• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Defence Pact between the UK, USA and Australia

Status
Not open for further replies.

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,439
Location
Yorks
If you are not safe unless the country you live in has nuclear submarines, what are people in small countries (which could never hope to afford a nuclear submarine) supposed to do?

Form an alliance with someone who has some.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,139
Location
Redcar
But if you get your own, that means you think that alliances don't work.
I'm not quite sure how that follows? Surely it's a good thing if your part of an alliance and a smaller member decides to contribute more to their own defence meaning that the whole alliance is strengthened?
 

johncrossley

Established Member
Joined
30 Mar 2021
Messages
4,474
Location
London
I'm not quite sure how that follows? Surely it's a good thing if your part of an alliance and a smaller member decides to contribute more to their own defence meaning that the whole alliance is strengthened?

But I'm sure Australia could remain safe without it. Similarly if Luxembourg and New Zealand decide not to have their own subs.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,439
Location
Yorks
But I'm sure Australia could remain safe without it. Similarly if Luxembourg and New Zealand decide not to have their own subs.

Well, if you do decide you need that capability in one way or another, the more countries in the alliance that have it, the better.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,960
Location
Fenny Stratford
An interesting point is that there is a two way trade between the UK and USA on submarine technology. I wonder if we were invited into this deal in order to continue that?
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,692
Location
Solihull
The Astute platform (or a development of) is probably more suitable for a smaller navy than US designs so it might be our sub design but with US sensors and weapons. Or course it might just have been because Biden could at least remember our prime minister's name.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,139
Location
Redcar
I think it's unlikely to be either an Astute (very Gucci piece of kit) or a Virginia (though I do think if they go fully off the shelf Virginia is the more likely bet though probably without so much focus on land attack). But what caught my eye (and others) was this announcement a few days ago:

Design work for the next-generation of Royal Navy submarines is underway following the award of two contracts to UK industry, the Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has today announced.

Two contracts worth £85 million each had been awarded to BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce to deliver design and concept work for a future Class of Royal Navy submarine.

Over the next three years and supporting 350 jobs in the process, the contracts will deliver design work to inform a future decision which will help define the replacement approach for the Astute Class submarines – the nuclear powered fleet of submarines (SSNs) currently in service with the Royal Navy.


Now Astute is not expected to be replaced until around the late 2030s early 2040s (Barrow being occupied building the Dreadnought class ballistic missile boats in the meantime) and I'm sure Australia will wanting something in the water before the late 2030s! But considering they're starting from scratch I wouldn't be surprised to see it taking out to the late 2020s or even early 2030s. It's taking the US with their drumbeat of Virginia class construction around three years from laying down to commissioning, you have to figure that as Australia are building a nuclear sub capability from scratch it'll take them longer even if a submarine was laid down tomorrow for them in a US yard (Barrow don't have the spare capacity and besides it takes us about eight years to build an Astute class).

But the Royal Navy's future requirements for a replacement for Astute might dovetail quite nicely with the Australian need for their new SSNs. Something to keep an eye on anyway.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
4,918
The US have been decommissioning their older Los Angeles class submarines. I wonder whether rather than scrapping, at least some could be refurbished to provide Australia with an immediate capability whilst the production facilities for their own ones is sorted out?
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,692
Location
Solihull
No, the submarines will require a lot of work to be made useful and cost a lot. Now i could be a shore based one be used for some training (in the US) but thats it.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,960
Location
Fenny Stratford
The US have been decommissioning their older Los Angeles class submarines. I wonder whether rather than scrapping, at least some could be refurbished to provide Australia with an immediate capability whilst the production facilities for their own ones is sorted out?

I think reactor safety protocols/procedures is something that takes years to develop!
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,206
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Looks like the first response from the French government has reached Australia..

I can tell you now that was interesting to say the lest.
I was at work and was wondering why my workbench was wobbling up and down. About 5 seconds later it really hit. Easily the biggest I've felt.
 

Sm5

Member
Joined
21 Oct 2016
Messages
1,013
But I'm sure Australia could remain safe without it. Similarly if Luxembourg and New Zealand decide not to have their own subs.
Landlocked Hungary has one of the largest navies in Eastern Europe.

Go figure.
 

Attachments

  • ADA55690-9231-4BC6-9621-91D86D6DFF8F.jpeg
    ADA55690-9231-4BC6-9621-91D86D6DFF8F.jpeg
    232 KB · Views: 9
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top