Might be splitting hairs but RMT offered 5% ASLEF offered 4% if I remember correctly
Correct.
RMT have never been offered less than 5% year one.
They were offered 5% Year One, 5% Year Two with strings that some TOC had to adhere to, whilst others already had those conditions... but all were offered 5% Year Two regardless.
The offer in November/December 2023 to RMT was 5% Year One, with Year Two to be negotiated at local TOC level with changes to T&Cs at local TOC level.
ASLEF's first offer, before any talks took place (despite a year of asking for for pay talks), was 5% Year One, 5% Year Two, again with strings that some TOC had to adhere to, whilst others already had those conditions... but all were offered 5% Year Two regardless.
ASLEF's second offer, after pay talks took place in February/March 2023, was
4% Year One (and let's at this point just remember that some TOCs have their pay anniversary in January, some in April, some in May, and some in October - so RPI actually was significantly different as the months went by), 5% Year Two, with what ASLEF initially thought at the end of the talks, was any T&C change/productivity payments, to be negotiated at local TOC level, but got a phonecall the next day to say, "Oh, we got it wrong, Year Two is 5% for
all the T&C changes [that some will have and others won't] as well."
So... a WORSE deal than the initial offer.
A WORSE DEAL THAN THE INITIAL (non-negotiated) OFFER.
Now why would they do that? Unless... they actually wanted to provoke Industrial Action, in order to substantiate their 'solution' of Minimum Service Levels (a Manifesto pledge), and once in (with cheerleaders from the sidelines), use the opportunity and precedent that has been set, to roll out to other workers in other areas of society.
Otherwise, why put
SO much effort into not engaging, and prolonging this dispute?