Do we know if the government did anything remotely useful before or after the Alert, such as give specific advice to the RHA when it chose to "warn people not to light anything that could spark a fire" as to whether it considered a steam locomotive to be as dangerous as "barbecues, campfires, and fireworks."
I was quite a long way through this thread until I realised the potentially catastrophic effect of a wildfire on a heritage railway specifically. Imagine being the guy who accidentally burned down Beamish's historic town? That would cost millions, impacting an entire regional economy (though you would hope there would be a heartwarming positive effort at maximum mitigation).
It feels unlikely, since Beamish is mostly just fields of grass, iirc, but the steam railway itself runs close to if not right behind buildings which you assume due to their nature, things like a 1920s printworks and motor mechanic's, even a stable, would have any number of combustible materials in them. Even just the (very authentic) sight of random bits of coal and general dusty feel of the place, would fuel a proper wildfire, I am assuming.
If Beamish is even required to have modern fire safety systems, they hide them pretty well it seems. And simply in terms of just being on watch for fires, well, in a place as big as that, it's a big ask surely. And you assume also it's not too easy to access for appliances, who, if actual residences in other places are actually on fire, or the moors, might not even be sent as a priority.
Not to be alarmist, but it is terrifying, from a heritage perspective. I just don't know why you'd even risk it, not once the vegetation is visibly dry. Which had occurred weeks before the Alert even in the NE, as far as I can tell.