• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Phone died after getting on train

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Hello everyone,

I was on the return leg of my journey, which was from Cambridge to Stevenage, when my phone died after I scanned in at Cambridge. A collector then walked past and when I couldn't show her the ticket (which was on my phone), I was issued a penalty fare. I have a 16-25 railcard, and I purchased my return ticket the night before my journey, from the trainline app. The staff asked me where I was headed and I told her I was headed back to Stevenage, and then she took my details and issued me with the fare but told me that I could appeal and it would probably be accepted. However, I have appealed twice now and both times have been rejected. Both rejection emails are below:

Rejection 1:
To ensure fairness and consistency in the decision-making process, appeals are considered in conjunction
with a code of practice. The statements submitted on behalf of the passenger and the train company will
both be taken into account by an experienced assessor to determine the appeal outcome. More information
about how appeals are decided is available on our homepage at www.penaltyservices.co.uk.
Many rail users consider penalty fares to be an accusation of fare avoidance but this is not the case at
all. A Penalty Fare is simply a higher fare which may be issued under The Penalty Fares Rules and
Regulations by a member of staff who is licensed to act on behalf of a train operating company which
issues penalty fares. Penalty fare warning posters are on display at every penalty fares station (as required
under Regulation 8) advising customers of the consequences for boarding a penalty fares train without a
valid ticket or other authority to travel in their possession.
The National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to
boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for
inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they
may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice.
I understand a valid ticket was unavailable for inspection on request because you have stated your
phone battery died.
In accordance with the terms and conditions of use, any pre-ordered ticket must be available for inspection
during travel as evidence of a passenger's right to make a rail journey.
Pre-booked products must be printed, or loaded to a smartcard or electronic device, before a journey starts
in readiness for ticket inspection to take place. Assuming enough battery is held on a device to display the
product, the journey being made is covered by its validity, and the train operator accepts this type of ticket
on its lines of route, an electronic ticket would pass inspection at the time of travel.
All tickets issued are subject to the National Rail Conditions of Travel, which stress that passengers must
show and where asked, hand over for inspection, a valid ticket and any relevant Railcard. If not, they will be
treated as having joined the train without a valid ticket and may be liable to a Penalty Fare Notice or
prosecution. Unfortunately, these conditions do not facilitate the production of a ticket at a different time
(with the exception of certain season tickets).
The safekeeping of a ticket is the passenger’s responsibility and unfortunately (with the exception of some
season tickets) lost, mislaid, discarded or stolen tickets tend not to be replaced. The NRCoT explains the
passenger's rights in relation to any refunds for unused tickets.

A receipt or proof of payment is not a ticket, is not valid for travel and will not be accepted in place of a
ticket at the time of travel. Similarly, a ticket that has been produced for inspection at a later date cannot be
used to cancel a Penalty Fare Notice (with the exception of certain season tickets).
Whether or not a ticket was bought is not being disputed by the train company.
As a valid ticket could not be produced for inspection on request at the time of travel, I'm afraid it has been
concluded by Penalty Services that the Penalty Fare Notice should stand.
Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been
unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision. Any further appeal will be considered by a different
appeal assessor. If re-appealing, please give the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and
also mention any additional circumstances you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be
submitted by post to: Penalty Services, 12 Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach,
Woodbridge, IP12 1BL, or through our website at www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14
days of the date this letter was received.
If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any
outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty
Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare
applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train
company or its debt recovery agency.
Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the
date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to
recover the penalty fare.
Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day
after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares)
Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date
received is the letter date.


Rejection 2:
I understand you are unhappy with the outcome of your appeal and would advise that where a case
review is requested, the paperwork is passed to a different assessor and the appeal is judged again from
the beginning.
In line with Regulations 5 of The Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time,
any person travelling by, present on or leaving a penalty fares train must, if required by an authorised
collector, produce a valid ticket or other authority for the journey they have made or are making. If a person
fails to produce a valid ticket or other authority in line with Regulation 5.1, the authorised collector may
charge that person a penalty fare, in line with the regulations.
Every passenger has equal rights and responsibilities when using the rail network. For example, everyone
has the right to make the rail journey covered by the validity of their ticket/pass/smartcard, and a
responsibility to adhere to the terms and conditions under which the product held was issued. The National
Rail Conditions of Travel set out those rights and responsibilities and advise that a valid ticket or other
authority to travel must be produced for inspection when required.
Although the mitigation mentioned on appeal has been taken into consideration, there is no evidence to
support the discretion guidelines having been breached by the authorised collector at the time of issue.
Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been
unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision to the Final Appeal Panel. If doing so, please give
the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and also mention any additional circumstances
you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be submitted by post to: Penalty Services, 12
Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach, Woodbridge, IP12 1BL, or through our website at
www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14 days of the date this letter was received.
If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any
outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty
Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare
applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train
company or its debt recovery agency.
Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the
date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to
recover the penalty fare.
Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day
after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares)
Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date
received is the letter date.

How can I avoid paying this fare, given that I literally bought the ticket beforehand and tapped in at the start of my journey?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

tatitiliti

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2025
Messages
217
Location
Newark
Hello everyone,

I was on the return leg of my journey, which was from Cambridge to Stevenage, when my phone died after I scanned in at Cambridge. A collector then walked past and when I couldn't show her the ticket (which was on my phone), I was issued a penalty fare. I have a 16-25 railcard, and I purchased my return ticket the night before my journey, from the trainline app. The staff asked me where I was headed and I told her I was headed back to Stevenage, and then she took my details and issued me with the fare but told me that I could appeal and it would probably be accepted. However, I have appealed twice now and both times have been rejected. Both rejection emails are below:

Rejection 1:
To ensure fairness and consistency in the decision-making process, appeals are considered in conjunction
with a code of practice. The statements submitted on behalf of the passenger and the train company will
both be taken into account by an experienced assessor to determine the appeal outcome. More information
about how appeals are decided is available on our homepage at www.penaltyservices.co.uk.
Many rail users consider penalty fares to be an accusation of fare avoidance but this is not the case at
all. A Penalty Fare is simply a higher fare which may be issued under The Penalty Fares Rules and
Regulations by a member of staff who is licensed to act on behalf of a train operating company which
issues penalty fares. Penalty fare warning posters are on display at every penalty fares station (as required
under Regulation 8) advising customers of the consequences for boarding a penalty fares train without a
valid ticket or other authority to travel in their possession.
The National Rail Conditions of Travel (NRCoT) advise that where the facility to buy a ticket exists prior to
boarding, passengers should pay the correct fare for their entire journey before they travel and produce for
inspection a valid ticket as evidence of their right to make a journey on the relevant train, otherwise they
may be liable to pay a Penalty Fare Notice.
I understand a valid ticket was unavailable for inspection on request because you have stated your
phone battery died.
In accordance with the terms and conditions of use, any pre-ordered ticket must be available for inspection
during travel as evidence of a passenger's right to make a rail journey.
Pre-booked products must be printed, or loaded to a smartcard or electronic device, before a journey starts
in readiness for ticket inspection to take place. Assuming enough battery is held on a device to display the
product, the journey being made is covered by its validity, and the train operator accepts this type of ticket
on its lines of route, an electronic ticket would pass inspection at the time of travel.
All tickets issued are subject to the National Rail Conditions of Travel, which stress that passengers must
show and where asked, hand over for inspection, a valid ticket and any relevant Railcard. If not, they will be
treated as having joined the train without a valid ticket and may be liable to a Penalty Fare Notice or
prosecution. Unfortunately, these conditions do not facilitate the production of a ticket at a different time
(with the exception of certain season tickets).
The safekeeping of a ticket is the passenger’s responsibility and unfortunately (with the exception of some
season tickets) lost, mislaid, discarded or stolen tickets tend not to be replaced. The NRCoT explains the
passenger's rights in relation to any refunds for unused tickets.

A receipt or proof of payment is not a ticket, is not valid for travel and will not be accepted in place of a
ticket at the time of travel. Similarly, a ticket that has been produced for inspection at a later date cannot be
used to cancel a Penalty Fare Notice (with the exception of certain season tickets).
Whether or not a ticket was bought is not being disputed by the train company.
As a valid ticket could not be produced for inspection on request at the time of travel, I'm afraid it has been
concluded by Penalty Services that the Penalty Fare Notice should stand.
Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been
unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision. Any further appeal will be considered by a different
appeal assessor. If re-appealing, please give the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and
also mention any additional circumstances you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be
submitted by post to: Penalty Services, 12 Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach,
Woodbridge, IP12 1BL, or through our website at www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14
days of the date this letter was received.
If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any
outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty
Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare
applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train
company or its debt recovery agency.
Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the
date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to
recover the penalty fare.
Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day
after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares)
Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date
received is the letter date.


Rejection 2:
I understand you are unhappy with the outcome of your appeal and would advise that where a case
review is requested, the paperwork is passed to a different assessor and the appeal is judged again from
the beginning.
In line with Regulations 5 of The Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time,
any person travelling by, present on or leaving a penalty fares train must, if required by an authorised
collector, produce a valid ticket or other authority for the journey they have made or are making. If a person
fails to produce a valid ticket or other authority in line with Regulation 5.1, the authorised collector may
charge that person a penalty fare, in line with the regulations.
Every passenger has equal rights and responsibilities when using the rail network. For example, everyone
has the right to make the rail journey covered by the validity of their ticket/pass/smartcard, and a
responsibility to adhere to the terms and conditions under which the product held was issued. The National
Rail Conditions of Travel set out those rights and responsibilities and advise that a valid ticket or other
authority to travel must be produced for inspection when required.
Although the mitigation mentioned on appeal has been taken into consideration, there is no evidence to
support the discretion guidelines having been breached by the authorised collector at the time of issue.
Having taken into consideration all the points raised to date, we regret to advise that your appeal has been
unsuccessful. It is your right to re-appeal this decision to the Final Appeal Panel. If doing so, please give
the reason(s) why you are appealing against this decision and also mention any additional circumstances
you would like taken into account. A further appeal should be submitted by post to: Penalty Services, 12
Deben Mill Business Centre, Old Maltings Approach, Woodbridge, IP12 1BL, or through our website at
www.penaltyservices.co.uk/make-an-appeal/ within 14 days of the date this letter was received.
If you choose not to re-appeal and have not already paid your Penalty Fare Notice, you should pay any
outstanding debt. Failure to pay can mean that the time allowed to pay the reduced amount for the Penalty
Fare can run out making the amount of the Penalty Fare £100 plus the price of the full single fare
applicable and further delays in payment may result in administration fees being added by the train
company or its debt recovery agency.
Please also be aware that if you do not re-appeal this decision or pay the penalty fare within 14 days of the
date this letter was received, the train operating company will be entitled to commence court proceedings to
recover the penalty fare.
Where this reply came by post to your address, the date received is assumed to be the second working day
after the letter/post date as defined in paragraph 3 of schedule 2 of The Railways (Penalty Fares)
Regulations 2018 as amended from time to time. Where you have been informed by email reply, the date
received is the letter date.

How can I avoid paying this fare, given that I literally bought the ticket beforehand and tapped in at the start of my journey?
Unfortunately, you were not able to produce a valid ticket when asked.

Please post photos of the penalty fare notice here as it may have been issued non-compliantly and a technical appeal is your best bet (do not appeal again for any other reason - you’ll be wasting your final appeal).

It may also be worth emailing GTR in parallel with your ticket that will have a purchase timestamp on it, as they may consider rescinding the penalty fare notice on this basis, though they’re not obliged to.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,480
A question that will arise when you have posted the Penalty Fare Notice (PFN) is which train you were travelling on (ie: what time did it leave Cambridge) and where was it when the PFN was issued? Answering these will help us to assess whether the Notice was correctly issued.
 

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Unfortunately, you were not able to produce a valid ticket when asked.

Please post photos of the penalty fare notice here as it may have been issued non-compliantly and a technical appeal is your best bet (do not appeal again for any other reason - you’ll be wasting your final appeal).

It may also be worth emailing GTR in parallel with your ticket that will have a purchase timestamp on it, as they may consider rescinding the penalty fare notice on this basis, though they’re not obliged to.
The penalty fare notice is attached here, and I was taking the 14:21 train from Cambridge, and the ticket was issued just after Royston.
 

Attachments

  • Notice Part 2_1.jpg
    Notice Part 2_1.jpg
    315.1 KB · Views: 196
  • Notice Part 3.jpg
    Notice Part 3.jpg
    471.6 KB · Views: 194
  • Notice Part 1.jpg
    Notice Part 1.jpg
    215.6 KB · Views: 194

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,480
The good news is that this hasn't obviously been issued in accordance with the regulations. You should have been offered the option to have the PFN issued to Royston where you could get off an buy a ticket for the rest of the journey. Were you asked if you wanted it issued to Stevenage? If the answer to that is no, it has been incorrectly issued and the fare charged will, inevitably, be wrong.

Others will be able to assist you in drafting your third appeal. It's important not to rush this as it is your last chance.
 

Sasomida

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2026
Messages
6
Location
Sheffield
The op said the ticket was issued just after Royston - do you mean the option should have been given to have the PFN issued to Hitchin, which is the next stop after Royston?
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,574
Location
UK
The op said the ticket was issued just after Royston - do you mean the option should have been given to have the PFN issued to Hitchin, which is the next stop after Royston?
Yes - the passenger should be asked whether they want the Penalty Fare to be issued to the next station or to their destination (if served by the train they are on).

The reason for this is to cater for exactly the kind of situation the OP found themselves in - where you have a valid ticket but simply can't produce it at the time of inspection. If the OP were able to charge their phone, for example if the Stevenage gateline staff were kind enough to offer to charge the OP's phone for a few minutes, then this would be sufficient for them to complete their journey.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,480
The op said the ticket was issued just after Royston - do you mean the option should have been given to have the PFN issued to Hitchin, which is the next stop after Royston?
The train shows on RTT as having arrived at Royston at 1440, 7 minutes after the PFN was issued.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Reading
You might also throw in quotes from the ORR's recent review - which they seem to be in no hurry to enact!
https://www.orr.gov.uk/independent-review-train-operators-revenue-protection-practices

We can see no reasonable justification for penalising passengers where no revenue has been lost and where there is no risk of loss.

You might mention that Penalty Fares can't have been intended to cover situations such as yours or else they'd have made an allowance for this in the regulations as it would be perverse for regulations to require anyone to pay the fare twice (once its been proved the fare was paid) - separate from any element of penalty!
 

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Hello everyone, thank you very much for all your replies.
I have tried to take on your advice, and could you please review this final appeal:
I arrived at Cambridge station around 14:10-14:15 on the 22nd of July, and got on the 14:21 train from Cambridge to Brighton (it was delayed a bit) to go to Stevenage. I was not able to show my ticket because it was an e-ticket, and my phone had died after getting on the train. However, my ticket was issued just after Royston, and I was not informed that I could get off at the next stop to be issued a smaller penalty fare (because, as will be mentioned later, I did have a valid ticket for the journey which I could have shown after charging at the next station, to continue my journey to Stevenage).
The ticket (anytime day return, which I scanned in with at Cambridge) and my railcard, as well as the notice (split into parts) are attached. I used the ticket to catch a train into Cambridge from Stevenage on the 08:29 to 09:09 service to Cambridge, as well as tapping in, so I had a valid ticket for both halves of my journey (I used the ticket to tap in at Stevenage and out at Cambridge, and in at Cambridge on my return, before my phone ran out of battery).
I hope that you will be able to verify that I scanned in at both stations with my outbound ticket, and at Cambridge with my return ticket, and so verify that I did have a ticket at the time of travel.
Additionally, I would like to mention that in the ORR's recent review, they stated that "We can see no reasonable justification for penalising passengers where no revenue has been lost and where there is no risk of loss." As you can see from verifying my ticket, there was no loss to revenue.
Do you think there is anything I should modify about this?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,480
Do you think there is anything I should modify about this?
Yes, almost all of it. You need to be telling them why the PFN isn't issued in accordance with the regulations. Explaining why you couldn't show a ticket gives them an opportunity to refuse your appeal.
 

tatitiliti

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2025
Messages
217
Location
Newark
Hello everyone, thank you very much for all your replies.
I have tried to take on your advice, and could you please review this final appeal:
I arrived at Cambridge station around 14:10-14:15 on the 22nd of July, and got on the 14:21 train from Cambridge to Brighton (it was delayed a bit) to go to Stevenage. I was not able to show my ticket because it was an e-ticket, and my phone had died after getting on the train. However, my ticket was issued just after Royston, and I was not informed that I could get off at the next stop to be issued a smaller penalty fare (because, as will be mentioned later, I did have a valid ticket for the journey which I could have shown after charging at the next station, to continue my journey to Stevenage).
The ticket (anytime day return, which I scanned in with at Cambridge) and my railcard, as well as the notice (split into parts) are attached. I used the ticket to catch a train into Cambridge from Stevenage on the 08:29 to 09:09 service to Cambridge, as well as tapping in, so I had a valid ticket for both halves of my journey (I used the ticket to tap in at Stevenage and out at Cambridge, and in at Cambridge on my return, before my phone ran out of battery).
I hope that you will be able to verify that I scanned in at both stations with my outbound ticket, and at Cambridge with my return ticket, and so verify that I did have a ticket at the time of travel.
Additionally, I would like to mention that in the ORR's recent review, they stated that "We can see no reasonable justification for penalising passengers where no revenue has been lost and where there is no risk of loss." As you can see from verifying my ticket, there was no loss to revenue.
Do you think there is anything I should modify about this?
Definitely don’t send this - it will get rejected again because you’re trying to excuse what you did, which is a valid reason to issue a PFN.

The only relevant thing you need to be discussing is why the PFN wasn’t issued in accordance with the regulations as we’ve explained above.
 

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Ok, I have got rid of the stuff where I was trying to excuse what I did, and mostly just put why the PFN wasn't issued in accordance to the regulations.
I arrived at Cambridge station around 14:10-14:15 on the 22nd of July, and got on the 14:21 train from Cambridge to Brighton (it was delayed a bit) to go to Stevenage. I was not able to show my ticket because it was an e-ticket, and my phone had died after getting on the train. However, the penalty fare I was issued for this was not issued in accordance to regulations. It was issued just after Royston, and so should have authorised me only to Ashwell & Mordon, however the ticket collector asked me where I was headed and issued me a penalty fare for travel to Stevenage. This is not according to regulations, and so should be rescinded.
Would this be alright now, or is there still more I should add/modify?
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Reading
Cut out all the irrelevant preamble. You need to force them to address the legal arguments and nothing else. Quote the actual regulations by number including the words of those regulations so they don't need to cross-reference.
Appeal under 18(2)(b), 16(3)(a) because 9(1A), 9(2A), 5(5A)(b) next station was X and no alternative was requested but it was issued to the further station Y.
Then under 18(4) appeal must be allowed.
Further, also appeal separately under 18(2)(b), 16(3)(d) pointing out notwithstanding the dead battery the complete journey had been paid for (evidenced by ticket you include) and no revenue was lost with the ORR report quote - this is not a case of fare evasion for which the penalty was designed.

Finally I'd suggest ending with something like this:
"If the Appeals Body were minded to disallow my appeal (which I hope will not be the case), I would encourage it to take legal advice in relation to the interpretation of these provisions in order to inform its decision and would request that details of its legal analysis is included in the decision."

(If you're using a form that doesn't have enough space, get around it by using an attachment. There is no size limit for an appeal.)
 

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Thank you @furlong for the advice, I have just included the regulations and the legal arguments now:

I am appealing the penalty fare I was issued under 18(2)(b), 16(3)(a) - the penalty fare issued was not charged in accordance to the requirements of the penalty fare regulations. This is because under 9(1A), 9(2A), 5(5A)(b), the penalty fare should have authorised me to travel to either the next station (Ashwell & Morden) or a later station. However, even though the next station was Ashwell & Morden, this was not suggested to me as an option, and instead the penalty fare was issued, and charged, to the further station Stevenage. Then, under 18(4) (if any ground in 16(3) applies, appeal must be allowed by the Final Appeal Board) appeal must be allowed.
I am also appealing separately under 18(2)(b), 16(3)(d) - there are compelling reasons why, in the particular circumstances of the case, the appellant should not be liable to pay the penalty fare. This is because, regardless of my phone's dead battery, my complete journey had been paid for in advance of the journey (ticket is attached to this appeal, and it can be verified that the ticket was scanned in at departure from Cambridge), hence no revenue was lost, and from the ORR's recent report, this then can not be a case of fare evasion for which the penalty was designed. Similarly to the above appeal then, under 18(4), appeal must be allowed.
If the Final Appeal Board believe that the appeal should be disallowed (which I hope should not be the case), I would encourage it to take legal advice in relation to the interpretation of these provisions in order to inform its decision and would request that details of its legal analysis is included in the decision.
If there is anything else that should be added or modified, or if I should add back some of the details like where or when the journey was from please let me know, and thank you for your ongoing suggestions
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Reading
Something more like:

...should have authorised me to travel to the next station (Ashwell & Morden). It was issued to a further station, Stevenage, without discussion. This means I am being required to pay a penalty higher than the minimum amount set out in the regulations, which I did not ask to do. As such, the Penalty Fare was not issued in accordance with those regulations. Under 18(4)...

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Cut "Similarly to the above appeal...allowed". Mentioning 18(4) once is enough. The first one is mandatory - they have no choice but to grant the appeal unless the train company disputed the facts - the second one is at their discretion.
 
Last edited:

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Ok, thank you again - shall I submit the following as my appeal then?

I am appealing the penalty fare I was issued under 18(2)(b), 16(3)(a) - the penalty fare issued was not charged in accordance to the requirements of the penalty fare regulations. This is because under 9(1A), 9(2A), 5(5A)(b), the penalty fare should have authorised me to travel to either the next station (Ashwell & Morden) or a later station. However, even though the next station was Ashwell & Morden, this was not suggested to me as an option, and instead the penalty fare was issued, and charged, to the further station Stevenage, without discussion. This means I am being required to pay a penalty higher than the minimum set out in the regulations, without me asking to do so, and so the Penalty Fare was not issued in accordance with those regulations. Then, under 18(4) (if any ground in 16(3) applies, appeal must be allowed by the Final Appeal Board) appeal must be allowed.
I am also appealing separately under 18(2)(b), 16(3)(d) - there are compelling reasons why, in the particular circumstances of the case, the appellant should not be liable to pay the penalty fare. This is because, regardless of my phone's dead battery, my complete journey had been paid for in advance of the journey (ticket is attached to this appeal, and it can be verified that the ticket was scanned in at departure from Cambridge), hence no revenue was lost, and from the ORR's recent report, this then can not be a case of fare evasion for which the penalty was designed.
If the Final Appeal Board believe that the appeal should be disallowed (which I hope should not be the case), I would encourage it to take legal advice in relation to the interpretation of these provisions in order to inform its decision and would request that details of its legal analysis is included in the decision.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,574
Location
UK
I would rephrase it slightly to make it clear what law you are appealing under:
I am appealing the Penalty Fare under Regulations 18(2)(b) and 16(3)(a) of the Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018, as the Penalty Fare was not charged in accordance to the requirements of the Regulations. This is because under Regulations 9(1A), 9(2A), and 5(5A)(b), the Penalty Fare should have authorised me to travel to either the next station stop (Ashwell & Morden) or a subsequent station served by the train. However, even though the next stop was Ashwell & Morden at the time of the Penalty Fare being issued, the possibility of having the Penalty Fare issued to there (and charging my phone or buying a new ticket to continue my journey) was not offered. Instead the Penalty Fare was issued, and charged, to the further station of Stevenage without any discussion. This means I am being required to pay a Penalty Fare which is higher than the amount set out in the Regulations; therefore, the Penalty Fare was not issued in accordance with those regulations. Under Regulation 18(4), if any ground of appeal listed in Regulation 16(3) applies, an appeal must be allowed by the Final Appeal Board.

I am also appealing under Regulations 18(2)(b) and 16(3)(d) as I believe there are compelling reasons why, in the particular circumstances of the case, I (the appellant) should not be liable to pay the penalty fare. This is because, regardless of my phone's dead battery, my complete journey had been paid for in advance of the journey (my ticket is attached to this appeal, and it can be verified that the ticket was scanned in at departure from Cambridge). Paragraph 35 of the ORR's 2025 review of train operators' revenue protection practices (https://www.orr.gov.uk/independent-review-train-operators-revenue-protection-practices) endorsed the principle that the industry should not be 'penalising passengers where there is a ticket irregularity involving no risk of revenue loss' - as was the case for my journey. I believe this represents clear evidence of compelling reasons why I should not be held liable for the Penalty Fare.

If the Final Appeal Board nevertheless believes that this appeal should be disallowed (which I hope should not be the case), I would encourage it to take legal advice in relation to the interpretation of these provisions in order to inform its decision and would request that details of its legal analysis is included in the decision.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Reading
maybe "as was the case for my journey" => "as can be seen here in retrospect for my journey"

The point to get across is that the appeals body is not being asked to judge whether or not it was correct for the inspector to impose a PF at the time (it was) but that with the additional information available to the appeals body it is correct now to cancel it. We often see letters from the appeals bodies that show they merely considered the situation from the perspective of the inspector at the time and failed to understand their primary role of reviewing the penalty in the light of additional evidence available to them.
 

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Thank you @Watershed and @furlong, so is this the final appeal that I should submit?

I am appealing the Penalty Fare under Regulations 18(2)(b) and 16(3)(a) of the Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018, as the Penalty Fare was not charged in accordance to the requirements of the Regulations. This is because under Regulations 9(1A), 9(2A), and 5(5A)(b), the Penalty Fare should have authorised me to travel to either the next station stop (Ashwell & Morden) or a subsequent station served by the train. However, even though the next stop was Ashwell & Morden at the time of the Penalty Fare being issued, the possibility of having the Penalty Fare issued to there (and charging my phone or buying a new ticket to continue my journey) was not offered. Instead the Penalty Fare was issued, and charged, to the further station of Stevenage without any discussion. This means I am being required to pay a Penalty Fare which is higher than the amount set out in the Regulations; therefore, the Penalty Fare was not issued in accordance with those regulations. Under Regulation 18(4), if any ground of appeal listed in Regulation 16(3) applies, an appeal must be allowed by the Final Appeal Board.

I am also appealing under Regulations 18(2)(b) and 16(3)(d) as I believe there are compelling reasons why, in the particular circumstances of the case, I (the appellant) should not be liable to pay the penalty fare. This is because, regardless of my phone's dead battery, my complete journey had been paid for in advance of the journey (my ticket is attached to this appeal, and it can be verified that the ticket was scanned in at departure from Cambridge). Paragraph 35 of the ORR's 2025 review of train operators' revenue protection practices (https://www.orr.gov.uk/independent-review-train-operators-revenue-protection-practices) endorsed the principle that the industry should not be 'penalising passengers where there is a ticket irregularity involving no risk of revenue loss' - as can be seen in retrospect for my journey. I believe this represents clear evidence of compelling reasons why I should not be held liable for the Penalty Fare.

If the Final Appeal Board nevertheless believes that this appeal should be disallowed (which I hope should not be the case), I would encourage it to take legal advice in relation to the interpretation of these provisions in order to inform its decision and would request that details of its legal analysis is included in the decision.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Reading
Yeah - I'd try that. The two arguments work in tandem. A technical one and a public policy one. The final paragraph is designed to make things awkward for them later if they choose to deny the appeal without being in possession of legal advice and providing you with their legal reasoning supporting refusal on the technical point. (The regulations require them to provide you with such reasons but we know they often fail to do so therefore need to be reminded.)
 
Last edited:

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
I have just submitted the appeal, and I will update here on the result of my appeal. Thank you for all the advice everyone!
 

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Hello everyone, the date of the ticket was listed as 12/08, and I still have not received a response on my appeal, so can I assume that I do not need to pay it?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,182
Location
LBK
When did you submit your appeal? The "pay by" date freezes when you make appeals.
 

fatal

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2026
Messages
12
Location
Stevenage
Ok, thank you for letting me know.
They have 21 days to assess the appeal, so until 27th August in your case.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Hello everyone - thank you for everyone who took the time out to help out with this final appeal. However, they have rejected this one too. I am attaching their response to my appeal here.
1787233730768.png1787233760802.png
 
Last edited:

walkingsophie

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2025
Messages
235
Location
Sunbury
There's definitely value in complaining to Transport Focus here, other people would be able to advise you on how best to do that.
 

Top