Really hoping that isn’t the case!Left Twyford few mins ago. Now over 3 hour delay. Maybe im on the last one to PAD for today. Cant see anything on tracksy leaving RDG.
Thats supplied from the local DNO. Maybe an issue of crew relief being able to get to the stationsHow come this incident has also now taken out the Greenford branch? It was running fine for hours during this but it now hasn't run in over 2 hours. Same with the Henley branch, which hasn't run for over an hour.
Edit: forgot the Greenford is running the 230 today, so presumably it's affected the recharging system used for it?
How come this incident has also now taken out the Greenford branch? It was running fine for hours during this but it now hasn't run in over 2 hours. Same with the Henley branch, which hasn't run for over an hour.
Edit: forgot the Greenford is running the 230 today, so presumably it's affected the recharging system used for it?
As Contactless isn't valid beyond Virginia Water, in strict terms a 'normal' ticket needs to be purchased. When using Contactless, a user has not already committed to their journey in the way they have when they have bought a physical ticket.Constant announcements on SWR but the most interesting for this disruption. What about those that used contactless to go to London but not valid on SWR?
What are your options?
-
We are sorry for the disruption to your journey today, these are the current options available to you:
-
Option 1: You may use your ticket at no additional cost on the following operators:
>Chiltern Railway services between Oxford and London Marylebone
>South Western Railway services between Reading and London Waterloo
>London Underground Bakerloo and Jubilee lines
-
Option 2: Replacement transport provided by us such as a buses, coaches or taxis, have not been requested at this time. The overal geographical area affected by this incident means that it is not a practal proposition. We will continue to monitor the need for this as the situation develops.
-
-
Option 3: Tickets dated for today (05/09/26) will be valid for travel tomorrow (06/09/26), on Great Western Railway services.
I doubt if anyone on the railways is going to be bothered. Waterloo to Reading services were so full passengers were unable to board as far west as Ascot and Bracknell so there's zero chance of any ticket checks.As Contactless isn't valid beyond Virginia Water, in strict terms a 'normal' ticket needs to be purchased. When using Contactless, a user has not already committed to their journey in the way they have when they have bought a physical ticket.
GWR are a bit deficient on their journey check page by not making clear what should happen for passengers who wish to use Contactless.
I always wonder why they don't try to spread the demand between London and Reading away from the Staines route via Guildford or Basingstoke when the line via Slough is unavailable (although I note that the capacity between Guildford or Basingstoke and Reading is less).I doubt if anyone on the railways is going to be bothered. Waterloo to Reading services were so full passengers were unable to board as far west as Ascot and Bracknell so there's zero chance of any ticket checks.
It maybe that the isolation had to be extensive with all the overhead feeders in this area to allow London Fire Brigade to fight the fire so they couldn't try using an alternative feed from the Reading direction.Just to understand, as might need to travel tomorrow. The power supply issue is so serious, it may not be fixed. So tomorrow (Sunday) could be an IET-only operation, all on diesel? (Sorry if asking something obvious to others).
I always wonder why they don't try to spread the demand between London and Reading away from the Staines route via Guildford or Basingstoke when the line via Slough is unavailable (although I note that the capacity between Guildford or Basingstoke and Reading is less).
Just to understand, as might need to travel tomorrow. The power supply issue is so serious, it may not be fixed. So tomorrow (Sunday) could be an IET-only operation, all on diesel? (Sorry if asking something obvious to others).
Reading to Waterloo is 86 minutes direct via Staines, but can be quicker via Basingstoke with a good connection into a fast train, and broadly on a par via Guildford.Basingstoke might be reasonable for a fast train to London but via Guildford is quite the diversion. Most people just want go get London as quickly as possible. But obviously SWR can’t soak up all the demand between Reading <> Paddington on a Saturday afternoon.
Reading to Waterloo is 86 minutes direct via Staines, but can be quicker via Basingstoke with a good connection into a fast train, and broadly on a par via Guildford.
That’s because I removed them. I couldn’t find out how to delete my post completelyThese links aren't working for me
Good god. Is that melted cable in the trunking tend to be signalling and comms cables, or is it also power?NR Western have put up some pictures. Looks pretty extensive damage so done well to get things back up running.
![]()
![]()
Not exactly a fair or true post mortem though is it...Post mortem: Once again, a single point of electrical-supply failure has caused extended chaos.
This has been exacerbated by the shift to electric-power... it was a touch ironic that only the diesel-powered units could keep running
The compound where the chaps in orange are standing is the switching area for the main Kensal Green autotransformer feeder station (ATFS) for the east end of the GWML. I wonder how badly the control and communications cabling has been damaged. Also, do they use trackside cabling to distribute the AC to the 25kV system in that area, there seems very little visible overhead?NR Western have put up some pictures. Looks pretty extensive damage so done well to get things back up running.
![]()
The supply can be configured to feed from somewhere else if a particular supply is lost, which is almost certainly what they have done here.Post mortem: Once again, a single point of electrical-supply failure has caused extended chaos.