• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Crossrail to...Orpington?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
3,186
Location
Way on down South London town
Back in 2005 I had an "entrain" magazine that proposed (along changing all the names of Central London Crossrail stations, for some reason) running the south-eastern branch of Crossrail from Canary Wharf, surfacing at Angerstein Wharf and running towards Lewisham, where a new triangular junction would be built to access the SEML towards Orpington. Such a route seems more "interesting" than the current appendix to Abbey Wood, but what would actually have been the challenges to this routing being built? Aside of course from having to build a new viaduct through Lewisham to link the Blackheath and mainline towards Dover.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
2,020
Location
UK
It would also need to reinstate the triangle at Angerstein Junction, if indeed the line could surface by then. Lewisham has multiple issues with its existing flat junctions, adding more would create a high risk of delays on what should be a reliable branch of the Elizabeth line.

While Woolwich and Abbey Wood may not sound interesting, they do fill trains. The slow line to Orpington does look good for a future Crossrail, though perhaps coming up south of Lewisham.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,941
Location
Airedale
Leaving aside the practicalities,
(1) Canary Wharf to Lewisham is covered by DLR
(2) Central London to Lewisham is potentially covered by the Bakerloo extension
which suggests that any need for an Orpington diversion is (will/could be) met in other ways.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top