• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Fawley branch: could the line reopen to passenger services?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PTR 444

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2019
Messages
2,647
Location
Wimborne
The council opposed to previous reopening plan because they thought it would take too much revenue from the ferry. Its already subsidised so any reduction would threaten is viability.

The 10 level crossings are another major problem. Either they are, closed, allowed to be used for passenger services (subject to installation of full automatic barriers) or they get replaced by bridges or a mixture of both. If they are allowed to stay it will cause congestion problems and if they are replaced it will significantly increase the cost of reopening (a straightforward replacement will be £4 million). I think School Lane (Fawley) crossing could be closed. Pumpfield Farm crossing could be closed and replaced with a few hundred metres of gravel track to Veal Lane (which only needs to be a call up gated private crossing). One each from the Fawley and Marchwood crossings would need to be replaced by a bridge to maintain reasonable flow of traffic. Jacob's Gutter Lane (Hounsdown) probably needs bridging too. That would mean 2 closures with related works, 3 bridges, 4 automated full barrier crossings and retaining 1 private crossing. Not cheap alongside relaying all the track, some new but basic signalling and three stations including a big a park and ride car park.
Mind you, the difficulty of extending the railway from Hythe to Fawley might make it viable for someone to start up a passenger ferry service from the new Calshot development to Southampton. If operated by the Hythe Ferry Company, they could use it to offset losses from the Soton - Hythe ferry and would mean no need to reinstate passenger rail service south of Hythe.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,445
Mind you, the difficulty of extending the railway from Hythe to Fawley might make it viable for someone to start up a passenger ferry service from the new Calshot development to Southampton. If operated by the Hythe Ferry Company, they could use it to offset losses from the Soton - Hythe ferry and would mean no need to reinstate passenger rail service south of Hythe.

I doubt that will be sufficient population to support such a route if Hythe can only support a service with government funding.

The cheapest option for reopening the line would be terminating passenger services on the north side of West Street in Hythe. A station there would be adequate although not optimal for Hythe but it would allow space for a large car park. It would capture some of the market that "Hythe and Fawley Parkway". It would avoid building one station, replacing or rebuilding 3 level crossings and over 2 miles of track. The line could stay in situ from West Street to the oil refinery in case extra funding was found for a second phase.
 
Last edited:

Romsey

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2019
Messages
358
Location
Near bridge 200
The Fawley branch was maintained to a high standard for the oil trains many of which were RA10. It will certainly need some repairs, but not a wholesale renewal which would completely stuff the economics. Likewise the signalling is suitable for passenger services, although it it described in the Sectional Appendix as a "Goods Line".
The LC refurbishment costs will start with converting Marchwood and School Lane to MCB OD or MCB CCTV as the current standards. School Lane retained manual gates due to its poor sighting and location next to a school. ( The other signalling cost will be adapting the interlocking for main signal aspects in and out of Southampton Central platform 5.) Some of the ahb crossings are close to housing and there isn't room to build overbridges with nice gentle ramps and footpaths wide enough for assault grade baby buggies!

The idea of a fast ferry from the Fawley development has some merit, but I understand that most of the channels to Fawley and Ashlett Creek are shallow and meandering. It would take nearly as long as the Red Jets Between Southampton and West Cowes which take 22/23 minutes so say 20 minutes allowing for slow speed pottering up and down Ashlett Creek.
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,518
Sounds like the perfect job for Hovertravel!
Also no obvious location for landing in Southampton. And if the economics of running a ferry to Hythe are borderline, a hovercraft to Fawley has no chance!
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
All in all this doesn’t sound like it’s going to survive first contact with a realistic scope and costing appraisal!
A P&R station to the west of Hythe would be in the National Park so good luck with that!
Just spend the money on better bus services feeding the ferry!
 

Romsey

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2019
Messages
358
Location
Near bridge 200
Also no obvious location for landing in Southampton. And if the economics of running a ferry to Hythe are borderline, a hovercraft to Fawley has no chance!

The slipway that was used in Southampton in the early 1970's is still in-situ used by a rowing club. I suspect the slipways for the former floating bridge downstream would be too narrow.
1597676938218.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top