• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cheadle Hulme Junction

Status
Not open for further replies.

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
Why do signallers seem to give priority to Stoke line trains at this junction? I frequently travel from Wilmslow to Manchester and back and often get held short of Cheadle Hulme to accomdate a crossing movement off the Stoke line - even though my train is on time! This happens to Northern 323s, ATW South Wales services, X-Country Bournemouth Voyagers, and even (though much less often) to Virgin Pendelinos.

Supplementary question; when the Macclesfield to Stockport railway was built, why didn't it go direct to Stockport to join the Manchester - Crewe line there? That seems far more logical than the sharp turn at Poynton towards the Crewe line, and the even sharper turn at Cheadle Hulme Junction itself to join that line.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,401
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
With regard to your supplementary question, the Manchester and Birmingham Railway constructed the line via Cheadle Hulme and Wilmslow to Crewe in 1842. It was not until 1845 that the junction line from that line, from Cheadle Hulme via Macclesfield to Stoke on Trent was completed, hence the reason for its route.

I have only just finished reading a book on the very early days of this railway that is now long out of print, but was lent to me by another old railway enthusiast.
 

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
With regard to your supplementary question, the Manchester and Birmingham Railway constructed the line via Cheadle Hulme and Wilmslow to Crewe in 1842. It was not until 1845 that the junction line from that line, from Cheadle Hulme via Macclesfield to Stoke on Trent was completed, hence the reason for its route.

That doesn't explain it at all. Why was the 1845 line not built to Macclesfield directly from a junction at Stockport, a more direct route and one that would avoid the tight reverse curves to meet the Crewe line at Cheadle Hulme instead of at Stockport?
 

The Crab

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2011
Messages
271
If I remember correctly there was to have been a direct line to Stockport but when it was delayed it was cheaper to build via the present route.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top