• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

16-25 Minimum Fare - dispute

Status
Not open for further replies.

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
5,554
Hi All,

I'm acting as an intermediary for a friend of mine who, for some reason, purchased a 16-25 discounted Anytime Day Single (£6.00) in advance of the date of travel. When travelling, he was charged for a brand new, undiscounted, ticket because he was travelling before the minimum fare threshold.

Was this correct procedure please? I have an inkling that it is.

Cheers,

TP
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,256
Location
Yorkshire
Should have been charged an excess fare, in my opinion.
 

Be3G

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2012
Messages
1,599
Location
Chingford
It's a bit of a grey area; railcard literature makes it very clear what happens if one forgets one's railcard, in which case a new ticket should be sold, but that isn't applicable here. The closest match in terms of documented railway ‘offences’ that I can think of is the use of an off-peak ticket during peak hours, in which case as yorkie says an excess would be the appropriate course of action.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,082
Location
Redcar
I think an excess would have been appropriate but it's definitely a bit of a grey area!
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
5,554
An excess was indeed my initial thoughts too. I've told him to retain all tickets and I'll draft a letter to the TOC concerned.

TP
 

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
I agree. NRCoC 12 states:
Restrictions apply to the use of some tickets (including those bought with a Railcard) in addition to/other than those in Condition 10 above such as the dates, days, and times when you can use them, and the trains in which they can be used. These restrictions will be made clear to you by the seller when you buy your ticket. If a restriction applies and the ticket you are using is not valid for the train you are travelling in, then:
(a) you will be liable to pay an excess fare (the difference between the price paid for the ticket you hold and the price of the lowest priced ticket available for immediate travel that would have entitled you to travel in that train for the journey shown on the ticket); or
(b) in the case of some types of discounted tickets (as indicated in the notices and publications) Condition 2 or 4 will apply.

The part I have bolded seems to apply pretty clearly to this situation. There is no mention in the Railcard T&Cs that travelling with a ticket below the minimum fare before 10 am will result in a new ticket being sold. Therefore I don't see 12(b) applying, which means that an excess is expected as per 12(a).

I can understand why a new ticket may have been sold though, especially if there is an Off Peak ticket valid after 10 am.
 

revenueadvice

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
74
It's common practice too excess the ticket. Have had people doing this on a persistent basis. Which has resulted in a statement being taken under caution and sent off to prosecution but as a one off mistake the excess fare is the "norm" where I work.
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
5,554
Certainly a customer service jobby then! Thanks for the NRCoC extract, may come in handy! :smile:

TP
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top