• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Briway, for "Waddon"

Status
Not open for further replies.

tomlawton

New Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
1
Hi-

while looking for old friends online, I came across a post here asking for information about Briway, as featured here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvAHgwNkbHU . Unfortunately the thread was closed so I couldn't reply, hence starting this one!
I was a Test Track Technician at Briway from 1988 to 1993, when we mothballed the company, and can tell you pretty much anything I can remember..!
Regarding the crash, I (unusually) wasn't driving that day- I was on the signals, and Chris was driving- from the "wrong end", to let the camera sit up front. I don't recall how the demo started, but prior to the crash we performed a pattern of "down through the chicane, straight back up"- the test track was only 300m long, and the straight run downhill- to demonstrate full acceleration and braking- was a bit hairy to do with guests on board. On reaching the top, the car radioed back "Same again", so I set them for the "chicane", to repeat the same pattern. I suspect Alan was on radio, as the control box was loose on the driver's lap, needing a hand to hold it and a hand for the throttle. Chris either didn't hear, or misunderstood, with the results you see in the video (which I can't actually bear to watch just now!).
Actually, we did recover from that accident- it was relatively early in development, manually driven, with most safety devices not yet installed, and the Railway Inspectorate were, I think, understanding. By the time we wound up, we had two fully autonomous vehicles out on the track, playing around each other, with full, Railway Inspectorate-approved hardware safety systems. (Careful ring-fencing kept us to under 1kB of safety-critical code, which could be proved fail-safe by formal methods. The vehicle had dual control computers, and an arbiter which selected the "safer" of the two)
We were, at the end- as we understood it on the "shop floor"- sole preferred bidder for Hong Kong's Chek Lap Kok; however, Bristow had run out of money to "play with", and failed to find a taker for his curious business terms: he approached a number of players- Alsthom included- for a million pounds, for a year, which he would pay back with interest if the airport job didn't come through. If it did, they'd have to buy the company out in full for the 8 million he'd put in. He gave them 2 weeks to make up their minds. It was just too unconventional for corporate companies to consider...!

Hope that was of interest- I can give you any more details that you might like. I was very pleased to find that Briway finally had a mention on the web, and I've often thought I ought to make a site dedicated to it, so it's not forgotten...

Cheers, Tom
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top