007
Messages
4,102
I assumed this 2+2 was for "priority seating" next to the doors, in order to meet DiPTAC requirements
I've always sat in the 2+2 seating
 

The_Stig

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
364
Yeah the extra 8 seats or so per unit seems weird since not many people use them!

I can only guess that CarterUSM is correct and they tried to re-coup the lost seats.
 

Bittern

Established Member
Joined
8 Apr 2009
Messages
1,919
Location
Scotland
I prefer the ones that have the arm rests.

Alright, honestly, what does all this 3+2 and 2+2 stuff actually mean?
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,803
Location
Central Belt
Same with some of the 377s. Perhaps it's so that Third Class can be reintroduced :)

Not so simple as they would need another universal toilet. You need one per class. I understand the plan was to have a cattle class on the voyager hence why the have 3 large toilets. Virgin dropped the idea but too late to change the unit body design.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top