• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

121/960s or 444s?

Bubbles or 444s?

  • Bubbles (121s/960s)

    Votes: 24 70.6%
  • 444s

    Votes: 10 29.4%

  • Total voters
    34
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
Wasn't the one I was thinking of. I was thinking of that waiter in The Simpsons, in the episode entitled something like 'Homer And The Mob', where Homer becomes a bodyguard and takes the mayor to a restaurant:

Homer: Excuse me, do you have a table for the mayor?
Waiter: Yyyyyyyyyyes!
Homer: Why do you talk like that?
Waiter: I had a strrrrrrrroke!
 

Coxster

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
9,243
Two 444s I have bashed actually.
Oh, that's a fair comparison then. SWT's fleet judged by someone who has been on one twice on two fairly short journeys, compared to people who live on the network...
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
In all fairness, I don't have much experience on 444s because they don't operate anywhere near me. I do plan to do some more 444 bashing when the chance arises, this will be on a Megatrain bash to Pompey sometime later this year.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
That's not too likely...

If it is I'll walk away and go somewhere else. Pure and simple. I refuse to get a 442, in the same way I refuse to board a 222 (I made the same promise back in September 2006 - if if were a 222 I'd give up my tickets and go spotting around London instead of doing the MML).

Call me immature if you will for having such opinions and such, but I won't travel on something I don't like! If that means my HT 222s lists remain completely blank for all eternity then so bloody be it!
 

960012

Established Member
Joined
4 Nov 2005
Messages
1,892
Location
Parkstone
That's not too likely...

If it is I'll walk away and go somewhere else. Pure and simple. I refuse to get a 442, in the same way I refuse to board a 222 (I made the same promise back in September 2006 - if if were a 222 I'd give up my tickets and go spotting around London instead of doing the MML).

Call me immature if you will for having such opinions and such, but I won't travel on something I don't like! If that means my HT 222s lists remain completely blank for all eternity then so bloody be it!

So going on that theory, u wont travel on 220s/221s? as there are nioen on the same train!!!
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
Precisely! WTF is 'nioen'? :read2:

I will do a Voyager, that I have little problem with (unless there's a booked HST/loco-hauled run doing the same route). Blame me for all eternity if you will after I make this statement:

On occasions (this much I stress to add and make clear) I like Voyagers. On a rare occasion I will actually go out of my way to ensure I get a Voyager vice anything else. On this basis, one day I plan to do the Penzance - Dundee Voyager run.
 
T

Tom

Guest
You have just completely lost me...

Pioneers/Meridians/Voyagers are basically the same train... what are you going to do when the HSTs disappear on MML?
 

960012

Established Member
Joined
4 Nov 2005
Messages
1,892
Location
Parkstone
Pioneers/Meridians/Voyagers are basically the same train

Thats wat i tried to say but i cant type or spell!!!!! he really makes no sense, will do a voyager not meridian or pioneeer!!! makes no sense!!
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
Voyagers are much better than Meridians and Pioneers!

EDIT: As for what I'll do when HSTs finish on the MML, I'll just have to avoid it, getting buses and whatever to get to the stations instead.
 

Nathan

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Messages
1,050
That's not too likely...

If it is I'll walk away and go somewhere else. Pure and simple. I refuse to get a 442, in the same way I refuse to board a 222 (I made the same promise back in September 2006 - if if were a 222 I'd give up my tickets and go spotting around London instead of doing the MML).

Call me immature if you will for having such opinions and such, but I won't travel on something I don't like! If that means my HT 222s lists remain completely blank for all eternity then so bloody be it!

Its a good policy by me, i hope never to step a foot on a 442 again. If through unusual circumstances, then i must board a desiro within the same day!
 

Ascot

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2005
Messages
3,384
Location
Birmingham, UK
What's the difference what turns up or not?? I'd rather get on a replacement bus than be late for something never mind if it's a 442 or 222 or watev.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
Please explain your reasoning.

At a date and time to be decided (ie, when I can be bothered to list the reasons).

Nathan, good plan. I'm like that with a lot of stuff. If I got, say, a 180 instead of a HST I must also try to get a HST in too! Didn't work on the 10th of December 2006 though...:evil2:

I will add that the time when I vowed to throw away my tickets and do London instead was a trip JUST to do the MML on a HST. I knew I had a 222 back, so if it weren't a HST up I wouldn't have gone. I wouldn't have booked tickets, or for that matter gone to London full stop, otherwise.
 
T

Tom

Guest
Which will probably have been ripped out of a Wessex Electric by the amount of time FGW are eating up coaches and power cars... ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top