• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

North Sea tanker collision

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,944
Location
Up the creek
Aviation benefits from having seen the nonsense that the maritime industry had got up to in the years since Noah was a lad, and the authorities deciding they wouldn't put up with it. There's still some of it around, but it's much more tightly regulated.

And also because a high proportion of maritime disasters occur out at sea and out of mind, and the majority only involve seamen. Planes can land on anyone’s head and are far more likely to contain members of the general public.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mpthomson

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
1,378
However it's totally unsurprising that the master of a vessel that has T-boned an anchored vessel in daylight should carry the responsibility whether on the bridge or not.

Obviously we'll have to wait to hear exactly how this happened. It may, or may not, be telling what were the duties of the missing crew member.
Indeed
 

AndyPJG

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
543

Ship captain charged over North Sea collision​

BBC News
The captain of a cargo ship that collided with an oil tanker in the North Sea has been charged with gross negligence manslaughter.
Vladimir Motin, 59, of Primorsky, St Petersburg, Russia, has been remanded in police custody to appear at Hull Magistrates Court on Saturday, Humberside Police said.
The Portuguese-flagged Solong and US-registered tanker Stena Immaculate crashed off the East Yorkshire coast at about 10:00 GMT on Monday.
Filipino national Mark Angelo Pernia, 38, has been named as the crew member of the Solong who is missing and presumed dead, the Crown Prosecution Service said.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,445
Location
Sheffield
We now know that Filipino national Mark Angelo Pernia, 38, died, his role is not given.

https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/cps...charge-following-fatal-north-sea-vessel-crash

CPS authorises gross negligence manslaughter charge following fatal North Sea vessel crash​

14 March 2025|News

Frank Ferguson, Head of the Crown Prosecution Service Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division, said: “We have authorised Humberside Police to charge a Russian national in relation to a collision involving two vessels in the North Sea off the east coast of England.
“The Portuguese-registered cargo ship, the Solong, collided with the American-registered oil tanker, the Stena Immaculate, just before 10am on Monday, 10 March 2025.
“Filipino national Mark Angelo Pernia, 38, died.
“Vladimir Motin, 59, from St Petersburg, Russia, who was the vessel’s captain, is due to be charged with one count of gross negligence manslaughter.
“The Crown Prosecution Service reminds all concerned that criminal proceedings against this defendant are now active and that he has the right to a fair trial.
“It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.”
Mr Motin will appear at Hull Magistrates’ Court on Saturday, 15 March.

Notes to editors​

  • Vladimir Motin, [DOB: 18/02/1966], is from St Petersburg, Russia.
  • He is charged with gross negligence manslaughter.
  • The CPS Special Crime Division deals with some of the most complex and sensitive cases in England and Wales including disasters, serious criminal allegations against police officers, corporate manslaughter and election offences.
 

Lewisham2221

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2005
Messages
2,750
Location
Staffordshire
Yes, an 'anchor watch' is required, which includes a constant lookout.


I have not been able to find any informed discussion of events on the bridge of the tanker. It is operated by the US government. They may prefer it that way.

MAIG interim report published: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/solong-and-stena-immaculate-interim-report-published

Generally just confirms what we already know, but to note:
At 0700, Solong’s master returned to the bridge and took over the watch as the lone watchkeeper.

The BBC is reporting that
"Neither Solong nor Stena Immaculate had a dedicated lookout on the bridge."
I'm not particularly well versed on maritime procedures and terminology, so it could well be that that isn't anywhere near as concerning as it sounds, but I'll leave that up to those more knowledgeable in the field to clarify.

Source:
BBC News - Ships had no lookouts before crash, says report
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,608
Location
Nottingham
I'm not particularly well versed on maritime procedures and terminology, so it could well be that that isn't anywhere near as concerning as it sounds, but I'll leave that up to those more knowledgeable in the field to clarify.
In the case of the Solong I think it could be a problem. Various previous MAIB reports have criticised the practice of sailing overnight with only one person on the bridge. I'm not sure whether that also applies to anchor watches.
 

Indigo Soup

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2018
Messages
1,485
I'm not particularly well versed on maritime procedures and terminology, so it could well be that that isn't anywhere near as concerning as it sounds, but I'll leave that up to those more knowledgeable in the field to clarify.
This is one of those areas where there's a big difference between 'industry standard practice' and 'safe practice'.

Many shipping companies endeavour to keep crewing costs as low as possible without incurring excessive fines for violating legal requirements - which may or may not entail actually complying with them. Any relationship of either to safe practice may be entirely accidental, at least at the highly cutthroat end of the market. It's well known that short-sea trading ships are basically powered by sleep deprivation.
In the case of the Solong I think it could be a problem. Various previous MAIB reports have criticised the practice of sailing overnight with only one person on the bridge. I'm not sure whether that also applies to anchor watches.
They've criticised a lack of adequate anchor watches in the past. I don't think they've ever published a report into a collision between two ships where there wasn't some shortcoming found on both.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,445
Location
Sheffield
Post 67 previously linked the MAIB Interim report into this accident that occurred at 9.47 on 10th March 2025, see; https://assets.publishing.service.g...ff1a/Solong-StenaImmaculate-InterimReport.pdf

The Captain of the Solong was charged with gross negligence manslaughter and was sentenced last week to 6 years in jail, see BBC report; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yv1d7g2ldo

Silence and inaction - how audio helped prove captain guilty of North Sea tanker crash​

Smoke billows from a rust-coloured tanker ship floating in the sea. A tugboat floats nearby.
Image source, PA Media
Image caption,
The Solong billows smoke following the crash in March 2025
ByJosh Martin and Simon Browning, Business reporters
    • Published
      5 February 2026
The 30 minutes of inaction from a cargo ship captain in the lead-up to a fiery North Sea tanker crash and his "striking" silence in the aftermath made it clear to police he was at fault, the chief investigator has said.
The jury saw two very different reactions to the collision when they were shown footage from the Stena Immaculate, the ship that was anchored 14 nautical miles off the Humber estuary, and footage from the Solong, the cargo ship captained by Vladimir Motin that ploughed into it, Detective Chief Superintendent Craig Nicholson said.
The force of the collision created a huge fireball and blazes on both ships, but the Humberside Police chief superintendent told the BBC it was "really, really telling" that audio from the bridge of the Solong suggested "63 seconds post-collision of abstract silence".
Motin, on Thursday, was sentenced to a six-year prison term for gross negligence manslaughter.

p0mv1cpn.jpg
01:26
Media caption,
Watch: Moment cargo ship crashes into oil tanker in North Sea

'Just silence' on the Solong​

Nicholson described audio from the Solong's bridge, where Motin was stationed as "just silence...with some background noises that could be muffling, or it could be the wind" in the lead-up to and in the immediate aftermath of the collision.
On the Stena Immaculate, the audio was very different.
Video footage showed a fireball erupting after the Stena Immaculate's hull is ripped open by the Solong and its cargo of jet fuel ignited by the force. Audio from the bridge tallies with the chaotic scenes.
"You hear the collision and then immediately you have an unfiltered human reaction. One of the crew swears," the policeman said.
"And then immediately... the alarms are sounded, they're talking about what's happened. They're starting the fire pumps, they're doing everything you would expect them to do."
Nicholson said audio recording played in court showed the Stena Immaculate's captain was "immediately concerned about his crew, getting his crew to the muster station and making sure his crew is safe".
During this same time audio from the bridge of the Solong told the court there were some footsteps and then a voice on the radio.
"When you overlay those two things, it's striking."
Detective Chief Superintendent Craig Nicholson wears a dark suit and tie while sitting in front of a window.

Image caption,
Detective Chief Superintendent Craig Nicholson

Changing accounts from the captain​

In its investigation following the 10 March 2025 collision, Humberside Police questioned Motin multiple times to try and account for the inaction on the bridge.
"Vladimir Motin's account has evolved over time. his initial account, when he's spoken to prior to his arrest, is quite vague," Nicholson said.
In subsequent hours-long interviews after Motin's arrest, Nicholson said the Solong captain still couldn't account for the silences or lack of response to the unfolding disaster.
"He couldn't explain or wouldn't explain what he was doing," the detective said.
Motin also couldn't explain why other safety tools at his disposal, such as radar and electronic systems, weren't used and a crew notification system was turned off, "all of which would have helped to identify that risk and prevented a collision," Nicholson said.
As the case proceeded through the justice system and the Solong captain saw and heard all of the evidence in the months prior to court, the Humberside detective said a new account was "constructed to suit the evidence, but still makes very little sense".
Nicholson summed it up: "I don't believe Vladimir Motin's ever given a truthful account about the events.
"His account has changed throughout the course of the investigation and throughout the course of the criminal trial."
A mugshot of a middle aged man with glasses, brown hair and a checked blue shirt
Image source, Reuters/Humberside Police
Image caption,
Russian national Vladimir Motin did not try and steer the Solong away from the Stena Immaculate until it was one miles away from the 173m oil tanker

A crucial 30 minutes​

In the trial, Motin's defence lawyer argued that his client, although at fault for the crash that left a crewman presumed dead, his actions did not reach the bar for gross negligence manslaughter.
Defence barrister James Leonard KC argued that "human error" did not amount to gross negligence.
Motin, the defence argued, had tried to alter the path of the Solong so that it would avoid the Stena Immaculate, but the automatic controls were faulty and wouldn't disengage.
After the Solong was one nautical mile away from the Stena Immaculate, Leonard told the jury Motin was "utterly convinced he's got manual control", but "that is the big mistake, he has pressed the wrong button."
The defence lawyer said even an emergency stop at that point in time would not have stopped a crash and could have even impacted the Stena Immaculate's accommodation area, putting more lives at risk.
Nicholson and the prosecution said they didn't believe there was any mechanical failing to blame, and called the auto-pilot story "ludicrous", but even if there was a steering fault Motin never contacted ship engineers to report an issue.
"He could have firstly called an engineer or called for assistance, but the obvious thing to do would have been to slow the vessel down," he said.
And the detective told the BBC that corrective action could have been taken by Motin well before that point, because the Stena Immaculate wasn't moving.
"You have a large ship at anchor [the Stena Immaculate]...around about 170 metres in length. It's been at anchor for over eight hours. It's visible on radar," he said.
"You then have Captain Motin who acknowledges that he sees that vessel on his radar. At the very least he sees it at 9 miles.
"He knows it's on a collision course, but he doesn't alter his heading and he doesn't alter his speed...at 3 miles he says he can see the vessel out of his window, but he still doesn't take any action whatsoever."
Nicholson said at the very least, Motin "should have sounded an alarm" to his crew and to the Stena Immaculate.
"That would have prevented the death of Mark Pernia, who was in the bow of the vessel at the point of collision," he said.
Mark Pernia, 38, was a Philippine national working on the Solong and last seen on the ship's bow. The court heard how the strength of the fire from the collision hampered the search for him in the immediate aftermath.
He is missing, presumed dead.
The detective said the conviction should help give closure to Pernia's wife and two young daughters, and that the presumed death of the crewman was a crucial element of getting a conviction over the collision.
"Mark Pernia is the investigation. Our entire investigation revolves around Mark Pernia and Mark Pernia's death," Nicholson said.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I note that the vessel changed course as it passed the Farne Islands, from the MAIB report;

Solong passed the Longstone Lighthouse off the north-east coast of England and altered course onto a heading of approximately 150°. Solong maintained this course except for a slight deviation at 0345. At 0700, Solong’s master returned to the bridge and took over the watch as the lone watchkeeper. The visibility in the area north of the Humber light float was reported to be patchy and varying between 0.25 nautical miles (nm) and 2.0nm. Neither Solong nor Stena Immaculate had a dedicated lookout on the bridge. At 0947, Solong collided with the anchored Stena Immaculate’s port side on a heading (HDG) of 150° and speed over the ground (SOG) of about 16 knots (kts)

At first I thought Russian captain Motin might have planned to hit the American tanker amidships. If he did his aim was amazingly accurate from that distance.

Alone on the bridge.

Poor visibility but radar functioning.

Auto pilot engaged but warning turned off

Experienced officer and used to the coast so should be aware of ships likely to be anchored around mouth of Humber and vessels moving in and out.

Didn't sound a warning

Didn't alert his own crew

If he'd held that heading he'd have run aground off Norfolk and probably taken a few wind turbines with him!
 
Last edited:

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,594
Location
Croydon
Post 67 previously linked the MAIB Interim report into this accident that occurred at 9.47 on 10th March 2025, see; https://assets.publishing.service.g...ff1a/Solong-StenaImmaculate-InterimReport.pdf

The Captain of the Solong was charged with gross negligence manslaughter and was sentenced last week to 6 years in jail, see BBC report; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yv1d7g2ldo



== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I note that the vessel changed course as it passed the Farne Islands, from the MAIB report;



At first I thought Russian captain Motin might have planned to hit the American tanker amidships. If he did his aim was amazingly accurate from that distance.

Alone on the bridge.

Poor visibility but radar functioning.

Auto pilot engaged but warning turned off

Experienced officer and used to the coast so should be aware of ships likely to be anchored around mouth of Humber and vessels moving in and out.

Didn't sound a warning

Didn't alert his own crew

If he'd held that heading he'd have run aground off Norfolk and probably taken a few wind turbines with him!
Thanks for this.

Well it looks like the captain, and crew, of the Solong was caught napping.
Or worse still it was possibly deliberate as you added overnight !.
 

EYFanatic

Member
Joined
29 Sep 2025
Messages
629
Location
Hell's Dungeon
Whilst I do not have a personal connection to the incident, this whole thing sticks with me and will do until my dying day as I was passing through the area the day after the collision when they thought the missing sailor might still be found. The ferry I was on, the DFDS ship King Seaways, stood really close in and passengers were asked to line both port and starboard outer decks to look out for any flashing light from the lifejacket... Sadly we know that never happened. I thought it was a long shot, but as a sailor - even though just a coastal and inland one - I wasn't going to ignore a brother sailor

Captain Motin deserves to rot in the deepest, darkest depths of the hottest hells. How on earth he only got 6 years, of which hes due out in 4 on license minus the 11 months he was on remand, I will never know and I've got half a mind to make a private application for a sentencing review. My thoughts now, as they were at the time, remain with AB Pernia's family and loved ones
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,608
Location
Nottingham
Thanks for this.

Well it looks like the captain, and crew, of the Solong was caught napping.
Or worse still it was possibly deliberate as you added overnight !.
I suggest just the captain. He was the only one keeping a lookout (or rather not doing so) and had full control of the vessel. One of the crew was killed.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,594
Location
Croydon
I suggest just the captain. He was the only one keeping a lookout (or rather not doing so) and had full control of the vessel. One of the crew was killed.
Yes, I did not mean to blame the crew.
I am fairly ignorant but would the rest of the crew have even been aware only one person was in control and is that normal ?.
(I guess in the middle of nowhere yes normal, but in the North sea heading South ?).
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,608
Location
Nottingham
Yes, I did not mean to blame the crew.
I am fairly ignorant but would the rest of the crew have even been aware only one person was in control and is that normal ?.
(I guess in the middle of nowhere yes normal, but in the North sea heading South ?).
I read most of the MAIB reports and it's common to see mention of no second person to act as a lookout. That's a self-selecting sample of course (ships with extra lookouts may avoid accidents and hence not appear in MAIB reports) but I would guess it's pretty common practice and the crew would have been aware. But unless the safety culture is very good, it's difficult to challenge the captain even if they'd wanted to.
 

EYFanatic

Member
Joined
29 Sep 2025
Messages
629
Location
Hell's Dungeon
Yes, I did not mean to blame the crew.
I am fairly ignorant but would the rest of the crew have even been aware only one person was in control and is that normal ?.
(I guess in the middle of nowhere yes normal, but in the North sea heading South ?).
With a small crew as the Solong had, its not unusual to have a single watch keeper and i certainly know of this happening on coastals and smaller container ships. Normally, though, the custom is when passing through a heavily trafficked area or when visibility is poor to have a second person with glasses to double check the radar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top