pdeaves
Established Member
In my 48 years I have never owned a TV (obviously, as a child, it would have been my parents not owning one on my behalf, if you see what I mean). I fill my time with enough other stuff that there is no 'need' for one.
That is a by-product of the ancient system they have in use: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licensing_in_the_United_Kingdom#LASSY_databasethey addressed me by my real one for the 18 years I held a licence but then it got corrupted, which speaks volumes for their levels of competence!
Err, a lot of popular programmes are repeated later on the same day, on a different day at a different time, or on a ‘sister’ channel. Plus there are ‘set top boxes’ that can record TV programmes. Some TVs can also do this. You can then play the programme back when you like, including pausing, rewinding, fast forwarding, and some also offer slow motion. And all in the same quality that the programme was originally broadcast at. And much easier to use than the old VCRs of the past.In terms of actually watching programmes, I find streaming services a ton more convenient, as you can choose what to watch, whenever you're free.
With live broadcasting, you're restricted to one time and (often) one episode. If something of interest is being broadcast from 5 pm to 6 pm, but I don't get home until 6 pm, then there goes my plan right out the window.
You can also watch videos in the background (which is good if you’re listening to music) and download videos as well.People actually pay YouTube to remove the ads?![]()
![]()