• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Has the government ever consulted on closing a station and then NOT closed it?

Western Lord

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
1,065
Following up - this is a good subject for a separate, speculative thread.

Would the Ingleton route actually have been suitable as a main line?

And what about the wars? Weren't both the WCML and the S&C heavily used in both world wars? There were those huge munitions works near Annan. I presume they produced bombs, which would have been transported to Lincolnshire and East Anglian bases. They would have needed a lot of trains, surely?
The ingleton route was a well aligned double track railway.
As for war time traffic, I doubt if the builders of railways in the Victorian era were thinking "this line will be useful in the forthcoming two World Wars".
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
4,099
The ingleton route was a well aligned double track railway.
As for war time traffic, I doubt if the builders of railways in the Victorian era were thinking "this line will be useful in the forthcoming two World Wars".
Funny, you may be surprised, but I doubt it too.
However, once WW1 began, I would posit that the WCML, S&C and ECML were all very much needed for their full lengths.
It seems to me that these 'special needs' periods are often seem forgotten in evaluating the ultimate value of trunk lines such as the S&C and GC after the event.
 

Lucan

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2018
Messages
1,265
Location
Wales
When talking about this line [Oxford-Cambridge] many people seem to be under the impression that it was a fast link between the two University cities,
C S Lewis used it a lot, and in one of his memoirs he said he liked the slow pace because it gave him time to say his prayers. I guess he gave some long prayers.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,280
Finstock and Combe came up for closure in 1994 (but were saved by the Cotswold Line Promotion Group-source). Don’t know if it got to the consultation stage, but they have a more or less usable service for commuting now (and, from experience travelling on the stopping train several times, 5-10 regular passengers each day even with the limited service).
While the CLPG campaigned against the closure proposals, what really saved Combe and Finstock from the axe was that British Rail had messed up the applications for closure.

The reason given for the proposals was that because so few passengers used the two halts, it would not be cost-effective to extend their platforms to meet new safety standards.

However, they did not notify the Health & Safety Executive about this, so that it could give an official response. When this omission came to light, the applications were ruled invalid.

By then the 1993 Railways Act, the legislation for rail privatisation, had become law. This meant that the old process to apply for station closures was replaced and BR did not bother to restart the process under the new rules.

The halts had much the same weekday one train into Oxford and one back service then. There used to be a second train into Oxford in the morning peak that lasted, I think, until the late 1980s, which left Moreton-in-Marsh at 06.10.

This was followed by the 07.45 departure from Moreton, which was the rough equivalent of today's morning peak Class 165 stopper from Worcester.

But there were also Saturday calls at both halts and at Ascott-under-Wychwood and Shipton (and more services both ways than on weekdays) but they were dropped from the timetable in 2006, with Shipton the only one to keep its Saturday services.
 

Top