Minnietheminx
Member
Many Britannia hotels used to be quite good. Then they became Britannia hotels...Can't be: they wrote "Used to be a really good hotel" lol
Many Britannia hotels used to be quite good. Then they became Britannia hotels...Can't be: they wrote "Used to be a really good hotel" lol
Many Britannia hotels used to be quite good. Then they became Britannia hotels...
Can't be: they wrote "Used to be a really good hotel" lol
Would it make financial/buisness sense for a high end hotel chain to refurb these building into 5* hotels given the vast amount of work many of these building need?With hotel prices as they are in Liverpool the Adelphi is crying out to become a JW Marriott and get a super posh refurb like St Pancras...maybe less so some of the others.
Would it make financial/buisness sense for a high end hotel chain to refurb these building into 5* hotels given the vast amount of work many of these building need?
Liverpool could never host a hotel as high end as a JW Marriott. An ordinary Marriott perhaps but JWM is the luxury brand. There's only one in the UK and that's the famous old Grosvenor Hotel.With hotel prices as they are in Liverpool the Adelphi is crying out to become a JW Marriott and get a super posh refurb like St Pancras...maybe less so some of the others.
For the pub there is often significant advantages to not taking cash, no one needs to take it to the bank or pay Securicor to collect, the staff can't steal it, the customers can't steal it, the ram-raiders can't steal it and you don't need to pay to insure it.Pubs, caffs and similar establishments refusing to accept cash. An increasing number in Central London, plus the horrible Gail's chain throughout the country.
I’ve wondered if they should be designed to be a bit wider since the cap is staying on. But I guess money means they are adapting it to the current bottle design so it can be sold with removable caps with the same bottle in other countries.Those ridiculous caps on plastic drink bottles which have a strand of plastic to attach the top to the bottle. If you keep it on it gets in the way of you drinking and if you twist and pull it off you end up with a sharp point of plastic which, if you reuse the bottle, you'll inevitably cut your lip on!
I've massively reduced my consumption of bottled drinks as a result of that nonsense. Whether that was really the intended consequence I have no ideaThose ridiculous caps on plastic drink bottles which have a strand of plastic to attach the top to the bottle. If you keep it on it gets in the way of you drinking and if you twist and pull it off you end up with a sharp point of plastic which, if you reuse the bottle, you'll inevitably cut your lip on!
I've massively reduced my consumption of bottled drinks as a result of that nonsense. Whether that was really the intended consequence I have no idea
Pull the cap all the way back and it stays back.Those ridiculous caps on plastic drink bottles which have a strand of plastic to attach the top to the bottle. If you keep it on it gets in the way of you drinking and if you twist and pull it off you end up with a sharp point of plastic which, if you reuse the bottle, you'll inevitably cut your lip on!
The intention was to ensure the caps go into the recycling attached to the bottle, as loose caps are harder to separate to plastic recycling. Also to prevent caps being dropped as litter, as the smaller items are more likely to get left and not picked up.I've massively reduced my consumption of bottled drinks as a result of that nonsense. Whether that was really the intended consequence I have no idea
I see. Well.... another fine example of pretending the first two 'R's don't exist. As long as we recycle recycle recycle, that's three Rs!Pull the cap all the way back and it stays back.
The intention was to ensure the caps go into the recycling attached to the bottle, as loose caps are harder to separate to plastic recycling. Also to prevent caps being dropped as litter, as the smaller items are more likely to get left and not picked up.
Well if you want to reduce and reuse then fill a bottle from the tap and don't buy the single-use bottles at all. The single use PET bottles are not designed for reuse and can lead to other issues if reused.I see. Well.... another fine example of pretending the first two 'R's don't exist. As long as we recycle recycle recycle, that's three Rs!
I remember back in must have been the late 1980s telling someone about carbon tets use in fire extinguishers, he was dumbstruck as he had always assumed it was inflammable.Carbon Tetrachloride + hot Carbon (eg in a cigarette) produces Phosgene which is very much not good for you and was used in WW1 as a poison gas.
I did used to like the smell of it, though. It’s also been used as a fire extinguisher.
Indeed. I now prefer the cap to stay attached so I can't lose it. Whenever I get a bottle without it it just feels wrong now!Pull the cap all the way back and it stays back.
I like Rohan trousers, shirts and jackets.All and any Rohan outdoor and walking gear. When they were still a small family firm with craft workshops in the North of England, they were top quality. Now that they have sold out to the corporate 'big boys' their products are made in China, or sometimes other far-eastern countries and wear-out or disintegrate much more quickly....for the pleasure of paying twice the price.![]()
Berghaus kit is vastly inferior to the 1990s but it's also way cheaper in real terms.
I think I might actually be the only person who likes the car parking apps.
Up to about COVID I did have a small cotton bag of change in the glovebox to avoid being caught out, but these days parking that even takes cash is increasingly rare so I no longer bother.
I remember my absolute fury, about 10 years ago, coming across a parking machine that was cash only and hadn’t been updated to take the new 10p/20p coins (can’t remember which), and I couldn’t make the fare with other coins. I bought something in a nearby shop with a note for change - and all I got was more new coins (I think the machine also insisted on exact fare). Drove away and have cheered every car park updated with contactless/pay by phone sinceI like them too, and quite prepared to pay a little more to use them. So convenient.
Yes, I have a stash of coins (for parking) in the car. I found it on Sunday. I put it there in 2018 and haven’t touched it since.
....plus the North Staffordshire opposite Stoke-on-Trent station and the former Premier Inn at Charing Cross in Glasgow.*Most* of the Britannia Group, with exceptions like their airport ones, used to be incredible hotels - it's what they do, buy up beautiful old hotels that are about to need a maintenance refresh or other refurb and then... not bother. Quite often as the second negligent owner. Stuff like the Adelphi in Liverpool or Grand in Scarborough prime examples of this.
Restaurants that only have order by QR code or website (I have walked out of three so far)
I quite like QR code ordering, if only cause I don't have to tip- haven't really seen it at a proper restaurant though, more nandos or spoons type place. Who is insisting on it though, I've not seen that?
True, but 2FA is so much more secure. Not having it really leaves you open to various types of attacks.Two step authentication dependency. I login my xsx using password but occasionally it wants me to use an alternative method. I don’t but login 2-3 times then it works. Two step authentication is annoying when you are trying to depend a bit less on the smartphone.
True, but 2FA is so much more secure. Not having it really leaves you open to various types of attacks.
Yes, Microsoft's authenticator app is now thankfully becoming a standard across a lot of organisations. Aegis Authenticator is a good open source alternative, too.2FA is good if implemented well, which means using an authenticator app. The Microsoft implementation is by far the best as it ensures (so far as possible), by requiring the code, that you have access to both sides of the situation and there is far less likely to be some sort of phone based fraud going on.
What isn't good is the increasing number of sites that just sack off doing authentication properly at all, and make you send a code to your email/phone *instead* of a password. This is 1FA, not 2FA, and it's inferior 1FA than a password, at that.