• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How do chargeable drop off areas work legally?

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
114,089
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
My understanding after watching a YT from a barrister is that private car parks have to give you a grace period where you can read the terms and conditions, and decide if you want to stay or not.

I wonder how the "pay to drop off" places work around that? Are they legally toll roads rather than parking?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Gaelan

Member
Joined
3 Apr 2023
Messages
1,015
Location
Edinburgh
I wonder how the "pay to drop off" places work around that? Are they legally toll roads rather than parking?
My guess would be that the "grace period" is a best practice arising from the general principles of contract law - you can't be taken to have agreed to a contract you never had an opportunity to read - rather than being a specific ironclad rule. I think if there are very clear "drop off £x" signs, and you drop someone off, it's reasonable to assume you agreed to pay £x, even if it'd be harder to enforce some more specific term of any T&Cs (for example that you pay in a certain fashion, or a specific penalty for not paying in time).
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,726
Location
Isle of Man
I wonder how the "pay to drop off" places work around that? Are they legally toll roads rather than parking?
The places which operate pay to drop off (airports, mainly) generally operate under their own byelaws so they’re subject to different rules. Parking there isn’t based on contractual terms, it’s based on the law, so there’s no need for a grace period.

There are pros and cons to this. The big pro is that, as statutory land, they’re not allowed to presume that the registered keeper of a car was driving it. So it is easier to challenge tickets sent relating to statutory land by simply not saying who was driving the car.

The big con is that statutory land isn’t subject to the ban on clamping. Nottingham NET take great pleasure in using clamps to enforce their car parks.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,791
Location
LBK
The solution to clamping is to buy four clamps of your own and clamp your own car before leaving.
 

sprunt

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
1,662
Haven't there been a number of people on here previously saying that they don't work legally, and you can safely ignore the requests for payment?

(Whether that's correct or not I have no idea.)
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,985
Location
Gwynedd
Haven't there been a number of people on here previously saying that they don't work legally, and you can safely ignore the requests for payment?

(Whether that's correct or not I have no idea.)
Sort of, but it's more nuanced than that.

In England & Wales, the Protection of Freedoms Act allows transferring the liability of a driver's breach of contract to the registered keeper of the vehicle involved in the breach. So if you don't pay for your car parking in a private car park in England or in Wales, the car park operator can get the registered keeper's details and take them all the way to county claims court, get a CCJ against the registered keeper, and enforce it with court bailiffs if needed.

In Scotland and in Northern Ireland, this legislation doesn't apply, which is why you'll see people often saying you can just bin car park charge letters in Scotland for example. The car park operator can get the registered keeper's details from DVLA like in England and Wales, but the only person liable for breaching the contract is the driver. If the registered keeper doesn't identify the driver, it becomes infeasible to track down who was driving and pursue the charge. If you do it often enough though then the balance does tip back towards the operator finding it worthwhile tracking down the driver as there's more money at stake.

The Protection of Freedoms Act is quite specific though in saying that it only applies to 'relevant land', which is land where parking isn't covered by other statutes. This means it doesn't apply to say council car parks (though the law for council car parks is stricter and can be enforced against the registered keeper even in Scotland). It also means it doesn't apply to most airport car parks because these tend to be governed by bylaws. So if you very sparingly breach major airports' car parking terms, don't reply to their letters to identify the driver, and don't pay up, there's a fair chance you'll get away with it.

The caution here is that you're taking the risk that the operator won't invest the time to identify the driver through some other means. The charge is still valid as the driver has breached the contract, and the debt therefore still exists. If the operator manages to identify the driver somehow, the driver can expect the usual late payment and legal fees etc to be added on if it gets taken further.
 

johncrossley

Established Member
Joined
30 Mar 2021
Messages
4,486
Location
London
Are there any airports that don't have a free drop off alternative, usually an off-site car park with a free courtesy bus? In the case of Belfast City, their free drop off area is only a few minutes walk from the terminal. Do these free drop off alternatives exist for legal reasons?
 

Top