• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How the FLIRTS would look if some other operators had them

Status
Not open for further replies.

Prestige15

Member
Joined
6 Aug 2016
Messages
487
Location
Warrington
Which TOC do you think would work well with the FLIRTS?

Moderator note: original source
Permission reportedly granted by "TrainRealm" on Youtube.
 

Attachments

  • 745.jpg
    745.jpg
    226.2 KB · Views: 125
  • 745 2.png
    745 2.png
    35.8 KB · Views: 124
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,163
Location
North London or Mildmay line
I personally would like to see them on GWR, Southeastern and Northern but I fear the orders will go to Derby, Goole or Newton Aycliffe to try and keep them open.
 

Prestige15

Member
Joined
6 Aug 2016
Messages
487
Location
Warrington
I personally would like to see them on GWR, Southeastern and Northern but I fear the orders will go to Derby, Goole or Newton Aycliffe to try and keep them open.
I fear that too, But cannot deny that the FLIRT are some serious units, Stadlers are one clever company, I would like to see them with GWR too, If all thier proposed Bristol Metro happened, these unit will be perfect on those service as well as Cornwall branches.

I would also add that these would work well with Southern's uneletricfied routes too
 

Zomboid

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
2,310
Location
Oxford
I think the colour schemes where the paint leans forwards (Chiltern, LNR) doesn't work at all with the leaning back shape of the cab - but those operators wouldn't be applying that scheme anyway.

I think they're good trains, so I'd like to see them on the services I use, which would mostly mean Chiltern and EWR, assuming it actually opens one day.
 

Trainlog

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2022
Messages
568
Location
Maidstone
I would also add that these would work well with Southern's uneletricfied routes too
They would be perfect for those routes. Being Bi-mode they can take advantage of the electrified sections of the Eastcoastway/Marshlink and Uckfield lines, and then diesel usage will just be for the unelectrified sections of these routes. It allows for the Uckfield service to run electric into London past Hurst Green, and allows for faster acceleration on the East Coastway section.

The released turbostars from Southern could definitely find usage elsewhere on the national network.
 

tfw756rider

On Moderation
Joined
30 Nov 2024
Messages
1,976
Location
Wales (sometimes in England), thanks for replying!
They would be perfect for those routes. Being Bi-mode they can take advantage of the electrified sections of the Eastcoastway/Marshlink and Uckfield lines, and then diesel usage will just be for the unelectrified sections of these routes. It allows for the Uckfield service to run electric into London past Hurst Green, and allows for faster acceleration on the East Coastway section.

The released turbostars from Southern could definitely find usage elsewhere on the national network.
Funny how I'm reading about 171s being converted to 170s in the future on the same day and site as I was reading in another thread about 168s being converted to 170s in the future (albeit a lot later) :lol:
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,520
Location
Lichfield
Seen these on Reddit.

I can't actually pick a favourite, all the liveries look good on a Flirt, I guess that shows what a good design they are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top