I assume the train was stationary at the time looking at the photo?
The photo doesn't make a lot of sense at first glance.
The bus appears to be damaged on the side of the pillars holding the ramp, not the train, which is inconsistent with crashing into a train.
The rear locomotive, and loader wagon appear to be level with bottom of a ramp, but a ramp facing wrong way for vehicles, so either train is a short half length formation or it had been moved.
The bridging plates (the flaps that lower sideways onto platforms appear to be up, which suggests train wasn't loading or unloading, so why was bus alongside it, unless plates had just been raised.
The buses pick up from the back and take drivers to the drivers carriage at the front, if bus was still alongside rear carriage, why would it be full with reported 19 people on board, as they fill up as they move closer to the drivers carriage, and not full at opposite end, and photo doesn't include a drivers coach at that end of the train.
I am baffled at the moment as photo doesn't match the news story