Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
From the letters page of the i newspaper (9th June 2022)
'During the forthcoming rail strike, is there an opportunity to schedule engineering works for the days when no trins will be running?'
Ummm, I its more the opposite. If signallers are only on duty from 7 - 7, it means outside of those times you won't be able to signal engineering trains in and out of the possession.
Some engineering work will get cancelled because of the strikes.
At this short notice, very little to no opportunity. The only things likely to get done are emergency repairs. And where signallers are on strike, nothing at all will get done.
Er, who is doing the work?
I was under the impression that Network Rail maintenance staff were also striking….
So, it is irrelevant if the signallers are there or not, if there are no staff on the ground
Er, who is doing the work?
I was under the impression that Network Rail maintenance staff were also striking….
So, it is irrelevant if the signallers are there or not, if there are no staff on the ground
There are still contractors that do the work. The signallers being on strike is the bigger issue and why a lot of the engineering work will be cancelled.
Without trains running there's a good opportunity to do surveys, inspections etc. which do not require engineering trains. But the bigger difficulty will be gaining possession access without a signaller
At this short notice, very little to no opportunity. The only things likely to get done are emergency repairs. And where signallers are on strike, nothing at all will get done.
And even then emergency repairs are only likely to happen if sufficient non-striking staff can be found to complete the repair. That type of work is not typically done by contractors.
With Red Zone working banned on the majority of the network even if there are no trains work can’t take place without a line block. No signaller, no line block, from what I’m hearing those who have been signed off as competent work signalling locations aren’t permitted to grant line blocks….
There will also be an issue with planned patrol works not being able to be taken again due to PWay staff, and signallers being on strike, a risk that patrols wont be carried out and sections of line having to be closed as safety inspections having not been undertaken within the specified times.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Without trains running there's a good opportunity to do surveys, inspections etc. which do not require engineering trains. But the bigger difficulty will be gaining possession access without a signaller
Don't you just love letters pages in newspapers.
Letters pages are like twitter and online forums, they give people the opportunity to air their thoughts, that doesn't mean they are worth listening to.
If those who are working signalling locations aren’t able to grant line blocks, what happens in the case of a broken down train where the driver needs to get out to examine/isolate cocks?
If those who are working signalling locations aren’t able to grant line blocks, what happens in the case of a broken down train where the driver needs to get out to examine/isolate cocks?
If those who are working signalling locations aren’t able to grant line blocks, what happens in the case of a broken down train where the driver needs to get out to examine/isolate cocks?
I would hope that the only places where signallers who can't grant line blocks are rostered for are multi-staffed boxes, and the Shift Manager or a signaller from another workstation can take over the panel for the bits the rostered signaller isn't able to do.
Engrs etc Possessions, that do not require a Signal Box to be open during a possession, can be taken just before a S.Box closes and given upon just after the S.Box opens.
Engrs etc Possessions, that do not require a Signal Box to be open during a possession, can be taken just before a S.Box closes and given upon just after the S.Box opens.
If those who are working signalling locations aren’t able to grant line blocks, what happens in the case of a broken down train where the driver needs to get out to examine/isolate cocks?
I would hope that the only places where signallers who can't grant line blocks are rostered for are multi-staffed boxes, and the Shift Manager or a signaller from another workstation can take over the panel for the bits the rostered signaller isn't able to do.
From the letters page of the i newspaper (9th June 2022)
'During the forthcoming rail strike, is there an opportunity to schedule engineering works for the days when no trins will be running?'
Unlikely considering many of those maintenance grades are also on strike. Not to mention that in my area they need Shift Signaller Managers (SSMs) to ensure possessions go ahead, and they’ll probably be on the panel during strikes. If at all, considering they’re might not be any staff availability overnight if it’s just 0700-1900 as has been mooted.
Exactly- if you are competent to sign a signal box / panel then you are competent to grant a line block. As you have stated, line blocks don't just cover planned work, they also cover failed trains, stop and examine, items dropped from platforms and fault / incident responses.
If you are not competent to grant a line block, you should not be signing the book to take the controls. It is a highly dangerous development to allow unqualified people to take the controls without supervision.
The covid contingency plans did have several scenarios where trains could be run but no blockages could be taken, e.g. one signaller covering two workstations. Whether they could bring back those plans and risk assessments to cover the strike action or not I don't know.
The covid contingency plans did have several scenarios where trains could be run but no blockages could be taken, e.g. one signaller covering two workstations. Whether they could bring back those plans and risk assessments to cover the strike action or not I don't know.
Didnt the Scottish agreement recognise this explicitly? It doesnt help you directly but the prededent it there. Part of the rise to recognise flexibility and part to regcognise cost of living increases?
I know, and I agree that the circumstances are vastly different, however, it doesn't change the fact that the risk assessments have been done. It's not that different than certain changes to maintenance regimes coming in now that covid has proved that they can be lengthened. I don't agree with that either for the record.
Didnt the Scottish agreement recognise this explicitly? It doesnt help you directly but the prededent it there. Part of the rise to recognise flexibility and part to regcognise cost of living increases?
I know, and I agree that the circumstances are vastly different, however, it doesn't change the fact that the risk assessments have been done. It's not that different than certain changes to maintenance regimes coming in now that covid has proved that they can be lengthened. I don't agree with that either for the record.
I would put forward the “argument“ that during covid traffic was a fraction of what is it now, and those measures might of sped up the need for maintenance on certain sections and structures. Maintenance can take a holiday, but deterioration doesn’t.