Hellfire is all just a matter of opinion.
Although...I seem to have grown a liking for Pendolinos, but I wouldn't call them hellfire.
37s however, are.
158s are quite hellfire too though![]()
I drive them and generally find 159/0's slower accelerating.I did actually think 158's were 400hp and 159/0's 350 hp.I could ask Salisbury drivers as they are on them all the time.Did get a briefing on the 159/1's and the 158's.That was about all.
I still remember being on the last service of the day a couple of years ago to Carlisle on a 390 and hearing the 390 screaming along. What the noise actually was I don't know.......
And I just heard 442s were going to be running Holyhead to Chesters....
20s won't be able to provide ETH
Sadly, it is normally a 350hp version and they struggle getting up past pontpool & new inn. On a few occiasions they have struggle to go faster that 30mph up the hill.
I would rather see a class 37 with 4mk2's anyday or two 37's with 10 mk2's, now that is hellfire!!
And I just heard 442s were going to be running Holyhead to Chesters....
Dave is wrong, the 442s will be hauled by TnT 31/4s.
20s won't be able to provide ETH
Yes they will they are coming from DRS and utilising a modified Eurostar generator coach they recently acquired![]()
So what do you fools not like about the 158's then??????????????
The fact that they couldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding and on hot days at least one engine will overheat, the cabs are awful, ie cramped, uncomfortable,cabs are hot in summer but you cant open the window as the vestibule access door may well fly open and take your fingers off, visibility is pathetic as you have no peripheral vision and cab is very dark, the gangway door lets noisy and cold draughts in and flies open at 90mph, the headlights are useless at night, the forward/reverse controller sprains your wrist when you operate it it's that stiff, the wipers pack up when on slow and disintegrate when on fast, and you get backache on a three hour run, they are ugly, cheap and plasticy, unreliable, and personally i'd scrap the lot after i'd done the 153's!
And yes, i DO drive them!
Give me a 170 anyday, no more reliable but a damn site more comfortable and bright!
Give me a 170 anyday, no more reliable but a damn site more comfortable and bright!
The new refurb'd SWT 159's are comfy, & yes, a lot better than the dilapidated 158's FGW operate. Havn't been on one of their refurb'd units yet, but I try to avoid the unrefurb'd units, they're awful.![]()
158s are hellfire!![]()
The new refurb'd SWT 159's are comfy, & yes, a lot better than the dilapidated 158's FGW operate. Havn't been on one of their refurb'd units yet, but I try to avoid the unrefurb'd units, they're awful.![]()
Contradiciton?
Refurb 159s good (which they are!!)
Refurb units awful
Hmmmmmmmm
Contradiciton?
Refurb 159s good (which they are!!)
Refurb units awful
Hmmmmmmmm
Had one of our loan units to Brookside and back yesterday, 890.
Got treated to an impromptu cold shower whilst doing 90 through Bamford!
The roof was obviously leaking and collecting water somewhere, before overflowing through the light fitting. "BRRRRRRRRRRR!!!".
I will confess though, that i do like the modified direction controller on this particular unit, much easier to use than the tiny wrist spraining ones on all the others. If anyone out there had anything to do with that, then well done, lets fit that to all of em (If we can't scrap em that is!)
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I think Mart means that he hasn't been on a refurbed FGW 158.