Hi all,
I was stopped at Farringdon station on my commute from St Albans (GTR). I was stopped for having bought a ticket after the departure of the train.
I had initially bought a ticket on the same day for that journey with a 26-30 railcard that I used to board the train. I then realised my railcard had expired when I re-downloaded the app after I saw the revenue protection team at the gates at Farringdon, I re-downloaded the app knowing I would need to show it to them with my ticket. After realising it was expired I purchased a new ticket without the railcard prior to getting to the gates, at which point I was stopped with the new ticket which was flagged as having been purchased after the departure of the train (which of course it had been). I did not realise at the time that a ticket had to be bought before departure for it to be valid.
In my witness statement I did not mention the railcard, partly through panic, but also because I thought that it would make things worse. I clearly also didn’t appreciate the severity of either of those actions at the time, or the fact it was a criminal offence to travel without a valid ticket bought prior to departure.
I have now had a notice of intention to prosecute from GTR, citing not having a valid ticket for travel. It does not make reference to any invalid railcards (not that I really expected that in the first letter from them having read this forum).
I have drafted a response in line with the guidance I have seen elsewhere in this forum, and would appreciate any advice on whether or not to bring up the railcard in my initial response as well.
Advice from previous threads seem to read as not providing information on anything unless asked, but I want to be helpful in ensuring this can be settled without court proceedings as I was genuinely not trying to evade paying any fares with either the expired railcard, or in purchasing the new ticket.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I was stopped at Farringdon station on my commute from St Albans (GTR). I was stopped for having bought a ticket after the departure of the train.
I had initially bought a ticket on the same day for that journey with a 26-30 railcard that I used to board the train. I then realised my railcard had expired when I re-downloaded the app after I saw the revenue protection team at the gates at Farringdon, I re-downloaded the app knowing I would need to show it to them with my ticket. After realising it was expired I purchased a new ticket without the railcard prior to getting to the gates, at which point I was stopped with the new ticket which was flagged as having been purchased after the departure of the train (which of course it had been). I did not realise at the time that a ticket had to be bought before departure for it to be valid.
In my witness statement I did not mention the railcard, partly through panic, but also because I thought that it would make things worse. I clearly also didn’t appreciate the severity of either of those actions at the time, or the fact it was a criminal offence to travel without a valid ticket bought prior to departure.
I have now had a notice of intention to prosecute from GTR, citing not having a valid ticket for travel. It does not make reference to any invalid railcards (not that I really expected that in the first letter from them having read this forum).
I have drafted a response in line with the guidance I have seen elsewhere in this forum, and would appreciate any advice on whether or not to bring up the railcard in my initial response as well.
Advice from previous threads seem to read as not providing information on anything unless asked, but I want to be helpful in ensuring this can be settled without court proceedings as I was genuinely not trying to evade paying any fares with either the expired railcard, or in purchasing the new ticket.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.